In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Sandy Hook Forensic Evidence ! Smoking Gun?
This is very interesting Data Folks! It cast a shadow over who and what happen that day tragic day!
serf
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1012004/pg1
His DNA found was found on the side of the Mark .22 that was used to shoot his mother, and possibly on the barrel end.
His DNA was not found on the bullets, the trigger, the shoulder stock, the envelope, the stamp, the Bushmaster, the 5.56x45's or even the doors to his car.
Both sides of the envelope, the card, the adhesive side of the stamp, and the .22LR bullets were all found to have DNA MATCHING SOMEONE IN THE CONVICTED FELON DNA DATABASE FOR NEW YORK STATE
The DNA Results eliminate both Nancy Lanza and Adam Lanza as the source of DNA found on the driver's side front door handle and driver's side exterior door handle on the suspect vehicles car as well as the gun."
serf
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1012004/pg1
His DNA found was found on the side of the Mark .22 that was used to shoot his mother, and possibly on the barrel end.
His DNA was not found on the bullets, the trigger, the shoulder stock, the envelope, the stamp, the Bushmaster, the 5.56x45's or even the doors to his car.
Both sides of the envelope, the card, the adhesive side of the stamp, and the .22LR bullets were all found to have DNA MATCHING SOMEONE IN THE CONVICTED FELON DNA DATABASE FOR NEW YORK STATE
The DNA Results eliminate both Nancy Lanza and Adam Lanza as the source of DNA found on the driver's side front door handle and driver's side exterior door handle on the suspect vehicles car as well as the gun."
Comments
Then people will see he was too busy cheating on that ugly wife of his to be bothered with drone authorization to save American lives.
I can think of a lot of things to call the First Lady (mostly relating to things about her politics), but if you are calling her ugly, I'd ask you when was the last time you had your eyes checked?
quote:Originally posted by dennisnielsen
Then people will see he was too busy cheating on that ugly wife of his to be bothered with drone authorization to save American lives.
I can think of a lot of things to call the First Lady (mostly relating to things about her politics), but if you are calling her ugly, I'd ask you when was the last time you had your eyes checked?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder....
This is very interesting Data Folks! It cast a shadow over who and what happen that day tragic day!
serf
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1012004/pg1
His DNA found was found on the side of the Mark .22 that was used to shoot his mother, and possibly on the barrel end.
His DNA was not found on the bullets, the trigger, the shoulder stock, the envelope, the stamp, the Bushmaster, the 5.56x45's or even the doors to his car.
Both sides of the envelope, the card, the adhesive side of the stamp, and the .22LR bullets were all found to have DNA MATCHING SOMEONE IN THE CONVICTED FELON DNA DATABASE FOR NEW YORK STATE
The DNA Results eliminate both Nancy Lanza and Adam Lanza as the source of DNA found on the driver's side front door handle and driver's side exterior door handle on the suspect vehicles car as well as the gun."
A lot of misunderstanding about DNA evidence in the article and comments here.
A "hit" in a data base is not a "match." Swabbing surfaces -- looking for trace amounts of DNA -- does not commonly yield useful results.
I will say I do not like the police behavior and handling/disclosure of evidence with the Sandy Hook shooting -- to me, it was clearly politically driven. The police wanted maximum emotional effect for a gun control political agenda.
At the same time, I recognize there was a lot of evidence processed with the Sandy Hook shooting; you have to be cautious with people "playing with" evidence to support their own (usually ridiculous) ideas about "conspiracy."
The basic facts of the case are pretty clear: It was a case of a psycho kid with a stupid mother who enabled the psycho kid to carry out a horrific attack.
After the fact, sicko politicians (including the politically motivated in the police department) decide to try to maximize the event for an attempt at more gun control, but there is no evidence the event itself was somehow "planned."
quote:Originally posted by dennisnielsen
Then people will see he was too busy cheating on that ugly wife of his to be bothered with drone authorization to save American lives.
I can think of a lot of things to call the First Lady (mostly relating to things about her politics), but if you are calling her ugly, I'd ask you when was the last time you had your eyes checked?
Are you saying that you think Michelle is pretty?
quote:Originally posted by competentone
quote:Originally posted by dennisnielsen
Then people will see he was too busy cheating on that ugly wife of his to be bothered with drone authorization to save American lives.
I can think of a lot of things to call the First Lady (mostly relating to things about her politics), but if you are calling her ugly, I'd ask you when was the last time you had your eyes checked?
Are you saying that you think Michelle is pretty?
No, I'm saying she is not (physically) ugly.
quote:Originally posted by serf
This is very interesting Data Folks! It cast a shadow over who and what happen that day tragic day!
serf
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1012004/pg1
His DNA found was found on the side of the Mark .22 that was used to shoot his mother, and possibly on the barrel end.
His DNA was not found on the bullets, the trigger, the shoulder stock, the envelope, the stamp, the Bushmaster, the 5.56x45's or even the doors to his car.
Both sides of the envelope, the card, the adhesive side of the stamp, and the .22LR bullets were all found to have DNA MATCHING SOMEONE IN THE CONVICTED FELON DNA DATABASE FOR NEW YORK STATE
The DNA Results eliminate both Nancy Lanza and Adam Lanza as the source of DNA found on the driver's side front door handle and driver's side exterior door handle on the suspect vehicles car as well as the gun."
A lot of misunderstanding about DNA evidence in the article and comments here.
A "hit" in a data base is not a "match." Swabbing surfaces -- looking for trace amounts of DNA -- does not commonly yield useful results.
