In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Why does NJ outlaw hollow point for concealed carry?

Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,437 ******
edited March 2020 in General Discussion
I suppose y'all have heard about that guy that was arrested for having hollow points (which are legal to have in NJ, just not in your carry weapon see here: https://www.njsp.org/firearms/transport-hollowpoint.shtml). I think I remember seeing a post about it on here anyway (if folks don't know, here is a link to that story: https://www.ammoland.com/2020/03/nj-carry-licensed-security-guard-arrested-so-called-hollowpoint-ammo/#axzz6HuVjFYF6).

Regardless, the law is beyond ridiculous.  And like with all ridiculous things there is little chance there was any sort of reasonable explanation for it. I suspect the law was made out of complete ignorance of science, physics, and public safety, but was rather borne out of fear and ignorance. But there must be some basis for the law, right?  Someone didn't just dream up that hollow points bad, FMJ good, did they?  I had heard it speculated they follow the NATO guidelines for ROE.  Is there any truth to that?


Some will die in hot pursuit
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain

Comments

  • WarbirdsWarbirds Member Posts: 16,937 ✭✭✭✭

    Well the US never ratified the 1899 Hague Convention so Im not sure why we don’t use them in war.


    NJ- What a ridiculous law.

  • US Military GuyUS Military Guy Member Posts: 3,645 ✭✭✭✭
    snip . . .
    Someone didn't just dream up that hollow points bad, FMJ good, did they? 
    . . . snip
    Sure.  Why not?
    To answer your question - "why?"   Simple.  You have to keep adding straws before you can break a camel's back.

  • chmechme Member Posts: 1,471 ✭✭✭✭
    For the same reason that New jersey classifies BB guns as a firearm.

    I blame it on the water.  
  • allen griggsallen griggs Member Posts: 35,692 ✭✭✭✭
    I remember when a kid found Tony Soprano's gun and it was loaded with hollow points.   Tony's lawyer told him he was up the creek if the kid testified.
  • bpostbpost Member Posts: 32,669 ✭✭✭✭
    It is simple really, you will die from any hit even in the big toe with hollow points but be just fine if shot in the chest with a FMJ.
  • spasmcreeksrunspasmcreeksrun Member Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭
    because victims are just supposed to shoot the gun out of the perps hand whereupon they apologize for bad behaviour
  • shilowarshilowar Member Posts: 38,811 ✭✭✭
    It's NJ,  the armpit of America...this explains everything. 
  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,437 ******
    Warbirds said:

    Well the US never ratified the 1899 Hague Convention so Im not sure why we don’t use them in war.


    NJ- What a ridiculous law.


    I think it probably has more to do with the need to penetrate barriers and light armor?
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • cbxjeffcbxjeff Member Posts: 17,637 ✭✭✭✭
    Someone could get hurt by those hollow points.
    It's too late for me, save yourself.
  • Ricci.WrightRicci.Wright Member Posts: 5,127 ✭✭✭✭
    The only thing good about NJ is WAWA.
  • GrasshopperGrasshopper Member Posts: 17,041 ✭✭✭✭
     Another feel good law, but it stinks just like Passaic River in "Jersey. FMJ's IMO, as Mike states would penetrate more than a hollow point. This is just from ME shooting phone books in the day and judging from that.
  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,437 ******

    Subjectively would you rather be shot while wearing a standard LEO vest with insert plates by an expanding dish nosed hollow point or full metal jacketed ball ammo...

    IMHO the FMJ ball would have a better chance of defeating the body armor...

    I would think the dish nosed expanding hollwpoints would fail to penetrate for several reasons.

    Yes the crazy talk and myths bandied about in NJ LEO communities through the union and due to poor training saw the hollow point round be named cop killer...

    Then you get into the body armor versus bullet proof vest issue...

    Then it's terms like high powered rifle (ever here one called low power)

    And it's almost impossible to obtain a CCW in NJ - just does not happen.

    And I believe the hollow point issue in NJ was that if you used one while committing a crime you were in trouble due to sentence modifiers.

    We sold hollow points in the gun shop and we're confronted weekly by LEO's saying they were illegal - they were wrong.

    Jmho

    Mike


    You would think LEO's in NJ would want hollow points to be used by exactly everyone, so as to eliminate their risk. Why wouldn't they lobby for it?  I simply do not get it for that reason alone, but shouldn't they also be lobbying to change the law due to the possibility of over penetration?  But they get to carry the good stuff, so they probably don't care.
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • Smitty500magSmitty500mag Member Posts: 13,623 ✭✭✭✭

    Why does NJ outlaw hollow point for concealed carry?


    Because they're F'ing IDIOTS!
  • allen griggsallen griggs Member Posts: 35,692 ✭✭✭✭

    New Jersey Man Faces Jail Time for Transporting an Antique Pistol

    By CHARLES C. W. COOK February 18, 2015 8:18 PM
    Gordon Van Gilder (Image via YouTube)
    He did break the law, but the law is absurd.

    ‘Idid break the law — to my shock,” Gordon Van Gilder tells me over the phone. He sighs. “Legally, they’re right.”

    The “they” in this equation is the state of New Jersey. The “I” is Van Gilder, a 72-year-old retired schoolteacher from the town of Millville. And that “law-breaking”? Well, that could be extremely costly indeed. For transporting a 300-year-old flintlock pistol without a concealed-carry license, Van Gilder has been charged with a second-degree felony — specifically, with “unlawful possession of a handgun” — and he is facing a maximum of ten years in state prison. This, he suggests, is “unbelievable.”

