In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
1911 Value
crackeramerican
Member Posts: 6 ✭✭
What would be a ballpark value on a Colt 70 Series 1911 Govt. Model, blue and NIB. Oh yeah, chambered for 9MM.
Comments
It has the flat mainspring housing with the lanyard loop. Wood grips with the diamond around the screw.
The barrel and bushing have been replaced with what looks to be a Series 70 bushing and barrel.
Serial number appears to be four didgits 48XX with two II struck later the II appears to be slightly larger and not directly in line with the four didgits.
Thanks any help appreciated.
He has a Military issue 1911 that was manufactured in 1918, ser# is 269257. It has almost no finish left but everything seems to be nice and tight shoots very well.
He is just looking to get a ballpark on the value. Thanks in advance for the help.
I am looking at the gun now. It has the double diamond grips, H P on the barrel (the H at the back and the P in front). Other markings are United States Property on the front left side of the frame, circle with JM- inside (the JM- are one mark kind of like a brand) the rearing colt is on the left side behind the slide serrations. On the right side of the slide is Model of 1911. U.S. Army and on the right side of the frame is the serial number and no other markings that I can see.
By all outward appearances the gun is original as all of the parts that I can see appear to have the same patina and wear (I am guessing holster wear but that is just a guess as you could take what I know about these put it in a thimble and still have some room left).
Neal
I would expect it to sell in the $500-600 range.
Neal
If the SN is "4968" then it was made in 1912 but it would have been made for the Navy.
This from R.L. Wilson's "Colt's Dates of Manufacture"
Pictures aren't too bad, actually. [:D]
If it was made in 1912 would it still have a patent date of August 1913? That said the II marks really look added so to speak.