I will say I do not like the police behavior and handling/disclosure of evidence with the Sandy Hook shooting -- to me, it was clearly politically driven. The police wanted maximum emotional effect for a gun control political agenda.
At the same time, I recognize there was a lot of evidence processed with the Sandy Hook shooting; you have to be cautious with people "playing with" evidence to support their own (usually ridiculous) ideas about "conspiracy."
The basic facts of the case are pretty clear: It was a case of a psycho kid with a stupid mother who enabled the psycho kid to carry out a horrific attack.
After the fact, sicko politicians (including the politically motivated in the police department) decide to try to maximize the event for an attempt at more gun control, but there is no evidence the event itself was somehow "planned."
A hit is not a match and how is that? A partial match,mixed DNA be specific or you are just using semantics to discount the evidence?
serf
quote:Originally posted by calrugerfan
quote:Originally posted by competentone
quote:Originally posted by dennisnielsen
Then people will see he was too busy cheating on that ugly wife of his to be bothered with drone authorization to save American lives.
I can think of a lot of things to call the First Lady (mostly relating to things about her politics), but if you are calling her ugly, I'd ask you when was the last time you had your eyes checked?
Are you saying that you think Michelle is pretty?
No, I'm saying she is not (physically) ugly.
I think there are many that would sincerely agree disagree with you, myself included.
quote:Originally posted by competentone
quote:Originally posted by serf
This is very interesting Data Folks! It cast a shadow over who and what happen that day tragic day!
serf
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1012004/pg1
His DNA found was found on the side of the Mark .22 that was used to shoot his mother, and possibly on the barrel end.
His DNA was not found on the bullets, the trigger, the shoulder stock, the envelope, the stamp, the Bushmaster, the 5.56x45's or even the doors to his car.
Both sides of the envelope, the card, the adhesive side of the stamp, and the .22LR bullets were all found to have DNA MATCHING SOMEONE IN THE CONVICTED FELON DNA DATABASE FOR NEW YORK STATE
The DNA Results eliminate both Nancy Lanza and Adam Lanza as the source of DNA found on the driver's side front door handle and driver's side exterior door handle on the suspect vehicles car as well as the gun."
A lot of misunderstanding about DNA evidence in the article and comments here.
A "hit" in a data base is not a "match." Swabbing surfaces -- looking for trace amounts of DNA -- does not commonly yield useful results.
I will say I do not like the police behavior and handling/disclosure of evidence with the Sandy Hook shooting -- to me, it was clearly politically driven. The police wanted maximum emotional effect for a gun control political agenda.
At the same time, I recognize there was a lot of evidence processed with the Sandy Hook shooting; you have to be cautious with people "playing with" evidence to support their own (usually ridiculous) ideas about "conspiracy."
The basic facts of the case are pretty clear: It was a case of a psycho kid with a stupid mother who enabled the psycho kid to carry out a horrific attack.
After the fact, sicko politicians (including the politically motivated in the police department) decide to try to maximize the event for an attempt at more gun control, but there is no evidence the event itself was somehow "planned."
A hit is not a match and how is that? A partial match,mixed DNA be specific or you are just using semantics to discount the evidence?
serf
Here, it is a very complex subject (which doesn't lend itself well to a forum like this):
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=understanding+DNA+evidence&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=
quote:Originally posted by competentone
quote:Originally posted by dennisnielsen
Then people will see he was too busy cheating on that ugly wife of his to be bothered with drone authorization to save American lives.
I can think of a lot of things to call the First Lady (mostly relating to things about her politics), but if you are calling her ugly, I'd ask you when was the last time you had your eyes checked?
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder....
FIFY.[:D][;)]
Bigfoot's skull has been found!
http://weeklyworldnews.com/
Who's got time for all that Sandy Hook nonsense?!
Bigfoot's skull has been found!
http://weeklyworldnews.com/
Smoke and mirrors are a blessing here! [:o)]
serf
Serf stop posting in GD.
If it happens again you are banninated.
No, I'm saying she is not (physically) ugly.
I recommend a vision check...
quote:Originally posted by dennisnielsen
Then people will see he was too busy cheating on that ugly wife of his to be bothered with drone authorization to save American lives.
I can think of a lot of things to call the First Lady (mostly relating to things about her politics), but if you are calling her ugly, I'd ask you when was the last time you had your eyes checked?
Yeah, she looks great! She could have been leading lady in " Gorilla's in the mist ".[:D]
quote:Originally posted by competentone
quote:Originally posted by dennisnielsen
Then people will see he was too busy cheating on that ugly wife of his to be bothered with drone authorization to save American lives.
I can think of a lot of things to call the First Lady (mostly relating to things about her politics), but if you are calling her ugly, I'd ask you when was the last time you had your eyes checked?
Yeah, she looks great! She could have been leading lady in " Gorilla's in the mist ".[:D]
[:D][:D][:D][:D]
quote:Originally posted by competentone
quote:Originally posted by dennisnielsen
Then people will see he was too busy cheating on that ugly wife of his to be bothered with drone authorization to save American lives.
I can think of a lot of things to call the First Lady (mostly relating to things about her politics), but if you are calling her ugly, I'd ask you when was the last time you had your eyes checked?
Yeah, she looks great! She could have been leading lady in " Gorilla's in the mist ".[:D]
You folks are just mean.
She is a very handsome woman.
Brad Steele
Really?
Serf stop posting in GD.
If it happens again you are banninated.
Nunn told me my lock was lifted. Can I post in GD?
But, but, but the government would NEVER lie to it's people! [;)]
Or commit a mass school shooting.
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/sandy-hook-redux-obama-officials-confirm-that-it-was-a-drill-and-no-children-died_062014