In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Marlin 22 magnum

iron85iron85 Member Posts: 7 ✭✭
edited April 2011 in Ask the Experts
Picked this up for a friend over the weekend and its the first Marlin I've seen with checkering this fancy. Is this a new model?1303184588.jpg
Sorry for the poor photo quality its from a cell phone.

Comments

  • rufe-snowrufe-snow Member Posts: 18,650 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It might be beneficial for identification purposes, if you could give us all markings on the rifle and the serial number range.
  • JunkballerJunkballer Member Posts: 9,309 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Since Remington now owns Marlin, I'd say its their design. Looks like it to me anyway !

    "Never do wrong to make a friend----or to keep one".....Robert E. Lee

  • iron85iron85 Member Posts: 7 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    It's a 925m sn 96635853. I did not know that Remington owned Marlin but I don't think that has anything to do with it.
  • JunkballerJunkballer Member Posts: 9,309 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by iron85
    It's a 925m sn 96635853. I did not know that Remington owned Marlin but I don't think that has anything to do with it.
    I have a few 1100's and 870's with checkering thats real similar to that shown. Why would Remington owning Marlin ( NOT )have anything to do with it ?

    "Never do wrong to make a friend----or to keep one".....Robert E. Lee

  • iron85iron85 Member Posts: 7 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ford owned Jaguar for several years and never made a similar looking car. I'm not saying it couldn't have something to do with it, I just don't find it likely. All this being said I've called several friends that are regulars and gun shows and pawn shops and showed them pictures and they haven't seen one with a stock like this either. I looked on the Marlin website and couldn't find anything and didn't have luck with a web search either.
  • oneoldsaponeoldsap Member Posts: 563 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If that's not a Remington influence I don't know what would be !
  • JunkballerJunkballer Member Posts: 9,309 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by oneoldsap
    If that's not a Remington influence I don't know what would be !
    THANK YOU SIR ! I've dealt with guns for +40 yrs and I've learned a little down the road and know a little about corperate America too. I'll say I've never seen a Marlin with that checkering either, but I know how technology is moved from one company to another when one is purchased by another, Jag and Ford exchanged it too, we just did'nt see it. Its a 2004( I think )year model so very possible.

    "Never do wrong to make a friend----or to keep one".....Robert E. Lee

  • iron85iron85 Member Posts: 7 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    It looks to be brand new unfired but I bought it from an individual so I don't know for sure. There was no dust along the stock/action so it is either new or has been kept in a safe. Thanks for the help though fellas was not trying to be rude at all, I just figured if it was a production change I would have seen another by now. I saw several at the Tulsa show a few weeks ago but none like this, also checked walmart and theirs had checkering but not like this.
  • iron85iron85 Member Posts: 7 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    It also has a wide trigger like a Remington 700(eating my words now :P) instead a thin trigger, don't know if that helps at all?
  • JunkballerJunkballer Member Posts: 9,309 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Special order maybe ? Your serial # starts with 96, so you subtract 96 from 100 which = 04, thats how Marlin keeps their date records on their lever guns, not positive about yours though.

    "Never do wrong to make a friend----or to keep one".....Robert E. Lee

  • iron85iron85 Member Posts: 7 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thats what I was thinking. I read that Remington bought Marlin is 07 though, which adds a little more confusion haha.
Sign In or Register to comment.