In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Henry Kissinger New World Order 2007 Speech!

serfserf Member Posts: 8,875 ✭✭✭✭
edited April 2014 in Politics
For all you doubters out there,just watch the coming Of The NWO along with a threat of global war if you don't comply!See youtube link below.

serf

Henry Kissinger New World Order!

Comments

  • DaveJDaveJ Member Posts: 395 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Kissinger also brokered the 1975 memorandum of understanding that robs us of our oil and ships it to Israel. He should be called " Mr. Mossad ".
  • serfserf Member Posts: 8,875 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by DaveJ
    Kissinger also brokered the 1975 memorandum of understanding that robs us of our oil and ships it to Israel. He should be called " Mr. Mossad ".


    Yeah,He sure has his finger in the pie and The NWO with the rich elites are backing him because he is so intelligent and foreseeing master of history!

    serf

    http://www.infiniteunknown.net/2013/12/05/henry-kissinger-quotes-on-depopulation-and/

    What we in America call terrorists are really groups of people that reject the international system."
    - Henry Kissinger 2007
  • Waco WaltzWaco Waltz Member Posts: 10,821
    edited November -1
    "Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to
    restore order . Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true
    if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether
    real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that
    all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The
    one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this
    scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the
    guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."

    ? Dr. Henry Kissinger, Evians, France, 1991

    << Quotations on the
    New World Order, 1918 to 1995


    "The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day's sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow." -- Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915




    "The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world." -- M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)




    "If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands." -- Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book "International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World" (1931)




    "... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people." -- H. G. Wells, in his book entitled "The New World Order" (1939)




    "The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a 'League of Nations' or a 'Federated Union' to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the 'New International Order,' 'The New World Order,' 'World Union Now,' 'World Commonwealth of Nations,' 'World Community,' etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual." -- excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)




    "In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of 'justice and peace.'" -- excerpt from article entitled "New World Order Pledged to Jews," in the New York Times (October 1940)




    "If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order." -- The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states.




    "New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor" -- title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)




    "Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis." -- text of article in the Philadelphia Inquirer (June 1942)




    "The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God." -- American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in the New York Times (December 1942)




    "There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper." -- Norman Thomas, in his book "What Is Our Destiny" (1944)




    "He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order." -- excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in the Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)




    "The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, 'has not been able--nor can it be able--to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.' ... The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, 'urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'" -- Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled "Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order" -- New York Times (February 1962)




    "The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order." -- Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)




    "He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building 'a new world order.'" -- excerpt from an article in the New York Times (February 1972)




    "If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis ... In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault." -- Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)




    "The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species." -- Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled "Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions," in the book "On the Creation of a Just World Order" (1975)




    "My country's history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order." -- Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)




    "At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt's time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order." -- part of article in the New York Times (November 1975)




    "A New World Order" -- title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H. Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)




    "Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order." -- Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)




    "We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms." -- Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in the Washington Post (May 1991)




    "We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt's and Winston Churchill's vision for peace for the post-war period." -- Richard Gephardt, in the Wall Street Journal (September 1990)




    "If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long." -- President George Bush (January 1991)




    "But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush's mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council." -- excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in the New York Times (January 1991)




    "I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a 'new world order' based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court." -- George McGovern, in the New York Times (February 1991)




    "... it's Bush's baby, even if he shares its popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler 'new order' root; F.D.R. used the phrase earlier." -- William Safire, in the New York Times (February 1991)




    "How I Learned to Love the New World Order" -- article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in the Wall Street Journal (April 1992)




    "How to Achieve The New World Order" -- title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)




    "The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth - in Morocco - to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund." -- part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in the New York Times (April 1994)




    "New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State" -- title of article by Kenichi Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in the Wall Street Journal (August 1994)




    The "new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all." -- Nelson Mandela, in the Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)




    The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important "for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order." -- President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in the New York Times (April 1995)




    "Alchemy for a New World Order" -- article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)




    "We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." -- Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)




    These quotations, and many others like them, demonstrate clearly that this words "new world order" have been in use for decades, and did not originate with President George Bush in 1990. The "old world order" is one based on independent nation-states. The "new world order" involves the elimination of the sovereignty and independence of nation-states and some form of world government. This means the end of the United States of America, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as we now know them. Most of the new world order proposals involve the conversion of the United Nations and its agencies to a world government, complete with a world army, a world parliament, a World Court, global taxation, and numerous other agencies to control every aspect of human life (education, nutrition, health care, population, immigration, communications, transportation, commerce, agriculture, finance, the environment, etc.). The various notions of the "new world order" differ as to details and scale, but agree on the basic principle and substance.

