.

Resistance is Futile: The Violent Cost of

Waco WaltzWaco Waltz Member Posts: 10,821
edited September 2014 in Politics
Resistance is Futile: The Violent Cost of Challenging the American Police State

by John W. WhiteheadRutherford Institute | September 10, 2014




"Police are specialists in violence. They are armed, trained, and authorized to use force. With varying degrees of subtlety, this colors their every action. Like the possibility of arrest, the threat of violence is implicit in every police encounter. Violence, as well as the law, is what they represent."
-Kristian Williams, activist and author

If you don't want to get probed, poked, pinched, tasered, tackled, searched, seized, stripped, manhandled, arrested, shot, or killed, don't say, do or even suggest anything that even hints of noncompliance. This is the new "thin blue line" over which you must not cross in interactions with police if you want to walk away with your life and freedoms intact.

The following incidents and many more like them serve as chilling reminders that in the American police state, "we the people" are at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to "serve and protect."


For example, police arrested Chaumtoli Huq because she failed to promptly comply when ordered to "move along" while waiting outside a Ruby Tuesday's restaurant for her children, who were inside with their father, using the bathroom. NYPD officers grabbed Huq, a lawyer with the New York City Public Advocate's office, flipped her around, pressed her against a wall, handcuffed her, searched her purse, arrested her, and told her to "shut up" when she cried out for help, before detaining her for nine hours. Huq was charged with obstructing governmental administration, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct.

Oregon resident Fred Marlow was jailed and charged with interfering and resisting arrest after he filmed a SWAT team raid that took place across the street from his apartment and uploaded the footage to the internet. The footage shows police officers threatening Marlow, who was awoken by the sounds of "multiple bombs blasting and glass breaking" and ran outside to investigate only to be threatened with arrest if he didn't follow orders and return inside.

Eric Garner, 43 years old, asthmatic and unarmed, died after being put in a chokehold by NYPD police, allegedly for resisting arrest over his selling untaxed, loose cigarettes, although video footage of the incident shows little resistance on Garner's part. Indeed, the man was screaming, begging and insisting he couldn't breathe. And what was New York Mayor Bill De Blasio's advice to citizens in order to avoid a similar fate? Don't resist arrest. (Mind you, the NYPD arrests more than 13,000 people every year on charges of resisting arrest, although only a small fraction of those charged ever get prosecuted.)

Then there was Marine Brandon Raub, who was questioned at his home by a swarm of DHS, FBI, Secret Service agents and local police, tackled to the ground, handcuffed, and forcibly transported to a police station. Raub was then detained against his will in a psychiatric ward, without being provided any explanation, having any charges levied against him or being read his rights-all allegedly because of controversial song lyrics and political views posted on his Facebook page.

Incredibly, police insisted that Raub was not in fact under arrest. Of course, Raub was under arrest. When your hands are handcuffed behind you, when armed policemen are tackling you to the ground and transporting you across town in the back of a police car, and then forcibly detaining you against your will, you're not free to walk away.

If you do attempt to walk away, be warned that the consequences will likely be even worse, as Tremaine McMillian learned the hard way. Miami-Dade police slammed the 14-year-old boy to the ground, putting him in a chokehold and handcuffing him after he allegedly gave them "dehumanizing stares" and walked away from them, which the officers found unacceptable. According to Miami-Dade Police Detective Alvaro Zabaleta, "His body language was that he was stiffening up and pulling away. When you have somebody resistant to them and pulling away and somebody clenching their fists and flailing their arms, that's a threat. Of course we have to neutralize the threat."

As I point out in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, this mindset that any challenge to police authority is a threat that needs to be "neutralized" is a dangerous one that is part of a greater nationwide trend that sets the police beyond the reach of the Fourth Amendment. Moreover, when police officers are allowed to operate under the assumption that their word is law and that there is no room for any form of disagreement or even question, that serves to chill the First Amendment's assurances of free speech, free assembly and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Frankly, it doesn't matter whether it's a casual "show your ID" request on a boardwalk, a stop-and-frisk search on a city street, or a traffic stop for speeding or just to check your insurance: if you feel like you can't walk away from a police encounter of your own volition-and more often than not you can't, especially when you're being confronted by someone armed to the hilt with all manner of militarized weaponry and gear-then for all intents and purposes, you're under arrest from the moment a cop stops you.

That raises the question, what exactly constitutes resisting an arrest? What about those other trumped up "contempt of cop" charges such as interference, disorderly conduct, obstruction, and failure to obey a police order that get trotted out anytime a citizen engages in behavior the police perceive as disrespectful or "insufficiently deferential to their authority"? Do Americans really have any recourse at all when it comes to obeying an order from a police officer, even if it's just to ask a question or assert one's rights, or should we just "surrender quietly"?

The short answer is that anything short of compliance will get you arrested and jailed. The long answer is a little more complicated, convoluted and full of legal jargon and dissonance among the courts, but the conclusion is still the same: anything short of compliance is being perceived as "threatening" behavior or resistance to be met by police with extreme force resulting in injury, arrest or death for the resistor.

