In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options
DIY Camo Dip Kit
paddin
Member Posts: 11 ✭✭
Looking for some feedback on this - www.camodipkit.com - seems like a good idea - just wondering if anyone here has done it and has first hand opinions on it.
Comments
If it is the former, there is no problem.
If it is the latter, please contact Gunbroker about advertising on the site.
http://exchange.gunbroker.com/info.asp
http://www.gunbroker.com/User/Affiliate.aspx
If you are in any way connected to site you referenced, please contact Gunbroker at the above links about advertising.
Please respond to this post, or to the email I sent you. I will leave your link alone for a while, and see if you respond.
Thanks.
So...Have any of you used such a product, and can you help paddin out with some information?
I am going to move this to Ask The Experts, which is a more appropriate forum for this request.
anyone?
Looks like you could be the first! Looks neat, I don't have a reason to use it though.
Looks like no one has used this product. Is it cheap? If so, and I were inclined to use it, I might try it out first on something I didn't care about. Maybe do a crowbar or something and see how it comes out and whether it is easy to use.
A crowbar? Nah. . .then you'd put it down somewhere and never be able to find it again! [;)]
If you're going to test it on something, I'd suggest at least testing it on something you'd actually WANT to be camo, so if it turned out OK (or even not so OK), you'd have gotten your money's worth.
For what its supposed to do (ie put a nice photographic-quality camo film on just about anything including weirdly-shaped things), I think the price is actually pretty reasonable. But in terms of overall costs, at $100 per kit, I'd say this stuff isn't cheap enough for disposable testing.
The kit comes with 20 square feet of film, but you have to realize that the dipping process wastes a lot of it, so you're not going to be able to get nearly that much in terms of coverage.
I have never tried the process myself, so I can't comment on the coating durability, but its based on hydrographing, and that technique is used for professional print finishing. I think it should be OK.
Here's a sort of pro version featured on ESPN, for another look:
http://www.camoent.com/process.htm
Note that the pro here does fairly extensive prepping of the surface to be dipped including scuffing it up and priming it before going to the film coating.