    >>WILL WE BE FREE
    OR CORPORATE SERFS
    REPUBLIC OR EMPIRE? ... THE NEW WORLD ORDER

    By: William Kaliher



    "What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil."#8232;(Christian Science Monitor editorial, June 19th, l920)#8232;
    #8232;#8232;This article was stimulated by the 9-11 terrorist acts. It is intended as an overview and meant for readers with a better than basic understanding of world history, this country's foundations and the question of empire versus republic. The author will not address the underlying arguments of his statements and theses. Each basic thesis would require several books to address fully. The liberal reader will actually like many of my comments concerning corporations. Unfortunately, the liberal reader will have no idea what the commentary means or why the arguments are important.#8232;
    #8232;"Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government - a bureaucratic elite."#8232;(Senator William Jenner, 1954)#8232;
    #8232;#8232;The United States was designed to be a somewhat isolationist nation. One might argue that is true except for international trade. However, that would be an incorrect argument. The founders expected our nation to engage in trade, but they did not expect trade to be tied to government policies. The nation would act to protect free trade, as was the case with the Barbary pirates. But the nation would not act to ensure an American company's profitable trade. The free trade debate still rages today. However, with government intertwined with large corporations, the country cannot respond based on the merit of free trade, but must act based on corporate interests and desires.#8232;#8232;
    "We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."#8232;(David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission,June, 1991)#8232;
    #8232;#8232;The government doesn't react based on the needs of the nation, but on the needs of those controlling super corporations. There are many sickening examples of corporate-owned government. The recent Goldman-Sachs bailout by the Clinton administration, the Savings and Loans banking scandals under both political parties (John McCain and four Democrat Senators helped steal 3.4 billion from the taxpayer in the Charles Keating S&L alone. The Bush family and Clinton cronies got their shares also in a demonstration of bipartisanship all too common when it comes to robbing the average citizen) and the political crony filled Bank of Credit and Commerce International, BCCI, (estimates are over 20 billion dollars) are but three recent examples of American citizens being shaken down and/or required to underwrite the financial blunders of crooked politicians and super-rich corporate investors.#8232;#8232;
    "The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one- world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."#8232;(Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was#8232;shot down by the Soviets)#8232;
    #8232;#8232;Perhaps an even more extreme example of the loss of American power, prestige and honor is involved when one examines the Japanese-American business arrangement. Japan is relatively free to block the introduction of American goods into their economy. An American government laden with corporate special interests and involvement in personal schemes by a few businessmen is unable to force fair, much less free, trade with Japan.#8232;#8232;
    "The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups."#8232;(Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University, highly esteemed by his former student, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton. )#8232;
    #8232;#8232;The solution to the Japanese trade problem would be simple and swift with a Congress free of business control. The Congress envisioned by the Founders would close the borders to all Japanese trade. America can afford economic isolation, but Japan cannot. The current situation could have never happened with a Congress loyal to the American people. Were such a Congress seated the Japanese would find a way to institute fair and free trade conditions with just the slightest indication they could lose our market.#8232;#8232;
    "The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes."#8232;(Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952)#8232;
    #8232;With the solution being so simple, why do we allow the current situation to linger? The answer is once again the fat cats owning Congress. A few people have millions if not billions involved with our current Japanese relationship. They would lose if we had a Congress concerned with the citizen's interest, instead of worrying about the kickbacks the fat-cats throw them and their place in the New World Order.#8232;#8232;
    "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."#8232;(Woodrow Wilson,The New Freedom (1913)#8232;
    #8232;One does not have to return to President Eisenhower's warning of the military-industrial complex to understand and fear corporate ownership of American politicians. It isn't that recent. The problems associated with government controlled by businesses started long before the 1950s. Although the robber barons of the 1800s corrupted politicians, my concerns don't begin with them. The robber barons were American patriots, and though twisting the capitalist system, they were for it and for the country.#8232;#8232;
    "We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world."#8232;(Professor Arnold Toynbee, in a June l931 speech before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.)?#8232;
    #8232;The real danger of corporate control of government started early in the turn of the last century. When the petroleum industry bought enough politicians to pass specialized corporate welfare, the real problems begin. The immediate result was other forms of energy could no longer compete with big oil. Steam and electric engines were, for all intent and purposes, unfairly killed as oil alternatives. America lost nearly a hundred years of development and experiments with steam, electricity and solar energy, to name three possible energy alternatives. Nearly a hundred years later this trouble from government tampering with the capitalist system continues to cost Americans economically and politically.#8232;#8232;
    "The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties."#8232;(New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922)#8232;
    #8232;Today, many justifiably question G. W. Bush's war with Afghanistan. Does it have anything to do with terrorism, or do large corporate interests want control of Afghanistan for ulterior purposes? I am beginning to think the war is for business interests, and not for what the 9-11 terrorists did, and will address those reasons after the economic part of this article.#8232;#8232;
    "We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money."#8232;(Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)#8232;
    #8232;And#8232;#8232;
    "The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind."#8232;(George Herbert Walker Bush)?
  • spasmcreekspasmcreek Member Posts: 38,925
    edited November -1
    all hail the NWO...and goodbye to AMERICA...sold out by its "leaders"
Sign In or Register to comment.