In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
If the News Media has the Best Interests
Of the USA and the World in mind, instead of their political agenda, they'd give accurate unslanted reporting of the various candidates. In so doing they'd report that Hillary Clinton demonstrated a severe lack of ethics since the time she was the first woman of Arkansas. Her experience consists of one term as US Senator from New York and one term as Secretary of State, both of which were at best mediocre and at worst criminally negligent.
So why could any such person be considered a shoo-in for the presidency? Inquiring minds want to know- and we sure aren't getting any answers from the media.
So why could any such person be considered a shoo-in for the presidency? Inquiring minds want to know- and we sure aren't getting any answers from the media.
Comments
I do find it interesting that many are concerned with the GOP (Conservative) candidate being a "good candidate" . The only way I see one being worse than Hillary with her track record and history would be one with a criminal record. [:D]