In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Flat base vs boattail bullets
hadjii
Member Posts: 976 ✭✭
So, I have another question about loading for my win 70 in 25-06. Looking over all my load data that I recorded for this rifle, an interesting anomaly popped out at me. On virtually every load I've tried, my most consistent loads have all come from boat tail bullets. Whether 100 grain, 115 or 117 grain, it really didn't seem to matter, boattails were always more consistently accurate than flat base, and for what it's worth, the nosler partitions, whether the 115 or the older 117 grain, were always the least accurate, and the hornady 117 boattails always the most consistent. Just wondering if this is weird or unusual, or if it's just me. Can't quite figure it out.
Comments
Speaking from experience working up loads for consistent accuracy for hunting rifles
You have done a good job of figuring it out. You have determined WHAT THE GUN LIKES instead of what you would like for the gun to like. You might test another same type rifle, same caliber and it not like your existing recipe. It's mainly barrel harmonics.
and Yes about Nosler Partition bullets or most any bullet designed as a hunting bullet for large game will usually be little less accurate, because they are not silhouette or target bullets.
Listen to the gun when you are testing. It's trying to tell you something about what it likes for accuracy AND
have fun testing reloads for max accuracy.
I think the word 'anomaly' if a good choice. There are generalities we can observe and record but as a point of fact, every rifle is an individual unto itself. There are no absolutes which apply to every rifle rifle and every load. So it's likes and dislikes are dependent on the testing you run to find the sweet spot and balanced load for your rifle.
I test dozens of rifles and cartridges a year and I have found some generalities to remain true but there are always the variables found in the process of reloading. In your situation, you probably have a 1:10 twist which can affect the type and style of bullets which respond best to your loads.
In general, those flat base bullets respond best to the slowest twist rate which stabilizes the bullet length. Check the benchrest shooters and that's nearly all they shoot is short jacket flat base bullets.
It's always good when you find the load your rifle likes! Turns out my hunting rifle prefers flatbase bullets my self.
If you don't mind me ask what kind of powder are you using?
Why is it a reject to you for a rifle to shoot better from a fouled bore? I know lots of folks who will check zero one last time prior to start of season, then, at seasons end, clean the rifle.
Is it that you just prefer to start each hint with a clean bore or do you hunt with a rifle that fouls quickly (i.e. muzzleloader or purely cast bullets?)
Or is it just a personal preference?
Benchrest shooters at 100-300 yards use flat base bullets, they are generally more accurate.
Target shooters firing at mid- and long range use boattail bullets because they have a higher ballistic coefficient and will shoot "closer to the wind" and carry supersonic velocity to greater ranges.
Boat tails are the "fly-better-bullet".....and Partitions have crappy accuracy in every round I have loaded them in, 30-06, 308 243, 22-250 and 223....
Like me, a slow reader has just joined in.
Another thought:
Seen an article few days ago that guy that writes about shooting and reloading said that consistently shooting boat tail bullets vs flat base bullets that the throat area of a rifle would erode faster when using the boat tailed due to the base of the boat tail bullet producing a blow torch funneled gas towards the throat where as with the flat base bullet the majority of the hot gas remained behind the bullets flat base.
HMMMMMMM
I remember seeing a video between flat and boat. I remember flat "sealed" better. that's about all I remember from that video.
Well, once you think about that it is certainly plausible.