In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Heritage arms barrel length question

The DuckstrapThe Duckstrap Member Posts: 8 ✭✭
edited July 2014 in Ask the Experts
Hi everyone,
I'm considering the purchase of a Heritage arms .22 revolver and I was wondering about the barrel length. I will be using this gun strictly for use on my trap line so all shots will be up close and wondered if the difference between a 6" and a 4 3/4" barrel would make any difference in anything.
I'm leaning toward the 4 3/4 for the compact size.
Thanks,
rick

Comments

  • MIKE WISKEYMIKE WISKEY Member Posts: 10,042 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    "I'm leaning toward the 4 3/4 for the compact size."..........for your use, the shorter one would be better imo.
  • charliemeyer007charliemeyer007 Member Posts: 6,572 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    There isn't much difference in the weight, handiness or the sight radius between the two. I like longer bbl.'s but I tend to shoot rifle distance with a handgun.
  • beantownshootahbeantownshootah Member Posts: 12,776 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by The Duckstrap
    Hi everyone,
    I'm considering the purchase of a Heritage arms .22 revolver and I was wondering about the barrel length. I will be using this gun strictly for use on my trap line so all shots will be up close and wondered if the difference between a 6" and a 4 3/4" barrel would make any difference in anything.
    I'm leaning toward the 4 3/4 for the compact size.
    Thanks,
    rick


    I agree with you and MIKE WISKEY, for your purpose, the shorter overall length of the 4-3/4" gun will make it easier to carry and handle. That's the one you want.

    Main advantages of a 6" barrel gun are longer sight radius (potentially making the gun a little easier to aim) and slight increase in velocity (probably about 80fps with most ammo types).

    For shooting small things at a distance, these could offer some benefit, but for your purpose, no.
  • The DuckstrapThe Duckstrap Member Posts: 8 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    That's what I was thinking but quite honestly know very little about the smaller pistols as far as velocity and site plain go.
    Thanks guys
    Rick
  • FatstratFatstrat Member Posts: 9,147
    edited November -1
    I prefer the 5 1/2" barrel myself. Still plenty handy.
  • nononsensenononsense Member Posts: 10,928 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The Duckstrap,

    The shorter barrel length (bullet travel) is all used in a revolver since the cartridges are held in the cylinder, whereas it gets measured shorter when a semi-auto has to account for the chamber in the barrel.

    While the shorter barrel is more convenient and works just fine for the trap line, my concern would be the quality of the revolver and how well it will stand up to the use you want to have it for. I also wonder about parts availability and the ability to have it repaired if required. It might be a good value for the price but will it still be a good value when it needs to be repaired?

    Good Luck with your choice!

    Best.


    ADDED:

    quote: I will be using this gun strictly for use on my trap line so all shots will be up close...

    Sight radius has little to no effect on close shots just when the distances increase which is unlikely considering his needs.

    I have a better understanding than most regarding parts, function and interchangeability that most others. My point is that usually folks will choose a better quality firearm when daily use is certain and required. Not being absolutely familiar with this model but seeing the price range, sets off questioning alarm bells for me. No, price doesn't always determine quality but it can have an influence. Supposition has no bearing.

    Best.
  • FatstratFatstrat Member Posts: 9,147
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by nononsense
    The Duckstrap,

    The shorter barrel length (bullet travel) is all used in a revolver since the cartridges are held in the cylinder, whereas it gets measured shorter when a semi-auto has to account for the chamber in the barrel.

    While the shorter barrel is more convenient and works just fine for the trap line, my concern would be the quality of the revolver and how well it will stand up to the use you want to have it for. I also wonder about parts availability and the ability to have it repaired if required. It might be a good value for the price but will it still be a good value when it needs to be repaired?

    Good Luck with your choice!

    Best.



    I think that while the Heritage is certainly not top quality, it is of decent quality. And certainly up to the intended task in terms of reliability. And as nearly faithful scaled down copy of the classic Colt design, it is fairly easy to maintain. Disassembly/reassembly video's are available on Youtube. The key is proper cleaning & care with occasional complete disassembly cleaning/lubrication. And I don't see Heritage going away in the near future. So parts availability shouldn't be an issue.
    My principle concern with the standard Heritage is the lack of adjustable rear sights. They come with classic Colt "Groove in top strap" rear sight that lends itself to the accuracy problems that the classic Colts suffered from. There is a REASON why adjustable rear sights were developed for handguns. Often the guns will shoot predictably high-left/low right etc from point of aim at a given range. And it takes some practice to know how to manually adjust your aiming to overcome this. Whereas with adjustable rear sights you just adjust the sight to shoot accurately at POA.
    As for barrel length. With the longer barrel you get a slight accuracy advantage due to longer sighting radius. With the shorter barrel you lose this but gain faster ease of handling. As previously stated, I find the 5.5" barrel, which is available on the Heritage, the best compromise.
  • spasmcreekspasmcreek Member Posts: 37,717 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    the heritage is a decent econo 22 revolver..have had several and still have a 9" long barrel one...like many of the econo revolvers one of the bigger issues is the cylinder gap...I reset barrels to 0.003-4* and helps when the bang goes down the barrel instead of to the sides....heritage has fine threads and the eaa 22 has a pinned barrel..have seen cylinder gaps up to 1.017...that' a tad much..heritage site has grips and other goodies for sale
Sign In or Register to comment.