In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

For real? (GB auction 71615502)

givettegivette Member Posts: 10,886
edited May 2007 in Ask the Experts
Why is this rifle giving me the heeby-jeebies? (Serno. is incorrect for US property marked 1894, right)? Something just doesn't feel right about it, and I can't nail it down. Red light flashing somewhere in the back of my mind. Anyone have an opinion? Joe.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=71615502

Comments

  • tsavo303tsavo303 Member Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    i would not trust it. were there "US" marked 94's?
  • givettegivette Member Posts: 10,886
    edited November -1
    Yes, I think so. Very late WWI and shortly thereafter. (Few hundred). Don't know why Uncle Sam needed '94's, though. Joe
  • Old-ColtsOld-Colts Member Posts: 22,697 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1

    If you can't feel the music; it's only pink noise!

  • utbrowningmanutbrowningman Member Posts: 2,776 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'm nowhere near a firearms expert but seeing "Made in U.S.A." with the periods after each letter do not appear right to me for a rifle circa WW II.
  • Bill DeShivsBill DeShivs Member Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I don't know if the gun is legit, but it does not appear to have been refinished.
    Bill
  • Bert H.Bert H. Member Posts: 11,281 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Bill DeShivs
    I don't know if the gun is legit, but it does not appear to have been refinished.
    Bill


    Hello Bill,

    It most definitely has been refinished. If you go to the topic links posted by Old-Colts, you ca see & read the previous discussion that I initiated specifically about this faked gun.

    WACA Historian & Life Member

  • heavyironheavyiron Member Posts: 1,421 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    OK. Call me stupid.

    This will probably get me banned from the forum or my post deleted from the thread, but here goes.

    If the rifle is an obvious fake, why does the website leave it up for auction, misidentified, and misrepresented? It is an obvious fraud - right???

    I would think one of the knowledgeable experts would do the right and decent thing and report the fraud to the website to protect unsuspecting and unaware buyers.

    I would hope someone has contacted the responsible parties on the website and gets the auction corrected to reflect all of this expert information.

    Regards,

    Heavyiron
  • rufe-snowrufe-snow Member Posts: 18,650 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    "Caveat Emptor" has always been the eleventh commandment, for the on-line auctions. I doubt very much if the management of this auction or any other, wants to get involved unless a definite pattern of fraud/deception has been established by one particular seller.
  • tsavo303tsavo303 Member Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I asked about US stamp not looking like a stamp I also had the uhuh feeling, but know nothing about 94s
    I also asked for documentaion of the elaborate history that he claimed.
    his responce:
    "Hi Tom--- I can assure you that the U. S. marking and the Ordnance bomb is properly stamped on the carbine. This carbine is in immaculate condition and I fully guarantee it to be original and not refinished. At the start of the war, there was an immediate need for weapons that could be used for stateside purposes. Rifles and shotguns were needed for guard duty at docks, airfields, prisons, war plant contractors, etc. These weapons were purchased and used in that capacity.
    There are some references to this use in several of the publications printed regarding U.S. Military shotguns.

    Thanks very much for the inquiry--- Frank"
  • dfletcherdfletcher Member Posts: 8,179 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I agree 100% with heavyiron. Let's go further.

    As I mentioned in the previous thread regarding this rifle, serial numbers are not open to interpretation. If the numbers reflect a later than date, well - there's no way to finesse that and it makes obvious this is not the true article; and that the seller should reasonably be aware of that fact.

    Also, the fellow offering this rifle has perfect feedback. As someone who has purchased on GB, these two facts cause me concern.

    I note that in the carefully worded description the seller does not assert the rifle has not been reblued. He comes close, stating the rifle is "original" but I think a critical read of the advert says to me at least, that he is choosing his words very carefully with an eye to ambiguity.
  • tsavo303tsavo303 Member Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    He might have gotten take, now it is hard for him to admit its a fake. just a guess
Sign In or Register to comment.