.

CA Again. Unbelievable

chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 10,997 ✭✭✭✭
edited September 3 in Politics
The Democrat super majority has passed SB145 which is headed to the governor for signature.
Could not fix link. Story on Breitbart

Comments

  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 21,852 ✭✭✭✭
    (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a person convicted of a violation of subdivision (b) of Section 286, subdivision (b) of Section 287, or subdivision (h) or (i) of Section 289 shall not be required to register if, at the time of the offense, the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor, as measured from the minor’s date of birth to the person’s date of birth, and the conviction is the only one requiring the person to register. This paragraph does not preclude the court from requiring a person to register pursuant to Section 290.006.


    290.006.
     (a) Any person ordered by any court to register pursuant to the act, who is not required to register pursuant to Section 290, shall so register, if the court finds at the time of conviction or sentencing that the person committed the offense as a result of sexual compulsion or for purposes of sexual gratification. The court shall state on the record the reasons for its findings and the reasons for requiring registration.

    Very interesting.

    A 20 year old and an 11 year old?  16 and 7?

    It would be fascinating to be able to understand the motivations of this change in the law.

    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • mogley98mogley98 Member Posts: 17,612 ✭✭✭✭
    edited September 3
    You know I get an 18 year old should not be registered for diddling with a 17 year old but ten years would cover to like 9? Ewwwww
    Why don't we go to school and work on the weekends and take the week off!
  • jimdeerejimdeere Member Posts: 20,104 ✭✭✭✭
    On the bright side, maybe all the pervs in the other 49 states will move to Californica.
  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 10,997 ✭✭✭✭
    edited September 3
    (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a person convicted of a violation of subdivision (b) of Section 286, subdivision (b) of Section 287, or subdivision (h) or (i) of Section 289 shall not be required to register if, at the time of the offense, the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor, as measured from the minor’s date of birth to the person’s date of birth, and the conviction is the only one requiring the person to register. This paragraph does not preclude the court from requiring a person to register pursuant to Section 290.006.


    290.006.
     (a) Any person ordered by any court to register pursuant to the act, who is not required to register pursuant to Section 290, shall so register, if the court finds at the time of conviction or sentencing that the person committed the offense as a result of sexual compulsion or for purposes of sexual gratification. The court shall state on the record the reasons for its findings and the reasons for requiring registration.

    Very interesting.

    A 20 year old and an 11 year old?  16 and 7?

    It would be fascinating to be able to understand the motivations of this change in the law.


    The Motivation is legislation by inching bits and pieces towards their ultimate goal. 
    A more familiar term for this strategy term is "incremental approach" Sound familiars, First came NFA 1934, GCA 1968,
    Clintons Crime Bill and the Biden plan to end gun violence.
     
    Should be no surprise what the DEMOCRATs ultimate goal is. 
    Sickening!
  • NeoBlackdogNeoBlackdog Member Posts: 12,460 ✭✭✭✭
    jimdeere said:
    On the bright side, maybe all the pervs in the other 49 states will move to Californica.
    Look at you trying to find the silver lining!

  • MrMag00MrMag00 Member Posts: 364 ✭✭✭
    (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a person convicted of a violation of subdivision (b) of Section 286, subdivision (b) of Section 287, or subdivision (h) or (i) of Section 289 shall not be required to register if, at the time of the offense, the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor, as measured from the minor’s date of birth to the person’s date of birth, and the conviction is the only one requiring the person to register. This paragraph does not preclude the court from requiring a person to register pursuant to Section 290.006.


    290.006.
     (a) Any person ordered by any court to register pursuant to the act, who is not required to register pursuant to Section 290, shall so register, if the court finds at the time of conviction or sentencing that the person committed the offense as a result of sexual compulsion or for purposes of sexual gratification. The court shall state on the record the reasons for its findings and the reasons for requiring registration.

    Very interesting.

    A 20 year old and an 11 year old?  16 and 7?

    It would be fascinating to be able to understand the motivations of this change in the law.

    It's the Weiner bill. 

    The border crossing at Tijuana is heavy with sex trafficking of minors for hollywood elites. There has been many more arrests and stopping of this with the new border walls going up. This is the escape valve being put in place so they are not held accountable, using the lgbt pervs as cover story. 
  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 10,997 ✭✭✭✭
    jimdeere said:
    On the bright side, maybe all the pervs in the other 49 states will move to Californica.



    Have to agree, DEMOCRATs in CA have been emptying their prisons using the Chinese virus as an excuse to do so.  
  • mjrfd99mjrfd99 Member Posts: 4,470 ✭✭✭
    LOL  Now I know why Goofy Grape supports the rats and why the meltdown over Trump.
  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 10,997 ✭✭✭✭
    Well, its officially law now, the DEMOCRAT governor signed it into law. 
Sign In or Register to comment.