The key word, of course, is comply meaning to obey, submit or conform. This is what author Kristian Williams describes as the dual myths of heroism and danger: "The overblown image of police heroism, and the `obsession' with officer safety, do not only serve to justify police violence after the fact; by providing such justification, they legitimize violence, and thus make it more likely."

How else can we explain why police shot a schizophrenic 30-year-old man holding a pellet gun over 80 times before his corpse was handcuffed? Mind you, witnesses reportedly informed the police that it was not a real gun, but the officers nonetheless opened fire about five minutes after arriving on the scene.

John Crawford was shot by police in an Ohio Wal-Mart for holding an air rifle sold in the store that he may have intended to buy. Oscar Grant, age 23, unarmed and lying face-down on the ground, was shot in the back by a transit officer in Oakland, Calif., who mistakenly used a gun instead of a taser to further restrain him. Ordered to show his hands after "anti-crime" police officers noticed him adjusting "his waistband in a manner the officers deemed suspicious," 16-year old Kimani Grey was fired at 11 times, and shot seven times, including three times in the back. Reportedly, the teenager was unarmed and unthreatening.

Even dogs aren't spared if they are perceived as "threatening." Family dogs are routinely shot and killed during SWAT team raids, even if the SWAT team is at the wrong address or the dog is in the next yard over. One six-year-old girl witnessed her dog Apollo shot dead by an Illinois police officer.

Clearly, when police officers cease to look and act like civil servants or peace officers but instead look and act like soldiers occupying a hostile territory, it alters their perception of "we the people." Those who founded this country believed that we were the masters and that those whose salaries we pay with our hard-earned tax dollars are our servants.

If daring to question, challenge or even hesitate when a cop issues an order can get you charged with resisting arrest or disorderly conduct, you're not the master in a master-servant relationship. In fact, you're not even the servant-you're the slave.

This is not freedom. This is not even a life.

This is a battlefield, a war zone-if you will-governed by martial law and disguised as a democracy. No matter how many ways you fancy it up with shopping malls, populist elections, and Monday night football, the fact remains that "we the people" are little more than prisoners in the American police state, and the police are our jailers and wardens.



http://www.infowars.com/resistance-i...-police-state/

Comments

  • slumlord44slumlord44 Member Posts: 3,693 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Maybe I am missing something but why would any sane person who is not suicidal NOT be polite and well mannered to someone who carries a loaded gun and you know can legally kill you if he feels his life is threatened? That being said I will be the first to admit that there are some cops out there who are not playing with a full deck. Went into my small town police station once to file a routine report that some idiot kicked in the door on the garage at one of my rentals. Cop on duty gave me a rash of crap and was about to physically throw me out of the police station before I managed to defuse the situation. No one else in the building at the time. The city ended up making the idiot the chief for several years. Got into him when he was chief down at the local parts store and got a discussion about how you could legally carry an unloaded handgun in a car in Illinois. He did not have a clue and was dead wrong on the issue. I pulled a $100 bill out of my wallet and asked him if he was willing to put his money where his mouth was. That ended the conversation.
  • Waco WaltzWaco Waltz Member Posts: 10,821
    edited November -1
    ANYONE can find themselves contacted by police and after the contact is made you just cannot predict how good or bad things might go.
  • serfserf Member Posts: 7,306 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It just not the law enforcement people on the streets! It's what tools they have now to pry into everything you do to protect you from evil terrorist at every corner. The fourth amendment has become defacto and void in THE NWO!

    Our Republic is controlled and bought by big money and world corporations. Your vote means nothing anymore.

    serf

    DHS Use Police Depts to Gather Intel on Citizens & Label Them Extremist Threats

    http://www.occupycorporatism.com/home/dhs-use-police-depts-to-gather-intel-on-citizens-label-them-extremist-threats/



    Training of local police department officers to paramilitarize and integrate them into military tactical operations is the key to combating localized extremism.
    Over the last few years the DHS have been indoctrinating local police departments into "non-Federal law enforcement agencies" as outlined in the DHS directive from the Office for State and Local Law Enforcement (SLLE).


    DHS is successful in their relationship with local police departments all across the nation because they are contracted private security firms (or hired armed guards) that are placed in a city or town to secure the population and generate revenue for the local government.

    In early 2012, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released a report entitled "Homeland Security and Intelligence: Next Steps in Evolving the Mission" which outlined in part on how to redirect efforts of the federal government from international terrorism toward home-grown terrorists and build a DHS-controlled police force agency that would control all cities and towns through the use of local police departments.
  • spasmcreekspasmcreek Member Posts: 38,925
    edited November -1
    correction on one sentence......"is the key to combating localized political dissent"
  • DaveJDaveJ Member Posts: 395 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    In early 2012, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released a report entitled "Homeland Security and Intelligence: Next Steps in Evolving the Mission" which outlined in part on how to redirect efforts of the federal government from international terrorism toward home-grown terrorists and build a DHS-controlled police force agency that would control all cities and towns through the use of local police departments.
    [/quote]

    The SS comes to mind. The Enabling Act/Patriot Act and Homeland security/SS are the products of those who want to strip us of our freedoms.
Sign In or Register to comment.