In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Imbel FAL receiver

BlckhrnBlckhrn Member Posts: 5,136
edited October 2006 in Ask the Experts
Found this in an auction description here, anybody familiar with his statement about the quality of the 2000 imports versus later ones or is this just hype?


Brand new, unused Gear Logo Imbel FAL Receiver. Stamped "2000" inside the mag well. Serial number PAC107xx. Imported by Pacific Armament Corporation (PAC). Excellent medium-gray parkerized finish.

This receiver was manufactured in 2000 and is considered superior to Imbel receivers imported in 2002 and later. Additionally, Imbel receivers bearing "PAC" import marks are more desirable than those bearing Hesse or Century Arms marks.

Comments

  • p3skykingp3skyking Member Posts: 23,916 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I used a IMBEL gear logo receiver, 87th imported by PAC before the ban took effect.
    Excellent finish, fit, and overall buildability.

    As far as the importer marks, I would be leery of complete weapons as the two mentioned companies produced some poor examples. As to receiver only, it should make absolutely no difference. However, for future saleability, I would plainly stamp the receiver NOT ASSEMBLED BY IMPORTER
  • kimberkidkimberkid Member Posts: 8,858 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by p3skyking
    However, for future saleability, I would plainly stamp the receiver NOT ASSEMBLED BY IMPORTER
    [:D]That goes for any receiver marked by Hess or Century!
    If you really desire something, you'll find a way ?
    ? otherwise, you'll find an excuse.
  • BlckhrnBlckhrn Member Posts: 5,136
    edited November -1
    I have a pair of Austrian STG 58 kits and two PAC imported Imbel receivers, consecutively numbered that I will be building on.

    I saw a pair of receivers like mine go for around $1100 here. I really don't see how that would enhance the value as you'd wind up with other SN's in the build anyhow.
  • iwannausernameiwannausername Member Posts: 7,131
    edited November -1
    Gear logo recievers are selling for ~400 each now... I think they are the best of what you could build on at the moment..
  • BlckhrnBlckhrn Member Posts: 5,136
    edited November -1
    You think they are better than DSA?
  • mr_floppymr_floppy Member Posts: 1,090 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    DSA is considered the Top of the line in Fal circles. Imbel runs second.

    Most common statements about Century is you can do builds with them , but your probably better off being experienced and prepared to a lot of tweaking and adjustments in order to get them to work properly. But some people really like challenges. Hesse has a terrible reputation.

    The fal files is a very good source of information.
  • Gunslinger2005Gunslinger2005 Member Posts: 282 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I really don't have any first hand experience with post 2000 Imbel receivers, but I do have three non gear logo Imbel/STG58 rifles built with receivers from the mid to late 1990's. Cosmetically, the gear logo receivers may look a little nicer in the non critical areas, but the regular ones are first rate too. I believe Imbel is the contractor that makes receivers, frames, slides, etc. for Springfield Armory, and their products are first rate too.

    I also have a DSArms SA58 Paratrooper (DSA built). DSA is better. IMHO.

    Whatever way you go, it will still be a "parts" gun or a "kit" gun, as far as resale value. My Imbel/STG58's work flawlessly, but with nonmatching numbers, no matter how good they are, they're still "kit" guns. If you're talking about $1100 receivers, for my money, I'd just have DSA build what you want.
  • BlckhrnBlckhrn Member Posts: 5,136
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Gunslinger2005
    I really don't have any first hand experience with post 2000 Imbel receivers, but I do have three non gear logo Imbel/STG58 rifles built with receivers from the mid to late 1990's. Cosmetically, the gear logo receivers may look a little nicer in the non critical areas, but the regular ones are first rate too. I believe Imbel is the contractor that makes receivers, frames, slides, etc. for Springfield Armory, and their products are first rate too.

    I also have a DSArms SA58 Paratrooper (DSA built). DSA is better. IMHO.

    Whatever way you go, it will still be a "parts" gun or a "kit" gun, as far as resale value. My Imbel/STG58's work flawlessly, but with nonmatching numbers, no matter how good they are, they're still "kit" guns. If you're talking about $1100 receivers, for my money, I'd just have DSA build what you want.




    That was $1100/pair. I was debating selling them and going with DSA, which I understood was superior to Imbel regardless of the FN license.
  • richbugrichbug Member Posts: 3,650
    edited November -1
    I have built quite a few FAL's. The only difference I have seen between the newer Imbels and the older is that the barrel needs more torque to time properly on the 2003 and newer ones.

    2005 Imbels can be a total train wreck, I think they cranked as many out as they could and didn't pay attention to their QC when the new ruling came out trying to get as many as they could in country. I wouldn't buy a 2005 unless the price was really good, and I expected there to be problems.

    PAC imports do tend to bring a bit more money than the Century imports. As do receivers before they started dating them. They are the same part, same MFG, just a different importer. Century just has a bad rap for their completed rifles. I have never seen one I couldn't make work though. The was a time when Century used PAC Imbel's for their builds, I have one here that has both names on it.

    I thing DSA and 2004 and older Imbels are basically equals as far as quality goes. You show me where to get $550 each for an Imbel and I will tear some rifles apart, and replace the receiver with a $325 DSA. I have seen the market on Imbels settle in the $400 range.

    The STG kits seem to have settled in the $325-375 for a primo one, a little more if it is an early Belgian kit.
  • iwannausernameiwannausername Member Posts: 7,131
    edited November -1
    Imbel is the *only* FN licensed manufacturer right now, building on FN equipment... DSA, while good and american made, isn't FN. Sorta like OEM parts for a car.,,
  • BlckhrnBlckhrn Member Posts: 5,136
    edited November -1
    Last Imbel receiver I watched here got $427, one up now already has a $475 bid with days to go. As I said, the $550 was each for a consecutively numbered pair.

    Mine are 05, and clocked at about 25 and 45 degrees with the barrels from my kits (hand tight). From what I read they should come up to no more than 15 degrees. I had figured on cutting a couple thousandths off the shoulders before tightening.

    Did you buy or make the block for the receiver and what do you use for a barrel wrench?
Sign In or Register to comment.