In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
"Putin's C@#k Holster"
interstatepawnllc
Member Posts: 9,390
So most have heard Steve Colbert's unhinged rant on television the other night. Too many double standards here to list but I would like to make this one ironic observation.
The gist of Colbert's rant is twofold, he was saying that (a) It's a bad thing that Trump's in bed with Putin and (b) that it is bad to have another man's unit in your mouth.
So where are the light loafered libtards on this one? Where is the LGBT outcry? How is Mr. Colbert NOT swinging from a Starbucks rafter?
This is because either on a conscious or subconscious level slights like this can be overlooked because the person being attacked is (a) non socialist, (b) straight or (c) white.
Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
The gist of Colbert's rant is twofold, he was saying that (a) It's a bad thing that Trump's in bed with Putin and (b) that it is bad to have another man's unit in your mouth.
So where are the light loafered libtards on this one? Where is the LGBT outcry? How is Mr. Colbert NOT swinging from a Starbucks rafter?
This is because either on a conscious or subconscious level slights like this can be overlooked because the person being attacked is (a) non socialist, (b) straight or (c) white.
Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
Comments
So most have heard Steve Colbert's unhinged rant on television the other night. Too many double standards here to list but I would like to make this one ironic observation.
The gist of Colbert's rant is twofold, he was saying that (a) It's a bad thing that Trump's in bed with Putin and (b) that it is bad to have another man's unit in your mouth.
So where are the light loafered libtards on this one? Where is the LGBT outcry? How is Mr. Colbert NOT swinging from a Starbucks rafter?
This is because either on a conscious or subconscious level slights like this can be overlooked because the person being attacked is (a) non socialist, (b) straight or (c) white.
Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
There was a great deal of outcry.
http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/tv/stephen-colbert-defends-donald-trump-jokes-after-controversy-erupted-n754716
What news sources did you use?
http://nationalenquirer.com/2017/04/24/50-juveniles-swarm-public-train-rob-people-on-board/
This one is being ignored too. Area surrounded by ghettos -Go figure.
https://patch.com/new-jersey/westorange/cops-disperse-hundreds-after-late-night-brouhaha-essex-county-0
They are EXTREMELY angry because the DNC has brainwashed the idiots forever. Hey when ya can't think for yourself- be led.
obozo emboldened the low life POS. Blame whites-cops ANYTHING but face the truth---FAILED CULTURE OF VIOLENCE. Give 'em their own country? Just look at Jamaica- http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/lead-stories/20160125/murders-jamaica-higher-hottest-war-zone.
Is the violence and anti social behavior genetic???
Lying sacks of $#!& -obozo -rahm- jessie-al and all the other POS say and do nothing about mass murder of their OWN by their OWN.
Is stupidity-arrogance and self destruction genetic?
quote:Originally posted by interstatepawnllc
So most have heard Steve Colbert's unhinged rant on television the other night. Too many double standards here to list but I would like to make this one ironic observation.
The gist of Colbert's rant is twofold, he was saying that (a) It's a bad thing that Trump's in bed with Putin and (b) that it is bad to have another man's unit in your mouth.
So where are the light loafered libtards on this one? Where is the LGBT outcry? How is Mr. Colbert NOT swinging from a Starbucks rafter?
This is because either on a conscious or subconscious level slights like this can be overlooked because the person being attacked is (a) non socialist, (b) straight or (c) white.
Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
There was a great deal of outcry.
http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/tv/stephen-colbert-defends-donald-trump-jokes-after-controversy-erupted-n754716
What news sources did you use?
So does Colbert still have a show? I suggest you reread the post and search for the irony. Idiot!
Imagine for a minute if a Fox commentator made such a comment about a Klinton or an Obama.
Double standard as always. As usual the media missed 100 of these last week:
http://nationalenquirer.com/2017/04/24/50-juveniles-swarm-public-train-rob-people-on-board/
This one is being ignored too. Area surrounded by ghettos -Go figure.
https://patch.com/new-jersey/westorange/cops-disperse-hundreds-after-late-night-brouhaha-essex-county-0
They are EXTREMELY angry because the DNC has brainwashed the idiots forever. Hey when ya can't think for yourself- be led.
obozo emboldened the low life POS. Blame whites-cops ANYTHING but face the truth---FAILED CULTURE OF VIOLENCE. Give 'em their own country? Just look at Jamaica- http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/lead-stories/20160125/murders-jamaica-higher-hottest-war-zone.
Is the violence and anti social behavior genetic???
Lying sacks of $#!& -obozo -rahm- jessie-al and all the other POS say and do nothing about mass murder of their OWN by their OWN.
Is stupidity-arrogance and self destruction genetic?
I really wonder sometimes.
FWIW, it is not irony if you create both the premise and the result.
Brad Steele
It used to be in fun now it is down right hateful.
