In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Winchester Model 94 30 WCF (1943)

mjbmxzmjbmxz Member Posts: 1,096 ✭✭✭✭
edited December 2013 in Ask the Experts
What I have here is a customers Winchester Model 94 30 WCF (1943). I don't know anything about them really, so I'm hoping you folks could help me give this gentleman an answer to what condition it is, and possibly a value. I have some pics here to share. Any help is greatly appreciate, once again. [:D]

Winny6_zps3915ed12.jpg

ResizedImage_1386722099875_zpsb1d221a4.jpg

winny8_zps459fe0aa.jpg

IMG_20131210_1007574021_zpsf8ec3947.jpg

IMG_20131210_1007574021_zpsf8ec3947.jpg

IMG_20131210_100738862_zpsc301e1c1.jpg

IMG_20131210_100734431_zpse9b8879b.jpg

Comments

  • rufe-snowrufe-snow Member Posts: 18,650 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Cosmetics is always a big deal to collectors of vintage Winchesters. Unfortunately the left side of the receiver seems to have surface rusted, probably due to improper storage. The mottled appearance is brought, about when the rust is cleaned off with a abrasive. Due to the camera angle and lighting it's hard to say if any deep pitting has occurred due to the rusting.


    Probably would be a high dollar 94. Specially given DOM during W W II. The appearance pretty much kills it though. If the pitting isn't all that deep, more than likely would be a good candidate for restoration.
  • XXCrossXXCross Member Posts: 1,379 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Looks to me like it would be a good candidate for an engraving job.
    (they love flat sided Winchesters)
  • tsr1965tsr1965 Member Posts: 8,682 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I agree with rufe. With the scraped up stock, and the pitting on the left side of the reciever, you are looking at a possible 50% condition. You have a possible $400.00-500.00 shooter.

    As for the year it was made, we will need the whole serial, except the last two digits to give you an accurate time slot. Chances are, that if you aged it from the Blue Book, it is a bouple years older than it's guestimate.

    Best
  • GrasshopperGrasshopper Member Posts: 17,041 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    http://www.GunBroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=379604606
    I just sold this one for a shooter,,soclose, imo,,BUT I AM NOT AN EXPERT HERE-
  • kylewkylew Member Posts: 95 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I am no real expert but here goes. It is not possible that this carbine was made in 1943. The total production for model 94's in 1943 was 0. The serial number to be made during WW2 would be very close to the following. 12-41 to 8-45 ser # 1,305,000 to 1,345,000. total production during those years very close to 40,000. So 12-41 to 12-42 total = 29,000. 1-43 to 12-43 = 0. 1-44 to 12-44 = 13. 1-45-to 8-45 = 8,800. That is as close as I have been able to find. My guess from looking at this carbine is 1947 or later.
  • Mod1892Mod1892 Member Posts: 120 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Hello,

    Please post the full serial number and we can tell you when the rifle was manufactured. The left side condition of the rifle kills the collector interest. If the rifle were a 1947 vintage rifle it would have a flat surfaced forward barrel band and it does not.

    Michael

    Model 1892 / 61 Collector, Research, Valuation
  • Bert H.Bert H. Member Posts: 11,281 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Definitely not a 1943 vintage, as none were made in that year. There were only (13) made in the year 1944, so that to is unlikely. I suspect that it is a pre-War production Carbine, but it could be a 1945 or very early 1946. The serial number will tell the story.

    In regards to the condition, the left side of the receiver frame is lacking, as is the butt stock. I would grade it at 60% overall.

    WACA Historian & Life Member

  • mjbmxzmjbmxz Member Posts: 1,096 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thanks for the information folks! Here's the serial number. 13452XX It's a shame the right side of the gun is decent, the left side, well you can tell by the pics. I'm curious as how the heck the left stock got so chewed up!
  • Bert H.Bert H. Member Posts: 11,281 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    October 1945.

    WACA Historian & Life Member

  • charliemeyer007charliemeyer007 Member Posts: 6,572 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The left side pattern reminds me of damp wool damage. The stock looks like unprotected scabbard damage from rubbing on something.
  • mjbmxzmjbmxz Member Posts: 1,096 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thanks fellas! It's safe to tell my customer it's in 60% condition in a $400-500 value?
Sign In or Register to comment.