In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

What democrats said in 2016 when the rolls were reversed

Nanuq907Nanuq907 Member Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭✭
In 2016, Obama nominated Merrick Garland for the Supreme Court.  McConnell attempted to block him, and the democrats responded predictably.  Compare their words then with their words today:

Biden:  “Deciding in advance simply to turn your back before the president even names a nominee is not an option the Constitution leaves open, it’s a plain abdication from the Senate’s duty.”

Hillary:  
“Elections have consequences, the president has a responsibility to nominate a new justice and the Senate has a responsibility to vote.”

Schumer:  
“Garland has integrity, a brilliant legal mind & is a perfect fit for the Supreme Court. GOP inaction does our country a great disservice.”

Pelosi:  
“Judge Merrick Garland, is a respected jurist who must be given a fair hearing & timely vote.”

Sanders:  
“Judge Garland is a strong nominee with decades of experience on the bench. [Obama] has done his job. It’s time for Republicans to do theirs.”

Warren:  "(Republicans) 
must ditch their extremism and schedule a vote for Garland".

Reid:  
“It would be unprecedented in recent history for the Supreme Court to go a year with a vacant seat, failing to fill this vacancy would be a shameful abdication of one of the Senate’s most essential Constitutional responsibilities.”

Comments

  • spasmcreeksrunspasmcreeksrun Member Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭
    QUACK  QUACK  QUACK
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,672 ✭✭✭✭
    In 2016 the Republicans were saying what the Democrats are saying now and the Democrats were saying what the Republicans are saying now.

    Consistency would be nice, I guess, but consistency requires principles, something that is in very limited supply in the Capitol Building. 
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 14,083 ✭✭✭✭
    But....its different when DEMOCRATs do it. Perfectly acceptable and dirty filthy corrupt media always sides with the DEMOCRATs 
  • mac10mac10 Member Posts: 2,701 ✭✭✭✭
    i smelled cheese and gaged
  • mark christianmark christian Member Posts: 24,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited September 2020
    Ginsberg is/was the problem. The woman had been undergoing treatment for cancer and various other illness for the past twenty years. She could have resigned here seat on the court any time between 2008-2014 when the Democrats held the majority in the Senate, which could have confirmed any Obama nominee. But RBG enjoyed publicity, and being a dying and retired Supreme Court Justice means that you're forgotten.  
  • Nanuq907Nanuq907 Member Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭✭

    Yep. I think she believed Hillary would win and was holding out to retire and have her seat replaced under the first woman president. She overplayed her hand and then couldn’t make it to another term. Hubris.

Sign In or Register to comment.