In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
S&W opinion question
toad67
Member Posts: 13,008 ✭✭✭✭
Does the lock above the cylinder release turn you off? Wanting to add a new member to my stable but all the others are non lockers. Can't decide whether or not to let it in. Opinions?
Todd
Todd
Comments
There have been occasional rare reports of the lock accidentally engaging during firing, and I think this is what drives some people crazy.
As mentioned, it is possible to physically disable the lock if you're so inclined, and now Smith has responded to popular demand and is putting out "no lock" versions of some of its most popular guns (eg the J frame carry revolvers).
In general, I think most Smith fans think Smith put out its best guns years ago in the 1970s and before, back when all guns were still put together and tuned by gunsmiths before they left the factory. Since Smith guns basically last forever, and since used ones typically cost less than new ones (plus don't have a lock), I think many diehards simply avoid buying new ones altogether, bypassing the lock issue entirely.
If you really want a lock on your gun, external gun locks are cheap and readily available.
To be clear, I'm saying that all else being equal, I'd still rather have an older "pre-lock" gun. IMO older Smith and Wessons are still potentially a "bargain" when it comes to performance/cost, because as mentioned, they come from a now lost era of all forged steel parts, and hand craftsmanship. They're probably just never going to build them that way again.
But I wouldn't categorically reject a gun I otherwise wanted JUST because it had a lock. If the gun were otherwise priced right, and especially if I couldn't find a comparable older one without the lock, I'd still buy a lock gun. Even if we stipulate that today's Smith revolvers aren't quite as good as the ones made 40 years ago, they're definitely still better than Charter Arms, Taurus, and arguably still better than Rugers
I may be just getting old and opinionated, but, comparing the new Smiths to my no dash K & N frames will just astound you. There is no comparison, just the name. It is indeed, very sad.
W.D.
Most of us "OLD SCHOOLER's", dis-like the locks. It is like it almost adds profanity to the looks of the revolver's. We also prefer the guns, with the hammer mounted firing pin, over the frame mounted ones.
We figure that the most important safety device we have, is God given, not man given.
As far as the Taurus goes...locked or not, sometimes, they are a 50/50 proposition, on getting the hammer back, in either single action, or double action mode.
Best
JIM...............