In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

Photos of what I did '71

Rocky RaabRocky Raab Member Posts: 14,189 ✭✭✭✭
edited January 2010 in US Military Veteran Forum
Here's a shot refueling my favorite plane, tail number 014. Note there are no other markings or insignia other than those three digits. VERY covert mission. (Yes, everything was that red. We all wore pink undies LOL!)

BLIVET.jpg

And here is a shot that is almost certainly me. I remember this night combat mission very well, and largely due to that really nasty weather over Cambodia - where I was going.

ENDRUNWY.jpg
I may be a bit crazy - but I didn't drive myself.

Comments

  • Options
    Dundee TomDundee Tom Member Posts: 9 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ah, the push-pull Cessna 337 Skymaster/"Mixmaster." Marvelous plane to fly: stable, no asymetric thrust if an engine is lost, and good fuel consumption for a twin. Great FAC platform. Always wanted to own one after flying the turbo-pressurized version.[8D]
  • Options
    Dave Fisher15Dave Fisher15 Member Posts: 8 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    We called them plames a Suck and Blow
  • Options
    Dave Fisher15Dave Fisher15 Member Posts: 8 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    We called them planes a Suck and Blow sin loi for the blind fingers
  • Options
    Rocky RaabRocky Raab Member Posts: 14,189 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Tom, the turbo-pressurized one sounds like a different airplane. Then again, we flew them 10% over max gross weight for our NORMAL takeoff weight, and I launched one black night almost 25% over. Rolled 5,000 feet and only lifted off when I bounced off the rocks at the end of the overrun.

    In our normal configuration, we could get no more than 500 fpm climb rate, and 300 was more usual if it was hot. It absolutely would not maintain altitude on the front engine alone, and might not on the rear alone. With rocket pods on, you could dive it at full power and not get up to the redline of 173 knots. We called it the Sky Pig.
    I may be a bit crazy - but I didn't drive myself.
  • Options
    Dundee TomDundee Tom Member Posts: 9 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    The standard 337 wasn't a hot performer, for sure. I thought the military version had either larger engines than the standard's 0-360 Lycomings, or was blown. 'Course, you guys carried a load and a half!

    Hats off to you.

    I did like the turbo/pressurized version, for sure.
  • Options
    Rocky RaabRocky Raab Member Posts: 14,189 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Standard O-360s and variable props.

    I'm told that max gross for the nearest civvie version was 4400 pounds. My daily go weight was 4850, and that night I described, I rolled at 5400. I think my knuckles were white for two weeks ...
    I may be a bit crazy - but I didn't drive myself.
  • Options
    Dundee TomDundee Tom Member Posts: 9 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I can relate. I had some icing in my 250 Comanche that was right out of the textbook and my knuckles practically glowed in the dark.[xx(]
  • Options
    Rocky RaabRocky Raab Member Posts: 14,189 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I hate to tarnish the image of a the brass-cajoned, steely-eyed FAC, but I darn near shat when I felt that big bang and lurch - until I realized I was sorta-kinda flying afterward.

    I'll never know if I actually rolled the whole 5,000 feet plus overrun and then hit a rock, or simply drifted off the edge near the end and hit something there, though. Because our runway was outside the wires, in bad guy land, we had to take off blacked out - plane AND runway.

    If that scares, you, we LANDED that way, too. No foolin'.
    I may be a bit crazy - but I didn't drive myself.
  • Options
    Dundee TomDundee Tom Member Posts: 9 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Have some kind of ILS/MLS set-up?
  • Options
    Rocky RaabRocky Raab Member Posts: 14,189 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Nope. No published approach to that field. We had a TACAN nearby from which many of us "cobbled up" our own approaches, but that's it.

    At night, we'd come in over the nearby city, keeping known buildings/lights aligned as much as possible and start the stopwatch over a known one. Then we'd aim for the blackest hole ahead of us - which was the blacked-out airport. If the bad guys heard our engines, the "rainbow arch" of tracers usually crossed over the field, which helped!

