In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania And Wisconsin At US Supreme Court Over Election

serfserf Member Posts: 9,217 ✭✭✭✭

I wonder if they will pick this up for review much less ligated it but we will see.

serf

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/texas-sues-georgia-michigan-pennsylvania-and-wisconsin-supreme-court-over-election

Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.…


This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.

Comments

  • serfserf Member Posts: 9,217 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2020

    The whole world is on the agenda and Trump was not playing ball with them. That is why they must circumvent what is left of judo-christian beliefs to establish trans humanism NWO with a g_d less governor now. In God We Trust is just a slogan now.

    Science has and will replace g-d to many converts with Trans humanism and proclaim we are not superstitious anymore.

    serf

  • TRAP55TRAP55 Member Posts: 8,291 ✭✭✭

    The left is already trying to discredit Paxton for filing this. As I understand it, this State vs State suit goes straight to the SCOTUS, no lower court dismissals.

  • Floyd621Floyd621 Member Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2020

    Just heard the Supreme Court has rejected Trump's Pennsylvania lawsuit.. looks like Biden gets it..

  • serfserf Member Posts: 9,217 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2020

    Yep rubber stamped! "This ship has sailed." & The Supreme Court is behind The NWO 100% in my opinion. They have washed their hands just like with Pilate did with Christ. Next, Gun confiscation with assault weapons being deemed not guarantee under the 2nd amendment in The Bill of Rights.

    But they have one last chance with The Texas lawsuit still I think.


    serf

    https://www.npr.org/2020/12/08/944230517/supreme-court-rejects-gop-bid-to-reverse-pennsylvania-election-results

    After waiting over a year to challenge Act 77, and engaging in procedural gamesmanship along the way, they come to this Court with unclean hands and ask it to disenfranchise an entire state," they wrote. "They make that request without any acknowledgment of the staggering upheaval, turmoil, and acrimony it would unleash."

  • Ditch-RunnerDitch-Runner Member Posts: 25,228 ✭✭✭✭

    MY wife told me a short time ago

    several more states ( named them but I do not remember them al )l and maybe more joining Texas in the suit also asking people to call there state and push for them to sign on with the group

    what I gather the SCOUS did not refuse the lawsuit just holding off possible to put them all together

    if that fails well the crap will hit the fan and the monkeys will flinging the poo for sure

  • mark christianmark christian Member Posts: 24,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2020

    Under the Constitution, states with legal complaints against other states have a right to sue them in the Supreme Court without first going through a lower court, but they need a majority Justices’ consent to do so. Arguments over water rights is one of the more typical law suits between states.  If the court denies a motion to file, that ends the case. If the Court allows the lawsuit, the case unfolds just as any lawsuit would in with the gathering of evidence to present at a trial. The Court customarily farms this out to an individual known as a “special master” who gathers the evidence and recommends a decision for the Justices to consider.

    Keep in mind that the states being sued have the right to oppose the motion to file the lawsuit, and to defend against it. This entire matter could take months, or even years to resolve. In the meantime, Trump is out, Biden can't be sworn in, and Pelosi becomes President.

  • serfserf Member Posts: 9,217 ✭✭✭✭

    But the court has to give restitution to the suing states if they won.right? Like a free stolen election token or something in 2024? (Green Font)

    It's dictator time!

    serf

  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,672 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2020

    With all due respect, Mark, this is not correct.


    Article 2, Section 1, and Amendment 12 state the following:


    (Taken from the 12th)


    ...The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice...


    So, should the electors from these four states not be seated, and Biden therefore does not reach 270, the election will be thrown to the House where each state gets but a single vote. Currently the make up of House, though controlled by the democrats, consists of a majority of Republican controlled delegations Therefore, were all delegations to vote along party lines, the disqualification of these four swing states would potentially result in a majority vote for Trump in the House.


    There is no path to a Pelosi Presidency absent the near concurrent deaths or disability of the sitting POTUS and VPOTUS.

    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • mark christianmark christian Member Posts: 24,453 ✭✭✭✭

    I stand corrected.

  • serfserf Member Posts: 9,217 ✭✭✭✭

    Texas is now supported by Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Tennessee.

    serf

  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,381 ******

    This suit is going exactly nowhere. Even if it does, the result would be (at best) "do better next time". Anyone holding to hope this is going to give Trump a victory is delusional.

    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • Nanuq907Nanuq907 Member Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭✭


    I admire the heck out of a man that will take public correction, standing on his own 2 feet with his chin held high.

    Well done. This is what Leaders look like.

  • serfserf Member Posts: 9,217 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2020

    The election laws that bind our Union was violated and The legislators should have known long before allowing this to happen. Either They do a new election or there will be a very deep trouble for us all. It's the only answer that would address the process to be fair and unadulterated. Any other way is sheer stupidity.

    This is not about 3 counties in Florida the last time The supreme court ruled on the election,it's much more at stake here this time. Bet on it.

    serf

  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,381 ******

    You probably still believe Hillary will be tried for her emails or that Obama will do time for Fast and Furious.

    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • truthfultruthful Member Posts: 2,117 ✭✭✭✭

    Just read that now it is up to 17 states that have joined the suit. Will the SCOTUS refuse to hear the case? Roberts cannot be trusted, so if it is he alone that decides ........

  • hillbillehillbille Member Posts: 14,393 ✭✭✭✭

    thought I heard on radio they announced early afternoon they would hear the case, not sure when though.......

  • Floyd621Floyd621 Member Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭✭

    They stole the election right in front of the world and think they will get by with it...and probably will...sad times..

  • Floyd621Floyd621 Member Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭✭

    And they just denied it.... hello swamp...

  • Ditch-RunnerDitch-Runner Member Posts: 25,228 ✭✭✭✭

    scous just proved how deep the BS runs

    basic told the people go pound sand

    I am just amazed with all the states signed on all evidence and swore statements and politicians even signing on and the

    all knowing and great court declares who we looked to to stand up for the right thing to do sorry bout your luck

    we are are screwed so many ways

  • Floyd621Floyd621 Member Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭✭

    Cheating seems to be the best way to win anymore... being honest gets you nowhere fast....oh-well bye-bye bang bangs I guess..

  • serfserf Member Posts: 9,217 ✭✭✭✭

    Just another stab in the back for the elites to get us in order for The NWO take over. Biden probably will sail through any tight spots with The China investigation and begin free trade with them again with technology advances if they play ball in The U.N.

    Say bye bye to your gun rights too. The private use of military type weapons will be curtailed then banned in short order. Don't look for The Supreme court to interpret the 2nd amendment other than for sporting use only like a shotgun or single shot deer rifle in the end. A pistol will be limited to ten rounds too.


    serf

Sign In or Register to comment.