In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Kahr Arms

Mr. GunzMr. Gunz Member Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭
edited April 2008 in Ask the Experts
I haven't been on this forum in a while, but I was looking at a Kahr K-9 and K-40. The price new was around $465.00. I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with these pistols in the usual categories, reliability and accuracy?

Comments

  • Mr. GunzMr. Gunz Member Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well...i have an uncle looking at something in 9mm...how do they stack up vs like glock or springfield other similar pistols...hes just gonna shoot around with it and mabey a little idpa in a great while...any opinions or thoughts? Personal experince?
  • Mr. GunzMr. Gunz Member Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I own a small gun business. In the last two years I've experienced a number of serious failures with Kahr Handguns.

    1. PM9 - Slide would not retract with live round in chamber.
    2. PM40 - Could not be reassembled. Something was stopping the slide approximately 1/32-inch short of being fully on slide.
    3. PM9 - Cartridge exploded venting gases down through the magazine and into the frame. Frame destroyed. Magazine destroyed.

    These failures occured out of a total of about two dozen Kahr pistols sold over the period.

    During the same time frame I had the following failures with these handguns:
    1. S&W Airweight revolvers - none
    2. S&W M&P pistols - none
    3. Springfield XD & XDM - none
    4. Springfield 1911 pistols - none
    5. Glock - 1 gun exploded from using lead-bullet reloads.
    6. Kel-Tec - One gun locked up tight due to incorrect reassembly by owner; another would not close on cartridge due to crimped extractor spring.
    7. Taurus pistols - One missing grip screw; one cracked barrel (!).
    8. Colt (all) - none
    9. Taurus revolvers - none
    10. All other makes - no failures

    I am considering dropping Kahr Arms from my stock.

    Any comments or advice?
  • dcs shootersdcs shooters Member Posts: 10,870 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I would suggest the Kahr KT9093, if he is planing to shoot it a lot. It is all steel with a 4" barrel, and holds 8rds.
    If he wants one for carry, I can highly recomend the P-9. That is the one I carry the most. Sometimes I carry my P-45. The P series have a polimer frame and weigh quite a bit less.
    I have Glocks, Springfields, and HK'S, and the Kahr stacks up to them very good.
  • Isher2000Isher2000 Member Posts: 39 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I echo the other comment. I originally bought a Glock 19 for carry. I decided this was a little thick and bought the steel framed Kahr mentioned. A nice gun but too heavy for CCW. I traded it in for a P9 with the polymer frame and I really like it as a carry gun. It's a much flatter package in an IWB holster. Unlike the Glocks the Kahr's standard three dot sights are steel (night sights are optional).

    The possible down sides depending on your point of view are a long DAO trigger pull versus the safe action trigger that has a much shorter pull that feels single action. The downsizing that makes the Kahr concealable also makes the grip small for people with large hands. This is definitely one of those guns that leaves you with your pinkie curled under the magazine base. There are chopped micro Kahrs available that make the grip even smaller. Then you give up 7 to 8 rounds in the single stack Kahr magazine compared to the double stack Glock Compacts and 2 or 3 to the Glock Sub-Compacts.

    I adjusted to the DAO trigger, the relatively small grip and the reduced ammo capacity and find them to be a good trade-off for the benefits of the smaller and flatter package.

    The only other caveats I can offer from personal experience and talking to others is that the .40 S&W can get a little bouncy in a gun of this size (so can 9mm +P and +P+) and the Kahrs really need 200 plus break-in rounds before they loosen up and becomes reliable enough for carry. My Glocks have all run like a top right out of the box.

    A Kahr plus for me is that the Kahrs (with the exception of the new CW economy models) provide dove-tail slots front and rear making it easier to replace sights and to adjust the windage. I like Hienie straight 8 sights sights for carry and had these installed on my P9 with no problem. The only other change I've made is to have the trigger radiused and polished since the trigger pull is pretty much like a light DA revolver's.

    quote:Originally posted by Mr. Gunz
    Well...i have an uncle looking at something in 9mm...how do they stack up vs like glock or springfield other similar pistols...hes just gonna shoot around with it and mabey a little idpa in a great while...any opinions or thoughts? Personal experince?
  • txlawdogtxlawdog Member Posts: 10,039 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have a PM-45, it is a small 6 shot 45 acp, it is a handfull, but it throws a lot of lead down the range! I think overall, you would be happier with a Glock or a Springfield, maybe a medium sized. If I only had one gun, I don't think it would be the Kahr. They are well built and nice, but to repeat what others have said, right out of the box, my Glock is right on. Also, there is the debate about the magazine capacity. I will say that the Kahr is a small gun, at least the one I have is. I hope this all helps. Good luck!
Sign In or Register to comment.