In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Trump is losing it
He is frothing at the mouth at everything and anything he sees. He needs a vacation and for somebody to bust his tweeter thing. Trump could be very effective if he would just cool his jets. If he does not he will destroy himself. The office is too big to carry on like a bull in a China shop for 18 hours a day.
Comments
What evidence do you have that is not generated by the fake new organizations?
I see that he is doing a really effective job, given the resistance he is against.
Margaret Thatcher
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
Mark Twain
Really?
What evidence do you have that is not generated by the fake new organizations?
I see that he is doing a really effective job, given the resistance he is against.
His reactions are not healthy for him or the nation.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/09/05/ny-times-publishes-bombshell-anonymous-resistance-op-ed-trump-responds-furiously
We have passed a tax bill
Increased employment to record levels
Stiffened our foreign relations spine
Etc. Etc. Etc.
While they are busy worrying about who Trump slept with or paid off to keep quiet about it, and which of his minions they can prosecute for infractions that are so minimum Hillary and Obama's criminals have to be laughing about them.
Remember Holder provided guns to Mexican criminals that were used to kill a Fed.
Hillary destroyed subpoenaed Emails and Obama's tainted Justice department used bogus info to snoop on Trump and uncover evidence that they would never have gotten using legal means.
New York Times does not fall into the realm of real news.
Margaret Thatcher
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
Mark Twain
And I asked for non fake news.
New York Times does not fall into the realm of real news.
Especially when they publish "anonymous" might as well be completely manufactured OP/Eds...OP/EDs are such because those that opine put their name to it. Dishonest reporters, reporting things said off the record etc...smells of propaganda to elicit a response from the White House.
But I did enjoy the article I read over the weekend indicating the Red Hen resteraunt was a bit down on its luck after the Sara Sanders incident.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/virginia-town-still-suffering-after-red-hen-kicked-sarah-huckabee-sanders-out/amp/
quote:Originally posted by Alpine
Really?
What evidence do you have that is not generated by the fake new organizations?
I see that he is doing a really effective job, given the resistance he is against.
His reactions are not healthy for him or the nation.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/09/05/ny-times-publishes-bombshell-anonymous-resistance-op-ed-trump-responds-furiously
I totally disagree. His reactions are spot on and help the normal folks understand it is OK to be upset with the crap fed us.
a man's trust is a terrible thing to waste, he wouldn't trust anything they say. they not only wasted it my trust but crapped on it...
it may be his venting by tweeting is keeping him from a stroke, sometimes it is better to let it out, and you do have to wonder is he really pissed or just acting that way to mess with them??????? I agreee it is not presidential but nobody in politics is acting very professional nowdays...
I wish we had a thumbs up icon, I'd give you one....a wink and nod will have to do for now [;)].....................[:)]
"Never do wrong to make a friend----or to keep one".....Robert E. Lee
And I asked for non fake news.
New York Times does not fall into the realm of real news.
The story (editorial) may or may not be from a Senior Member that is true. Trumps reaction to these stories is the issue, not the story, not the tone or subject matter of the story. It is President Trump's lashing attacks over every possible slight he sees.
What the media is doing is easy to understand. It is like a woman that knows what your push buttons are. She will use them as a weapon against you, if you let her. The more you react, the more you lose. Those buttons only have value if you react the way she expects.
The media is no different. They got Trump by the tail and are pulling as hard as they can. Trump reacts just like they know he will, he is predictable by now. He lashes out and sounds like a * over 1/2 the time the other times they help him look like a fool. He needs to stop reacting tot he bait. Soon the media will learn that pulling his tail does not get the reaction from him they are paying for and look elsewhere for their sensational headlines.
New York Times? I'm not even going to bother reading it. If they told me if men had ballpark Franks, I would think that females have Ball Park Franks...
a man's trust is a terrible thing to waste, he wouldn't trust anything they say. they not only wasted it my trust but crapped on it...
You don't get it either. Eff the NY Times, I agree wholeheartedly. It is Trumps reaction to this stuff that is the issue. The story is from THE BLAZE and is showing Trumps reaction to an editorial.
I don't want "presidential", that is how we got into this mess in the first place. He's a president for the people and he has a right to tout his accomplishments, and if the only airtime he can get is this way, so be it.
The media won't cover his accomplishments, so they are playing right into Trumps taunting them.
He wasn't steaming, stuttering or anything but gaining even more support for himself and hatred towards that media outlet who printed derogatory commentary anonymously.
Really?
What evidence do you have that is not generated by the fake new organizations?
I see that he is doing a really effective job, given the resistance he is against.
Agree 100%
The lying filthy partisan media is in a full out war to destroy Trump.
These people are hate filled DEMOCRATs and can never be trusted.
This is the same media that was bought into both the Omarosa and Wolfe books as gospel and later proved to be fiction. Now along comes the Woodward book and the media are once again frothing at the mouth thinking they found another silver bullet. BTW, Woodwards book is being discredited but you have to go to Breitbart or Drudge to read about it.
Get real news straight from the whitehouse.gov and see the positives for a change.
