In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Democratic Bills Require Federal License to Possess Guns and Ammo

nononsensenononsense Member Posts: 10,928 ✭✭✭✭
September 9th, 2020

Democratic Bills Require Federal License to Possess Guns and Ammo, along with Bureaucratic “Determination of Suitability”

Shown is text from H.R.5717 and S.3254 mandating Federal firearms licensing.

Make no mistake about it — leaders of the Democratic party want to dismantle the Second Amendment and impose devastating new restrictions on gun owners. Companion Bills currently in Congress will require a Federal License to own ANY Firearms. The first line of the identical bills, H.R.5717 and S.3254, mandates a federal license for any American to legally “purchase, acquire, or possess a firearm or ammunition”. Yes you can’t even own ammo without a Federal license. Morever, to obtain such a license, citizens can be subject to psychological/character exams so that bureaucrats can “make a determination of suitability”. Such requirements effectively destroy the Second Amendment. Imagine if you had to obtain a license to vote, or pass a psychological “determination of suitability” before you could attend your church.

These companion bills, which have been endorsed by Joe Biden and his running mate Kamala Harris, represent the greatest legislative threat to the gun rights in the history of the country. Biden himself has called for the banning of AR15s and other modern sporting rifles, while Harris has advocated the use of Executive Action to confiscate semi-auto rifles (as was done recently in Canada).

The Jews for the Protection of Firearms Ownership (JPFO.org) have analyzed these companion bills in Congress. The JPFO states that this legislation’s “character [and] suitability” requirements for licensing would effectively eliminate the Second Amendment: “The Bill of Rights’ ban on infringement would be ignored… Unelected bureaucrats will literally choose who can bear arms [and] all existing arms in private hands will be subject to confiscation.”

The Democratic-sponsored gun control legislation, H.R.5717 and S.3254 will require current and future gun owners to pass psychology and character tests to continue owning the firearms they already legally possess. When asked, legal experts have been unable to describe how this could be applied fairly and predictably. America has an estimated 100 million gun owners. That number has grown dramatically in 2020 because of citizens’ fears over large scale rioting and intimidation by BLM and Antifa, and the demands by Democrats to “defund the police”.

The first line of the identical bills, HR5717 and S3254, requires a federal license for any American to legally “purchase, acquire, or possess a firearm or ammunition”. This is de facto infringement.

To obtain this license you would need to prove to unelected officials that you are of “sound mind and character”, you do not “potentially create a risk to public safety”, and you meet “any other requirements the State determines relevant”. Authorities, “make a determination of suitability”, for your possession and ownership of firearms, including any you currently own.

How bad are the Democratic-sponsored gun bills? Read this summary of Senate Bill 3254, sponsored by Elizabeth Warren. The provisions of companion House Bill H.R.5717 are identical.

Senate Bill 3254 Official Summary of Provisions
Gun Violence Prevention and Community Safety Act of 2020
This bill makes various changes to the federal framework governing the sale, transfer, and possession of firearms and ammunition. Among other things, the bill does the following:

— Requires individuals to obtain a license to purchase, acquire, or possess a firearm or ammunition;
— Raises the minimum age — from 18 years to 21 years — to purchase firearms and ammunition;
— Establishes new background check requirements for firearm transfers between private parties;
— Requires law enforcement agencies to be notified following a firearms-related background check that results in a denial;
— Creates a statutory process for a family or household member to petition a court for an extreme risk protection order to remove firearms from an individual who poses a risk of committing violence;
— Restricts the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession of semi-automatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices;
— Restricts the manufacture, sale, transfer, purchase, or receipt of ghost guns (i.e., guns without serial numbers);
— Makes trafficking in firearms a stand-alone criminal offense;
— Requires federally licensed gun dealers to submit and annually certify compliance with a security plan to detect and deter firearm theft;
— Removes limitations on the civil liability of gun manufacturers;
— Allows the Consumer Product Safety Commission to issue safety standards for firearms and firearm components.





Comments

  • mark christianmark christian Member Posts: 24,453 ✭✭✭✭
    Ghost guns are new, otherwise they have forgotten to include the Arsenal License which was last proposed during the Clinton administration.  
  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 14,083 ✭✭✭✭
    "Leaders of the DEMOCRAT party want to dismantle the Second Amendment.........."

