In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

327 Magnum?

helimanheliman Member Posts: 597 ✭✭✭✭
edited November 2007 in Ask the Experts
Has anybody heard of a new round developed by Federal and Ruger called a .327 Mag? The round is a 32 H&R magnum, lengthened. Ballistically supposed to be between a 38+P and .357 mag. It will be chambered in a Ruger SP101 with a 3" barrel. The advantage is 6 shot capability in a J-frame sized package. Heard about it on Tom Gresham's "guntalk" radio show. Sounds intriguing.[?][?][?]

Comments

  • Wolf.Wolf. Member Posts: 2,223 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Right off the top of my head (boy, is that dangerous[:0]) I can't think of any good reason to go to that effort, aside for providing a new toy for the gunwriters (another bunch of "expert" [NOT], freeloading neer' do wells) to scribble BS about, and to make people like us think we can't live without it.
  • gskyhawkgskyhawk Member Posts: 4,773
    edited November -1
    go to www.rugerforum.org
    quite a bit of info over there

    as for why , lets see , more power in a small package , 6 rounds instead of 5 , it can also shoot the 32mag , 32S&W long

    sounds like a nice little gun that would be great as a trail gun or even CCW

    sign me up , i'm going to get one real soon [:D]
  • nononsensenononsense Member Posts: 10,928 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    heliman,

    From Federal's website:

    http://www.federalcartridge.com/default.asp?menu=1&s1=4&s2=6&id=171&brand=5&year=2007

    "According to lead design engineer Larry Head, "The 327 Federal Magnum is ideal for personal defense and has the potential for future application in field use. Using a slightly longer 32 H&R Magnum case and our advanced powder and bullet technology, we're able to offer more performance out of a smaller platform. And its recoil is milder than the 357 Magnum. We're excited to partner with Ruger and bring this product to market in the SP101 firearm."

    From Shooting Times:

    "Based on a higher-pressure loading in a 1/8-inch longer .32 H&R case, the .327 Federal Magnum will initially be available in three versions: a Federal Premium 85-grain Hydra-Shok Low Recoil Personal Defense loading, an American Eagle 100-grain Jacketed Soft Point, and a Speer 115-grain Gold Dot.

    From a 3 1/16-inch revolver, the 100-grain Soft Point .327 Magnum load develops 100 fps more velocity than a 125-grain .357 Magnum from a four-inch revolver, and delivers only 35 ft/lbs less energy. The recoil of the .327 Magnum 85-grain Personal Defense load is less than half the recoil of a 125-grain .357 Magnum.

    Subjected to the standard FBI protocol tests for effectiveness through barriers, the 115-grain .327 Magnum load reaches 15 inches in bare gelatin, 16 inches through heavy clothing, 16 inches through plywood, 14.5 inches through wallboard, 13 inches through auto glass, and 20 inches through single-layer vehicle body steel--all with substantial bullet upset ranging from .40 caliber (steel) to .60 caliber (auto glass).

    As announced at the 2007 NASGW Show in Reno, NV, on November 7, 2007, Ruger is offering the .327 Federal Magnum in its time-proven all-steel SP101 revolver, which offers compact size for concealed carry plus a pleasing 28-ounce weight (the same as the polymer-frame Ruger SR9 9mm pistol) for firing this potent little load--which for the first time elevates the .32 caliber to a level of authority for effective use in a life-protection situation."

    And another:

    http://www.gunsandammomag.com/video/GATV_Federal327/

    Best.
  • gunnut505gunnut505 Member Posts: 10,290
    edited November -1
    I'm not falling for it this time!
    Lemme see, a puny .32 caliber, almost as powerful as a 38 special, shoots additional puny .32 caliber ammo, 6-15 rounds(who cares?), and just in time for Christmas...........Think I'll stick with my 38Super and 18 rounds of .38 caliber fun.
    Should be great news for the carnies among us though!
  • tsr1965tsr1965 Member Posts: 8,682 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    gunnut505,

    Did you read that...only 35 ft/lbs less than the famed .357 magnum load, and is running 100fps faster out of a shorter barrel. This little dude has potential. Also has the potential to have extremely high priced, and hard to find ammo.
  • cce1302cce1302 Member Posts: 9,555 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It sounds like loads of fun, and I'm game for it, but I don't know if it'll catch on in the mainstream. On the bright side, 32 caliber bullets are plenty available for reloading, plus 32h&r is always around. I'd carry it CCW.
  • dtknowlesdtknowles Member Posts: 810 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    So they have pumped it up to where it is maybe a match for 7.62 x 25 mm (Mauser/Tokarev). Maybe around where the 32-20 and .30 carbine are in modern revolvers. Not earth shattering, nobody thinks these are great stoppers, performance depends on really good bullets otherwise you get tiny holes. Foot pounds Smoot pounds in pistols foot pounds is not a good indicator, power factor is better and measured that way it is in the 9mm +P and 38 spec. +P catagory not really close to the .357 Mag.

    Tim
  • ruger41ruger41 Member Posts: 14,665 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ruger is already showing it as available on their website
    http://www.ruger.com/Firearms/FAProdSpecsView?model=5759
    dang it is spendy!! $572--that is a bit much for a little revolver like that--can only imagine what the ammo is gonna run.
  • helimanheliman Member Posts: 597 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    ruger41, probably closer to $425 actual retail. My guess, anyhow.[:I]
  • beantownshootahbeantownshootah Member Posts: 12,776 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    This is a bit of a trick.

    Since energy is proportionate to the SQUARE of velocity, small lightweight bullets can be given high energies.

    Its the same reason (for example) why a 9mm Luger has a nearly identical muzzle energy as a .45 ACP, even though the .45s bullet is twice as heavy.

    But the problem is that all else being equal the one with the greater MOMENTUM (aka "power factor") will have the better stopping power.

    So while this .32 monstrosity might have the energy of a .357, its not going to have nearly the same stopping ability. Smaller bullet equals smaller wound channel, and lighter bullet equals less penetration with equal energies.

    If you want a round that is ballistically between a .38+P and a .357 magnum, it already exists. . .its called the 9mm luger (+P), and if you like, you can even put it in some revolvers.

    Alternatively, you can just go with a low-loaded .357 (IE .38 +P+), and then you can use the same revolver that you use for .38 specials.

    To my way of thinking, the only thing this .32 gives you is one more shot out of a small revolver. . .its not worth it, IMO. I'd rather have 5 .357s than 6 of these from a similar sized gun.

    Now, if they could put this into a SMALLER revolver than a J-frame, that might have some appeal as a more pocketable carry gun.
Sign In or Register to comment.