I honestly don?t know how PRESIDENT TRUMP gets as much GOOD WORK for the country done as he does with all the manufactured propaganda and distractions.
But I did enjoy the article I read over the weekend indicating the Red Hen resteraunt was a bit down on its luck after the Sara Sanders incident.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/virginia-town-still-suffering-after-red-hen-kicked-sarah-huckabee-sanders-out/amp/
Plus that!!![:D]
You don't get it. He has them on the ropes and is pounding them till they drop. I hope he keeps it up until they submit.
I don't want "presidential", that is how we got into this mess in the first place. He's a president for the people and he has a right to tout his accomplishments, and if the only airtime he can get is this way, so be it.
The media won't cover his accomplishments, so they are playing right into Trumps taunting them.
He wasn't steaming, stuttering or anything but gaining even more support for himself and hatred towards that media outlet who printed derogatory commentary anonymously.
I am glad you feel that way however middle of the road people don't like it and I sure as hell don't either. In life you need to learn an important lesson. When itching for a fight do you want to win, or do you want to blow steam because very seldom will blowing steam gain you a win and if it does will the win be worth the price paid for it?
He needs to focus on doing the nations business and stop tilting at windmills.
Mr. Hume:
I've just read your lousy review of Margaret's concert. I've come to the conclusion that you are an "eight ulcer man on four ulcer pay."
It seems to me that you are a frustrated old man who wishes he could have been successful. When you write such poppy-cock as was in the back section of the paper you work for it shows conclusively that you're off the beam and at least four of your ulcers are at work.
Some day I hope to meet you. When that happens you'll need a new nose, a lot of beefsteak for black eyes, and perhaps a supporter below!
Pegler, a gutter snipe, is a gentleman alongside you. I hope you'll accept that statement as a worse insult than a reflection on your ancestry.
BTW, THAT one was signed Harry Truman.
I support President Trump.
quote:Originally posted by remingtonoaks
New York Times? I'm not even going to bother reading it. If they told me if men had ballpark Franks, I would think that females have Ball Park Franks...
a man's trust is a terrible thing to waste, he wouldn't trust anything they say. they not only wasted it my trust but crapped on it...
You don't get it either. Eff the NY Times, I agree wholeheartedly. It is Trumps reaction to this stuff that is the issue. The story is from THE BLAZE and is showing Trumps reaction to an editorial.
No, you don't get it. If he said nothing they would complain about it, if he said he'd like the article they would complain about it, if he complained about the article they would complain about it....
Like I say, it's not even worth my time to read it...
If he indeed went off on the Press, bully for him.... They deserve to have him go off on them....
I'm truly sick and tired of hearing people like you downgrade him because he sticks up for himself against those bullies... They're lucky he doesn't come knock your teeth down their throat... 30 years ago it would have been justifiable in a court of law to knock their teeth down their throats. before snowflakes like you ruined it for the real men
quote:Originally posted by mag00
You don't get it. He has them on the ropes and is pounding them till they drop. I hope he keeps it up until they submit.
I don't want "presidential", that is how we got into this mess in the first place. He's a president for the people and he has a right to tout his accomplishments, and if the only airtime he can get is this way, so be it.
The media won't cover his accomplishments, so they are playing right into Trumps taunting them.
He wasn't steaming, stuttering or anything but gaining even more support for himself and hatred towards that media outlet who printed derogatory commentary anonymously.
I am glad you feel that way however middle of the road people don't like it and I sure as hell don't either. In life you need to learn an important lesson. When itching for a fight do you want to win, or do you want to blow steam because very seldom will blowing steam gain you a win and if it does will the win be worth the price paid for it?
He needs to focus on doing the nations business and stop tilting at windmills.
You make it sound like he is deranged and flailing like many of the snowflake vids when he won.
I fully expected to see some rant by the way your presented this, then I watched the video and it all made sense.
The media outlet endorsed or propagated the opinion piece. He needed to correct the infraction in the moment. He did, and was quite composed as he did, he actually seem to almost do some grandstanding, hardly a meltdown or losing it.
I think his success might be getting to his head, based on his 2020 statement. I fully believe Oprah could win if she ran. Hell, I might even vote for her.
I contemplated this a bit and the fact that she promoted and endorsed a "fictional" book I like (Pillars of the Earth), lends me to believe that her head is in the right spot on how the world works. She is a billionaire too, so she earned her spot.
If you think Trump is frothing at the mouth and tilting at windmills...watch out for Chutes.
I did not vote for Trump, I am a Ted Cruz sort of guy.
I tell US folks who would disparage my President that he is doing better than I had expected. I also let them know how much better he is doing than Clinton could have ever hoped.
I am not a fan at all when Trump resorts to childish antics; something he does way too often. In this case, however, he is understandably angry and I have no issue with him showing emotion. The video I've seen of him regarding this seems remarkably measured, IMO, considering he has just been stabbed in the back by someone he presumably trusted.
Obviously we don't know if what was written in the Op-Ed is true, or how tainted it is based upon the perspective of the writer. The NYT Times, however, knows who the author is, and regardless of their political slant, I doubt they would present the author as a highly placed administration official were that not the case.