These libtards need a dose of reality, like a kick in the nutz or just an old fashion * whipping.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Before all this, I had no idea the dude was even on TV still.
I have never even watched 1 second of his show and I don't plan too either. SNL lost me in the 90's.
This used to be comedy but now its really just hateful mocking and bullying. The libtards are always criticizing the bully but that is exactly what they are doing.
bleen these pinkos
He not French and he's damn pretentious with his name pronunciation. He's nothing more than a Letterman knockoff.
quote:Originally posted by bigoutside
quote:Originally posted by interstatepawnllc
So most have heard Steve Colbert's unhinged rant on television the other night. Too many double standards here to list but I would like to make this one ironic observation.
The gist of Colbert's rant is twofold, he was saying that (a) It's a bad thing that Trump's in bed with Putin and (b) that it is bad to have another man's unit in your mouth.
So where are the light loafered libtards on this one? Where is the LGBT outcry? How is Mr. Colbert NOT swinging from a Starbucks rafter?
This is because either on a conscious or subconscious level slights like this can be overlooked because the person being attacked is (a) non socialist, (b) straight or (c) white.
Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
There was a great deal of outcry.
http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/tv/stephen-colbert-defends-donald-trump-jokes-after-controversy-erupted-n754716
What news sources did you use?
So does Colbert still have a show? I suggest you reread the post and search for the irony. Idiot!
Just to be clear... you're calling me an idiot?
The irony I saw was your claim that no one was upset. So I linked to an article that referenced that people in the LGBT community are upset. And the conservative community is also upset.
Help me through this. Cause I've been known to get my panties bunched. [;)]
He still has a show.
Rachel Maddow owns FOX in her time slot.
Obama is no longer president.
More people identify with his politics than your's or mine.
Yep I would say he called you and idiot. I am not sure why but it looks like he did[;)]
quote:Just to be clear... you're calling me an idiot?
Yep I would say he called you and idiot. I am not sure why but it looks like he did[;)]
Well consider my panties BUNCHED!
And my feelers is hurt!
I am considering getting Don to kick someone's *!!
[;)]
It is patently obvious that trump is a bullshi--er who has a chubby for tyrants and tyranny.
trump mistakes rudeness and cruelty for strength, as you would expect a cowering little man to do.
I think that trumps' success is that he is the weak man's idea of what a strong man would be, and he sells that shi- to people who don't know any better. He also lucked out, in that the democrats ran a terrible candidate, and there were people who voted for him while clearly holding their nose, because they didn't want the alternative.
Did you actually see his interview with Face the Nation, that led up to the smackdown?
If you didn't see it, the interviewer asks Trump, while they are in the Oval office, "Do you still believe that Obama had you wiretapped?"
Trump says "I have my own opinions".
The interviewer says "But you're the president, and I'm interested in your opinions."
Trump then says "This interview is over" and walks over to the desk, that has maybe 10 sheets of paper on it. He sits down and pretends to read them, shuffles them a bit, and "fumfers" around with them, being ever so busy with these obviously important documents. It is staggeringly pathetic.
As far as I'm concerned, the president doesn't get to insult people because he's the president. The best part of it is that one of the questions before trump pulled this pathetic little move was that the interviewer said something about a former president (Bush 1? I can't remember...) was that "the scary thing about the oval office is that there are no corners to hide in", to which trump replied "well, it is an oval, that's right..."
Outrage is cheap currency. The people who are "offended" at the idea of trump fellating putin are missing that it is a dominance thing, as opposed to a "happy" thing.
quote:Originally posted by interstatepawnllc
quote:Originally posted by bigoutside
quote:Originally posted by interstatepawnllc
So most have heard Steve Colbert's unhinged rant on television the other night. Too many double standards here to list but I would like to make this one ironic observation.
The gist of Colbert's rant is twofold, he was saying that (a) It's a bad thing that Trump's in bed with Putin and (b) that it is bad to have another man's unit in your mouth.
So where are the light loafered libtards on this one? Where is the LGBT outcry? How is Mr. Colbert NOT swinging from a Starbucks rafter?
This is because either on a conscious or subconscious level slights like this can be overlooked because the person being attacked is (a) non socialist, (b) straight or (c) white.
Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
There was a great deal of outcry.
http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/tv/stephen-colbert-defends-donald-trump-jokes-after-controversy-erupted-n754716
What news sources did you use?
So does Colbert still have a show? I suggest you reread the post and search for the irony. Idiot!
Just to be clear... you're calling me an idiot?
The irony I saw was your claim that no one was upset. So I linked to an article that referenced that people in the LGBT community are upset. And the conservative community is also upset.
Help me through this. Cause I've been known to get my panties bunched. [;)]
He still has a show.
Rachel Maddow owns FOX in her time slot.
Obama is no longer president.
More people identify with his politics than your's or mine.