    Van Gilder’s ordeal began last November, when the car he was traveling in was pulled over by police. At the time, he and a friend were on their way back from a meeting with an antique dealer. “I’m very interested in the 18th century, both here and in Britain,” he tells me over the phone. “I’ve collected a lot of 18th-century items. I have some things from the Continental Army, including some personal documents — letters and so on. But I’m more interested in the things they made. My house is full of 18th-century furniture. I have little spoons, glassware. It’s an obsession of mine. I’m not a gun collector per se, but I think they’re interesting.”

    The gun in question, Van Gilder says, “was probably made about 1765 in Belgium — for the British market.” A dealer found it in Pennsylvania, and held it for him. “I paid $800 for it. It’s a boxlock pistol, so there’s no hammer. It’s beautiful.”

    Having picked the gun up, Van Gilder and his friend first went to lunch, and then they headed home. “My friend was driving because my arm is shot,” Van Gilder recalls. On the way home, the pair were pulled over by a local sheriff. According to Van Gilder, the detaining officer told him that he wanted to search the car, and threatened him with dogs if he refused. “I didn’t mind,” he tells me, but he wanted to make sure that the officer knew that there was a flintlock pistol in the glove compartment, and that he had just purchased it. “Oh, man,” Gilder says. “Immediately, he wanted to arrest me. But when he called the undersheriff, he was told, ‘No, it’s a 250-year-old pistol; let him go.’”

    The officer did as he was told, and gave the pistol back. The next morning, however, he came back — “with three cars and three or four sheriffs.” Van Gilders says, “He told me, ‘I should have arrested you last night.’” So he did. “They led me away in handcuffs” and, at the station, “chained me by my hands and feet to a cold stainless-steel bench.”

    “I’ve never been handcuffed in my life — or arrested, even,” Van Gilder explains. “I was embarrassed and ashamed. The only prisoner there was myself: a 72-year-old English teacher. I was really ashamed.”

    Before long, Van Gilder had been charged and the gun had been taken away for “ballistics testing,” almost certainly never to be returned. (That the department believes that a ballistics test on a flintlock pistol can be useful should give you some indication of who we’re dealing with here.) “They’ve angered me,” Van Gilder concedes. “But technically, by New Jersey’s law, the officer was probably right.”

    That, sadly, is true. Indeed, according to Van Gilder’s lawyer, Evan Nappen, Gordon has fallen foul of a “fundamental flaw” in New Jersey’s law. “Classifying this pistol as a weapon,” Nappen says, “is absolutely absurd. We’re talking about a crime that carries a minimum mandatory sentence of between three and a half and five years.”

    #page#The federal government, Nappen notes, “doesn’t even consider this gun a weapon.” (By the terms of the 1968 Gun Control Act, few firearms manufactured prior to 1898 are subject to federal law.) “This is an original flintlock that predates the founding of the country, and was made before New Jersey’s laws were passed. But they’re treating it the same as if it were a .44 Magnum.” The idea that he was breaking a law, Nappen concludes, “never crossed Van Gilder’s mind. It’s an antique. He had no intention of shooting it. It wasn’t loaded. There was no flint, no powder, and no ball.”

  • kannoneerkannoneer Member Posts: 3,402 ✭✭✭✭
    What was the result? Surely someone with some sense gave the man his relic back and turned him loose. All this while actual criminals get a scolding and a slap on the wrist. With the protected class (felons), many times the felony gun charge is plea-bargained or dropped altogether. It is ludicrous.
  • pulsarncpulsarnc Member Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭✭

    Charges were dropped by the district attorney . No word if he got the gun back

    cry Havoc and let slip  the dogs of war..... 
  • US Military GuyUS Military Guy Member Posts: 3,645 ✭✭✭✭
    kannoneer said:
    snip . . .
    All this while actual criminals get a scolding and a slap on the wrist. With the protected class (felons), many times the felony gun charge is plea-bargained or dropped altogether. It is ludicrous.
    When you (the government) are in the intimidation business, you focus on intimidating those who can be - and not those who cannot be.
  • mjrfd99mjrfd99 Member Posts: 4,553 ✭✭✭
    chme said:
    For the same reason that New jersey classifies BB guns as a firearm.

    I blame it on the water.  
    It actually is punishment on firearm owners for not voting d-rat.  
    The d-rats hide the fact that almost ALL gun crime emanates from their ruined demoncrap s*** holes so they have to blame Joe Smith from Main Street  not triple felony daquan from MLK Blvd.
    God forbid they should accuse the petulant pets of their destroyed city plantations who are doing 90% of the violence. 
    BTW the d-rat prosecutor dropped the charges quietly when the story went national.  Why?  Because it was a black man who was victimized by the clueless untrained politically corrupted PD.   
    The security guard was following all the regulations, The stupid cop did not know the law. 
    The man had Critical Defense IIRC with the plastic? plug in the nose which in NJ are NOT classified as HP. 
    NJ demonrat commies hate firearm owners.  NJ firearm owners hate the d-rats. 

  • bpostbpost Member Posts: 32,669 ✭✭✭✭
    His acceptance of a search was his first mistake.  The second was giving up his right to remain silent and telling the Cop there was a gun in the car.  You do not have to consent to car searches even under threat of a dog.  Tell them no thank you politely and stand firm.  You do not ever give up your rights to remain silent so do so.
  • fatcat458fatcat458 Member Posts: 436 ✭✭✭
    l remember a Southern Boy that was a ''guest'' of Uncle Sam @ Fort Dix ,N J during the Viet Nam era... First time he ever saw snow he got very excited about it... The Drill Sgt told him it was ''Yankee Cotton'':o
Sign In or Register to comment.