In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Your Opinion on Kel-Tec?
tr fox
Member Posts: 13,856
I read an awful lot of supportative comments from Kel-Tec owners. Yet I also sometimes read about Kel-tec owners who have problems. So, I have posted my thoughts on this below and I would like some feedback from anyone interested. Thanks.
I am also starting to think that with some of the smaller firearms manufacturers that sell a low priced product, to try and still make a reasonable profit, they let their new firearms out of their factory without going to the expense of a careful, post-production examination. Instead they leave that examination to the purchaser of that firearm. A purchaser I might add that will in most cases do a much closer and maybe better job on that "final" inspection.
I have followed the Kel-tec story closely and from a few different vantage points. I don't know as much about the Kel-tec PF 9 as I do about the P11 and others. But it appears that it is true that on a regular basis, a few new owners will find that his new Kel-tec malfunctions as soon as the first time at the range (we all agree we should give a brand new gun reasonable range time before we depend on it to save our life, don't we?).
But then the story always seems to play out that the new owners ships his defective firearm off to Kel-tec, it is repaired quickly, for free and done well, and then that owner goes on to have no further problems with his Kel-tec.
If my observations are incorrect, somebody please tell me. If necessary, start a new topic thread.
I am also starting to think that with some of the smaller firearms manufacturers that sell a low priced product, to try and still make a reasonable profit, they let their new firearms out of their factory without going to the expense of a careful, post-production examination. Instead they leave that examination to the purchaser of that firearm. A purchaser I might add that will in most cases do a much closer and maybe better job on that "final" inspection.
I have followed the Kel-tec story closely and from a few different vantage points. I don't know as much about the Kel-tec PF 9 as I do about the P11 and others. But it appears that it is true that on a regular basis, a few new owners will find that his new Kel-tec malfunctions as soon as the first time at the range (we all agree we should give a brand new gun reasonable range time before we depend on it to save our life, don't we?).
But then the story always seems to play out that the new owners ships his defective firearm off to Kel-tec, it is repaired quickly, for free and done well, and then that owner goes on to have no further problems with his Kel-tec.
If my observations are incorrect, somebody please tell me. If necessary, start a new topic thread.
Comments
Have a P11 bought new, before firing it I lubed it with a teflon based grease and never had any problems with it. Don't even clean it that often. Read about the various modifications but didn't want to put that much effort into it.
Put a 40 S&W conversion slide on the P11 frame, ported barrel, and the only problem was when I purposely limp wristed it. Same gun shooting with the 357 sig barrel had two FTF with the last round in the magazine. I suspect the magazine but only had two mags with me and was low on ammo. Haven't shot the sig since.
I've got less than $650 in both guns plus the conversion barrels.
I have no problems with KelTec reliability although I have heard most of the horror stories.
I think it's a matter of the squeeky wheel, the only people you hear from are the vocal ones who had problems, the other huge majority never had a problem and therefore don't write in to complain.
I have heard as many stories about Kimbers having to be sent back as I have Kel-Tecs.
Now which is better... releasing a new model before it has had a thorough beta test mode or holding on to one forever like Rock River has been doing with their .308 rifle? Both situations make for a few unhappy customers.
Easy to carry, 7 rds (6 in mag). It does like Silvertips and that's good. Very few jams (lately just 1 FTF in last 100 rds). I put the $6 plastic mag extention on it and it does feel better (should come from the factory like this). Recoil is not really bad or even an issue.
One design complaint I have is that the mag release can be accidently hit while shooting the gun. That's not good.
Stan
Easy to shoot, not bad recoil and does indeed feed Silvertips well.
No complaints for why I bought it.
Here In KS, our CCW does not restrict us to any specific firearm or even to only carrying one firearm at a time. I figure if I have even a small doubt about my P11 it is not much more trouble to carry two of them as to carry one and a spare mag.
Just my way of doing things. Probably won't suit everyone else.