Might want to check what he said. All the outcry is from the right, that I can see.[:I]
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
quote:Originally posted by bigoutside
quote:Originally posted by interstatepawnllc
quote:Originally posted by bigoutside
quote:Originally posted by interstatepawnllc
So most have heard Steve Colbert's unhinged rant on television the other night. Too many double standards here to list but I would like to make this one ironic observation.
The gist of Colbert's rant is twofold, he was saying that (a) It's a bad thing that Trump's in bed with Putin and (b) that it is bad to have another man's unit in your mouth.
So where are the light loafered libtards on this one? Where is the LGBT outcry? How is Mr. Colbert NOT swinging from a Starbucks rafter?
This is because either on a conscious or subconscious level slights like this can be overlooked because the person being attacked is (a) non socialist, (b) straight or (c) white.
Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
There was a great deal of outcry.
http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/tv/stephen-colbert-defends-donald-trump-jokes-after-controversy-erupted-n754716
What news sources did you use?
So does Colbert still have a show? I suggest you reread the post and search for the irony. Idiot!
Just to be clear... you're calling me an idiot?
The irony I saw was your claim that no one was upset. So I linked to an article that referenced that people in the LGBT community are upset. And the conservative community is also upset.
Help me through this. Cause I've been known to get my panties bunched. [;)]
He still has a show.
Rachel Maddow owns FOX in her time slot.
Obama is no longer president.
More people identify with his politics than your's or mine.
Might want to check what he said. All the outcry is from the right, that I can see.[:I]
From the article:
The comments, which some interpreted as samephobic, birthed #FireColbert as a Twitter trend and a call from conservative viewers and Trump supporters to boycott Colbert's advertisers. The hashtag has been tweeted approximately 350,000 times since Tuesday
AND
the LGBT team were up in arms.
Spend more time on Tranny websites. You'll see for yourself!
[:D]
Who/what is the waspy man?
What writing is on the wall?
have no idea who he/she is
As far as I'm concerned, Colbert's rant was the x ring.
It is patently obvious that trump is a bullshi--er who has a chubby for tyrants and tyranny.
trump mistakes rudeness and cruelty for strength, as you would expect a cowering little man to do.
I think that trumps' success is that he is the weak man's idea of what a strong man would be, and he sells that shi- to people who don't know any better. He also lucked out, in that the democrats ran a terrible candidate, and there were people who voted for him while clearly holding their nose, because they didn't want the alternative.
Did you actually see his interview with Face the Nation, that led up to the smackdown?
If you didn't see it, the interviewer asks Trump, while they are in the Oval office, "Do you still believe that Obama had you wiretapped?"
Trump says "I have my own opinions".
The interviewer says "But you're the president, and I'm interested in your opinions."
Trump then says "This interview is over" and walks over to the desk, that has maybe 10 sheets of paper on it. He sits down and pretends to read them, shuffles them a bit, and "fumfers" around with them, being ever so busy with these obviously important documents. It is staggeringly pathetic.
As far as I'm concerned, the president doesn't get to insult people because he's the president. The best part of it is that one of the questions before trump pulled this pathetic little move was that the interviewer said something about a former president (Bush 1? I can't remember...) was that "the scary thing about the oval office is that there are no corners to hide in", to which trump replied "well, it is an oval, that's right..."
Outrage is cheap currency. The people who are "offended" at the idea of trump fellating putin are missing that it is a dominance thing, as opposed to a "happy" thing.
Always a treat to see the moral bankruptcy and intellectual vacancy of the left clearly displayed.
Always a disappointment to see the moral bankruptcy and feebleness of those who support trump and resort to ad hominem attacks when faced with reality...
quote:Originally posted by Jgreen
As far as I'm concerned, Colbert's rant was the x ring.
It is patently obvious that trump is a bullshi--er who has a chubby for tyrants and tyranny.
trump mistakes rudeness and cruelty for strength, as you would expect a cowering little man to do.
I think that trumps' success is that he is the weak man's idea of what a strong man would be, and he sells that shi- to people who don't know any better. He also lucked out, in that the democrats ran a terrible candidate, and there were people who voted for him while clearly holding their nose, because they didn't want the alternative.
Did you actually see his interview with Face the Nation, that led up to the smackdown?
If you didn't see it, the interviewer asks Trump, while they are in the Oval office, "Do you still believe that Obama had you wiretapped?"
Trump says "I have my own opinions".
The interviewer says "But you're the president, and I'm interested in your opinions."
Trump then says "This interview is over" and walks over to the desk, that has maybe 10 sheets of paper on it. He sits down and pretends to read them, shuffles them a bit, and "fumfers" around with them, being ever so busy with these obviously important documents. It is staggeringly pathetic.