    When we thought we were about 15 seconds from touchdown, we'd radio the two jeeps who had raced out of the compound (with their lights out) and faced each other 1,000 feet down the runway. At our call, they'd flip on their headlights and we'd slip, crab or somehow throw the plane between them, slam down and roll out on the compass. As soon as we passed them, the jeeps would kill all lights and roar off behind us down the runway to the far end, where the only taxiway was.

    Everybody thought that the guys in the jeeps had the scariest job.
    I may be a bit crazy - but I didn't drive myself.
  • Options
    Dundee TomDundee Tom Member Posts: 9 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think I'd have turned the lights on, then retreated to a safer place. Still flying?
  • Options
    airmungairmung Member Posts: 579 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Skymaster, Skysmasher, Skythrasher, Huff and Puff, Suck and Blow, Bugsmasher, Duck, Push-Pull, Push-me Pull-you, Sky Pig, The B.S. Bomber and other names apply to the Cesna 337 variants. They all had Continental IO-360, 210 HP, 6 cylinder engines, the T337 (turbocharged) and P337 (pressurized) had TSIO 360 series engines (turbo-supercharged-fuel injected-opposed). The pressurized airplanes used larger-capacity turbochargers to provide bleed air for pressurizing the cabin. None had Lycoming engines. All had a 30 knot built-in headwind, with marginal single-engine performance (the remaining operating engine usually just takes you to the scene of the crash).
    I have maintained many 337 series airplanes and 1 336 over the years. They aren't especially mechanic-friendly, especially the pressurized ones. For my money a Piper Seneca II-III-IV-V is a much better airplane, but the O-2 certainly filled its niche well.
  • Options
    sandwarriorsandwarrior Member Posts: 5,453 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    We had one at our A&P school in Helena. It was a turbo'd 337. But I don't remember if it was pressurized. It flew in and one of the instructors with a pilots license took it up. He's flown a bunch of them before. His thought was like airmungs'. If you're carrying anything, even extra fuel, the good engine is only going to take you a little further along to the site of the crash.

    I'm not a pilot, but I did a lot of commuting on company planes when I worked for Butte Aviation. In the mornings it was a Seneca II and in the afternoons it was anything from a C-182, C-210, PA-31-350, PA-28-T200 (lead sled), C-402 even C-414/Ram IV. Of all of them I liked the Chieftain the best. Although, I'd have to say the 402 had a better wing under you in case something did happen. When I worked for another company in Billings they had Aero Commanders. Those were a trip. Great plane.
  • Options
    Rocky RaabRocky Raab Member Posts: 14,189 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Tom, the field was under civilian control (not many people know that Vietnam had commercial airlines - sorta). But they locked the tower - and the light controls - at sunset. We tried putting one of our pilots in the tower when we flew nights to control the lights and radio, but he was alone up there, outside the wire and completely vulnerable. I pulled that duty once, and felt like a bullet magnet. I was used to being shot at in a plane, but sitting there in one place scared the bejabbers out of me.

    I haven't flown in years. The dollars went to daughters, and after a while, it simply got too expensive. I miss it, though.
    I may be a bit crazy - but I didn't drive myself.
  • Options
    Dundee TomDundee Tom Member Posts: 9 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Me, too, Rocky. Me, too. Had a Mooney, Bellanca Viking (sweet!) and a 250 Comanche (very utilitarian with its space and load capabilities). Trouble is, I wasn't wealthy and I had to give it all up after getting all the ratings. But I've got some wonderful memories...[;)]
  • Options
    johnhardyjohnhardy Member Posts: 11 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    We called them beautiful!!!
    A2/5 1ACD
  • Options
    Dundee TomDundee Tom Member Posts: 9 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Works for me, johnhardy. Happy New Year![;)]
Sign In or Register to comment.