Brad Steele
These are real aliens, ie: probably the anonymous sources that wrote the Trump article in the Blaze.
I see many Fanatics here, that's cool but until Trump cools his jets over every perceived slight and stops reacting to the 93% negative press he gets it will only get worse for him and his effectiveness for you and me will diminish.
I did not vote for Trump, I am a Ted Cruz sort of guy.
You don't seem to understand that his effectiveness is because of how he is confronting the media and the left, not in spite of it. Many Republican politicians have done exactly as you suggest. Decorum. Manners. Civility. Marquis of Queensbury all the way.
They get their * kicked.
I like Ted, too. He would have gotten his * kicked by Hillary and the media.
quote:Originally posted by wallie
These are real aliens, ie: probably the anonymous sources that wrote the Trump article in the Blaze.
The Trump article is in the NEW YORK TIMES and is indeed anonymous. The commentary of THE BLAZE, the link I provided ABOUT it is spot on.
quote:Originally posted by bpost
I see many Fanatics here, that's cool but until Trump cools his jets over every perceived slight and stops reacting to the 93% negative press he gets it will only get worse for him and his effectiveness for you and me will diminish.
I did not vote for Trump, I am a Ted Cruz sort of guy.
You don't seem to understand that his effectiveness is because of how he is confronting the media and the left, not in spite of it. Many Republican politicians have done exactly as you suggest. Decorum. Manners. Civility. Marquis of Queensbury all the way.
They get their * kicked.
I like Ted, too. He would have gotten his * kicked by Hillary and the media.
You missunderstand also for that I blame my lack of written communication skills. There are many days I wish I had Don McManus's skills.
I have no problem with Trump calling out asshats in Congress, the Deep State and the DOJ. I have no problem with Trump calling the media biased.
It is dangerous and wrong for him to want to silence their criticism no matter how absurd. If Donald Trump expended 1/2 the energy he wastes on twittering meaningless retorts and lashing out against his Media detractors on our Nations ill's he would become a great President and the Media could do nothing to stop that from happening.
It is simple really; if you are focused on your work you don't have time to care what the booger eaters at the water cooler are saying about you. Your successes and positive efforts will outshine their nastiness.
Trump needs to shut up and be cool; do what he said he would do, drain the swamp, build the wall and keep the economy rolling a lot more than he has been lately.
I wish Trump would Twitter less and drain more. There are hundreds of them that need flushed down.
Really, I don't think teeting takes much of his time, and it seems to very effective at raising the blood pressure of some.
Margaret Thatcher
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
Mark Twain
https://i.imgur.com/lKyov19.jpg
Oh barfy.........
TRUMP GOT BEAT BY 3,000,000 VOTES IN THE POPULAR ELECTION. He is POTUS, and rightfully so, because of the genius of the Electoral College system.
Do not think this fact is lost on the (D)'s. They know Hillary was a turd candidate, she beat herself by being lazy and a nasty hag. The (D) party will not make that error again.
If Trump is to keep his voters, not just the fanatics, and grow the number bigly he will not see a second term. He can start by halving his tweets and cutting by 75% his reaction to every perceived slight. Fence sitters do not like his crap they will sour of his antics enough over time to vote against him to avoid four more years of it.
Sorry, but THAT happened as soon as he announced his candidacy. For years the Republicans have tried to play nice with others, with no success. The folks you listed above have been used as tools in a well orchestrated attack on every aspect of the life of the President.
When the left- in all it's flavors- acts like a barroom bully, I am NOT upset to see someone slap them silly. Frankly, its about damn time.
He has already alienated as well as motivated independents, women, many of the younger voters, and minorities.
Not a recipe for success.
That was the same message the media has broadcasting prior to the last election. They were wrong, actually they knew better, what they were doing was lying.
I read the media's own poll results and told one of the doctors I work with, Trump had more chance of winning than Hillary, he thought I was nuts. But the conclusions they were printing didn't match the data in their own polls, not if you dug the least bit.
Same thing now. Trump has not alienated the independents, that is make believe supported by flawed/fabricated data . In my own sphere of people I know he has not alienated any women that supported him before, the ones that didn't are screaming louder, so. Minority support hasn't changed, the Dems still carry the bulk of it, same as before.
When Obama was elected if motivated a lot of people against him, he was still re-elected. Trump will have a better chance to be re-elected than not.
He has already alienated as well as motivated independents, women, many of the younger voters, and minorities.
Not a recipe for success.
In your dreams, right before you wake up. Just like all the other libs.
Margaret Thatcher
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
Mark Twain
All of this reminds me of when I was a kid. When Regan shouted "mr gorbechev "TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" freedom loving people all over the world cheered! The snobs however went bat guano crazy claiming that Regan was starting a war, will end civilization as we know it, etc. The same type of people hate Trump, and for the same reason. Regan went over the heads of the media at the time and rallied the American people in spite of what the establishment on both sides wanted. Remember, they both hated Regan. What we are seeing in the complainers is the same thing when an abuser is loosing power. They get dangerous and start acting crazy because they are loosing their power. They will stop at nothing to try to keep it.
No truer words were ever said...