In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Colt experts: Paterson opinions wanted

Spider7115Spider7115 Member Posts: 29,704 ✭✭✭
edited November 2007 in Ask the Experts
Would one of you Colt experts please convince me that this "Baby Paterson" is legit? I have no intention of bidding on it but it looks toally fake to me - the markings, the engraving and the condition. Additionally, I would think that IF it was real, it would have irrefutable provenance with references. More pictures are on the auction site.

Prove me wrong - please. We're never too old to learn.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=85367808

pix5431718.jpg
pix5431609.jpg
pix5432031.jpg

Comments

  • rhmc24rhmc24 Member Posts: 1,984 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If you are really interested in it why not ask the seller?

    Some observations:
    A lot of tool marks visible possibly recent. The cylinder scene looks chemically etched, not rolled. But maybe the Patersons were etched in the first place. If this is a real Pat, "in the white" it is a great rarity that would go at a much higher number than likely on this offering. From the wording of the seller, to me it looks like he is just " a foolin' " by offering it. Real or phony, I'd love to have it as a new plaything.
  • givettegivette Member Posts: 10,886
    edited November -1
    Wow! Tough call. I would have to find out:

    1. Would ol' Sam have let a firearm leave his factory with second-rate engraving (frame/backstrap)? Rough machine marks? And is it known that early New Jersey Colts had poorer quality finish-work than the later production we've all come to know and admire?

    2. Cylinder depicts Saggitarius shooting a pistol. Is that known on other early Colts?

    3. Was ol' Sam known to hire meskins in his shop for cheap labor?
  • v35v35 Member Posts: 12,710 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Hand filed on a Pakistani mountainside.
    The nipple cutouts though are nice and sharp. They were milled......... last week.
    Grips poorly fitted
  • Spider7115Spider7115 Member Posts: 29,704 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by givette
    Wow! Tough call. I would have to find out:

    1. Would ol' Sam have let a firearm leave his factory with second-rate engraving (frame/backstrap)? Rough machine marks? And is it known that early New Jersey Colts had poorer quality finish-work than the later production we've all come to know and admire?

    2. Cylinder depicts Saggitarius shooting a pistol. Is that known on other early Colts?
    3. Was ol' Sam known to hire meskins in his shop for cheap labor?

    Actually, it's supposed to be a "Centaur" which was apparently on all of the Patersons except for the "Number 5 belt model" which had the stagecoach holdup scene like on the Model 1849. However, this looks like very amateurish engraving and the seller has a starting bid of $20,000 with a reserve. Either he's PT Barnum waiting for a sucker or he really believes he has a rare Colt. I think the former applies as if it was a genuine engraved Paterson, the starting bid would be 10 times that amount and it would have a bona fide pedigree.
  • glabrayglabray Member Posts: 679 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    There are a LOT of fake percussion Colts on the market these days. Most have had a much better job of faking than whoever created this "original" Paterson. There is absolutely nothing about the gun that looks like it is 150+ years old. A look at the closeup photos in the listing shows clearly the scratch marks from use of an abrasive to remove the blued finish. I suspect the seller is fully aware it is a fake as he didn't put much effort into a description.
  • Bill DeShivsBill DeShivs Member Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I doubt there was ever a blued finish on this gun. It appears to be "in the white."
Sign In or Register to comment.