    Something I have been saying all along, but your only scratching the surface of their true intent and that is and end of the entire US Constitution as we know it. 
    Been to one of their strat planning meeting and know first hand what these DAMNOCRATs  are all about. 

      
  • nononsensenononsense Member Posts: 10,928 ✭✭✭✭
    Apparently this made the rounds a year ago but has recently resurfacing through Schumer who is carrying it around in his back pocket. California is also revving up for more legislative action on the anti-gun front. Pelosi is lobbying to add 3 more justices to the Supreme Court which she thinks she can stack with Dems.
    I hadn't seen any mention of this here so I thought it should be posted.
    Best.
  • US Military GuyUS Military Guy Member Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭✭
    This should be interesting.

    I have never been a criminal before.


  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 14,083 ✭✭✭✭
    Apparently this made the rounds a year ago but has recently resurfacing through Schumer who is carrying it around in his back pocket. California is also revving up for more legislative action on the anti-gun front. Pelosi is lobbying to add 3 more justices to the Supreme Court which she thinks she can stack with Dems.
    I hadn't seen any mention of this here so I thought it should be posted.
    Best.
    Good Idea.
    The Biden-Harris Gun Safety Plan is on their website. Never been able to post a link to it, but it is far worse than licencing bill.
  • nononsensenononsense Member Posts: 10,928 ✭✭✭✭
    chiefr said:
    Apparently this made the rounds a year ago but has recently resurfacing through Schumer who is carrying it around in his back pocket. California is also revving up for more legislative action on the anti-gun front. Pelosi is lobbying to add 3 more justices to the Supreme Court which she thinks she can stack with Dems.
    I hadn't seen any mention of this here so I thought it should be posted.
    Best.
    Good Idea.
    The Biden-Harris Gun Safety Plan is on their website. Never been able to post a link to it, but it is far worse than licencing bill.
    Here is a link to their suggested course and promises:

    Best.

  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,672 ✭✭✭✭
    chiefr said:
    Apparently this made the rounds a year ago but has recently resurfacing through Schumer who is carrying it around in his back pocket. California is also revving up for more legislative action on the anti-gun front. Pelosi is lobbying to add 3 more justices to the Supreme Court which she thinks she can stack with Dems.
    I hadn't seen any mention of this here so I thought it should be posted.
    Best.
    Good Idea.
    The Biden-Harris Gun Safety Plan is on their website. Never been able to post a link to it, but it is far worse than licencing bill.
    Here is a link to their suggested course and promises:

    Best.

    That cannot be correct.  Biden has on many occasions stated that he respects the 2nd Amendment.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,672 ✭✭✭✭
    This should be interesting.

    I have never been a criminal before.


    Neither have I, but it is always fun to jump into a something new.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • mac10mac10 Member Posts: 2,701 ✭✭✭✭
    the latest bob woodward will have effect saddly
  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 14,083 ✭✭✭✭
    chiefr said:
    Apparently this made the rounds a year ago but has recently resurfacing through Schumer who is carrying it around in his back pocket. California is also revving up for more legislative action on the anti-gun front. Pelosi is lobbying to add 3 more justices to the Supreme Court which she thinks she can stack with Dems.
    I hadn't seen any mention of this here so I thought it should be posted.
    Best.
    Good Idea.
    The Biden-Harris Gun Safety Plan is on their website. Never been able to post a link to it, but it is far worse than licencing bill.
    Here is a link to their suggested course and promises:

    Best.

    That cannot be correct.  Biden has on many occasions stated that he respects the 2nd Amendment.
    Where is the green font when we need it?
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,672 ✭✭✭✭
    mac10 said:
    the latest bob woodward will have effect saddly
    I don't see it as having much of an effect, mac10.  Woodward's book shows how honest and transparent Trump actually is.  He is handling this well, as Biden goes off the deep end with his mindless ramblings when he, as the apparent nominee said and did nothing but to criticize any step Trump made that restricted anything.  

    The battle lines are fairly well established, and IMO, no one is going to vote for Biden over Trump because of this little tempest in a teapot.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
Sign In or Register to comment.