As far as I'm concerned, the president doesn't get to insult people because he's the president. The best part of it is that one of the questions before trump pulled this pathetic little move was that the interviewer said something about a former president (Bush 1? I can't remember...) was that "the scary thing about the oval office is that there are no corners to hide in", to which trump replied "well, it is an oval, that's right..."
Outrage is cheap currency. The people who are "offended" at the idea of trump fellating putin are missing that it is a dominance thing, as opposed to a "happy" thing.
Always a treat to see the moral bankruptcy and intellectual vacancy of the left clearly displayed.
[^]
Do I win?
Always a disappointment to see the moral bankruptcy and feebleness of those who support trump and resort to ad hominem attacks when faced with reality...
You express a high level of support for a crass and obscene comment about the president...but are upset about ad hominem. That is just silly enough to almost be cute.
You might want to check into that old saying about opening one's mouth and removing all doubt.
What's silly is that you don't know what an ad hominem attack is. It's not just a personal insult. It is a personal insult in lieu of a response to an argument.
Seems to me that you haven't been following this discussion. Here's the Cliff's notes version:
1. President insults a reporter in a craven and cowardly manner.
2. Colbert, a comedian, roasts him over his conduct, including a "fact based" insult, which is funny because Trump has a fetish for dictators, and the act of which he has been deemed suitable for is one that is commonly associated with subservience.
3. People claim to be bent out of shape over Colbert's remarks.
4. I explain why the remarks are well-deserved.
5. Rather than take issue with what I said, a personal insult is made. That, folks, is an ad hominem argument.
I say he kicks everyone's *; group attitude adjustment.
"You express a high level of support for a crass and obscene comment about the president...but are upset about ad hominem. That is just silly enough to almost be cute."
What's silly is that you don't know what an ad hominem attack is. It's not just a personal insult. It is a personal insult in lieu of a response to an argument.
Seems to me that you haven't been following this discussion. Here's the Cliff's notes version:
1. President insults a reporter in a craven and cowardly manner.
2. Colbert, a comedian, roasts him over his conduct, including a "fact based" insult, which is funny because Trump has a fetish for dictators, and the act of which he has been deemed suitable for is one that is commonly associated with subservience.
3. People claim to be bent out of shape over Colbert's remarks.
4. I explain why the remarks are well-deserved.
5. Rather than take issue with what I said, a personal insult is made. That, folks, is an ad hominem argument.
You seem unable to grasp the idea that because you say something, doesn't make it true. Claiming something is "reality", or stating that you have "explained why the remarks are well-deserved" has little relation to accuracy.
You made a silly little rant typical of a leftist with it's panties still bunched over an election loss. It isn't exactly what one considers an intellectual tour de force. I am sure you can look up what that means.
Quote: Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
Who/what is the waspy man?
What writing is on the wall?
Waspy as in white Anglo Saxon Protestant. The writing on the wall means it's open season on old white guys.
I went to high school with that *. Had more than enough of his bs then.
Trump or Colbert?
quote:Originally posted by droptop
Quote: Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
Who/what is the waspy man?
What writing is on the wall?
Waspy as in white Anglo Saxon Protestant. The writing on the wall means it's open season on old white guys.
Who are you taking about and what writing is on the wall?
Always a disappointment to see the moral bankruptcy and feebleness of those who support trump and resort to ad hominem attacks when faced with reality...
you being politically naive and historically ignorant makes your comments the equivalent of a blind man yelling about bright lights.
As far as I'm concerned, Colbert's rant was the x ring.
It is patently obvious that trump is a bullshi--er who has a chubby for tyrants and tyranny.
trump mistakes rudeness and cruelty for strength, as you would expect a cowering little man to do.
I think that trumps' success is that he is the weak man's idea of what a strong man would be, and he sells that shi- to people who don't know any better. He also lucked out, in that the democrats ran a terrible candidate, and there were people who voted for him while clearly holding their nose, because they didn't want the alternative.
Did you actually see his interview with Face the Nation, that led up to the smackdown?
If you didn't see it, the interviewer asks Trump, while they are in the Oval office, "Do you still believe that Obama had you wiretapped?"
Trump says "I have my own opinions".
The interviewer says "But you're the president, and I'm interested in your opinions."
Trump then says "This interview is over" and walks over to the desk, that has maybe 10 sheets of paper on it. He sits down and pretends to read them, shuffles them a bit, and "fumfers" around with them, being ever so busy with these obviously important documents. It is staggeringly pathetic.
As far as I'm concerned, the president doesn't get to insult people because he's the president. The best part of it is that one of the questions before trump pulled this pathetic little move was that the interviewer said something about a former president (Bush 1? I can't remember...) was that "the scary thing about the oval office is that there are no corners to hide in", to which trump replied "well, it is an oval, that's right..."
Outrage is cheap currency. The people who are "offended" at the idea of trump fellating putin are missing that it is a dominance thing, as opposed to a "happy" thing.
politically naive and historically ignorant is no way to go through life.