In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
44 mag
headboy
Member Posts: 164 ✭✭✭
About 3 weeks ago I posted a question about what type 44 I should buy, and I got some good advice. I went in to town and bought a 4" SS rubber grip S&W. I want to tell those who answered my questions and recommended the S&W Thanks, It shoots just fine and handles a mag load real nice without much kick, what I really like about it is it's balance it does not jump around in your hand when firing a mag load it comes stright up like a good weapon should.
Thanks again
Harry
Thanks again
Harry
Comments
I have a S/W 629 44 mag that I am considering taking hog hunting and I am also considering a red dot type scope. Not really needing magnification bc shots will be under 50 yrds.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Sight in with the load and distance you use.
EDIT, it had a Tasco PDPII.
Those type of sights are great for that application, as long as you get a decent one, and not a $50.00 cheapy that will fall apart. The type like the C-More' rail sight, Gilmore(which I believe Leupold now markets), Burris Fast Fire 3 series, are good starting points. I use the C-More, on a Ruger Redhawk, and a S&W 657, both in 41 magnum. The key to the better ones, are two fold. You can get ones with a smaller dot, and you can also get ones with intensity adjustment, that will go low enough, for you to not loose your target in low lighting conditions. At the ranges you are talking about, the latter is of more importance than a 3MOA, vs a 7MOA dot.
A lot of folks are diving into the "lighted reticle" fad. There is nothing wrong that, unless you go cheap, and it is not able to be adjusted to be dim enough. In low light, a bright reticle, will make your target dissappear behind it.
Best
Its a lot easier to see than iron sights, especially in dim light, that's for sure! Its also faster to line up.
There is a little more "jiggle" compared to iron sights, so you do have to get used to that if you've never tried a red dot before.
As mentioned, biggest caveat is that MUST get a quality sight. . .the cheapies won't hold zero, make a blurry dot that's fatiguing on the eyes, and also run through batteries quickly. The latter is a big issue, because if you accidentally leave the sight on, next time you pick up the gun, the dot will be DEAD. The newest generation of sights can run up to a full year on a single battery, an in practice, some people just leave them on at all time!
A .44 magnum will probably destroy one of the sub $100 dot sights in only a few shots.
Also, you MUST get a good mount. Bad mount won't hold zero, and can even fly off the gun under recoil!
I have a 629 and have been using a Burris Fast Fire III on it. Have been very pleased with it.
That's exactly what I use for deer hunting. I like the low-profile "reflex" style red dot for a handgun, rather than the tube style, but either work. I am WAY more accurate with the red dot compared to open sights. I can keep a decent size group out to 50 yards or just a little further.
My setup looks a lot like this:
I don't shoot full house loads, but my reloads pack a wallop.
Probably 200 plus rounds and the sight has functioned flawlessly.