In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

hypothetical question

joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
given the notion that the 2a guarentees our right to unabstructed access and rights to firearms how would this law sit with people? for identifying criminals who should be unable to own firarms. (i know if the system worked this would be a non issue but bear with me) how about upon your birth you are issued a lifetime card. similar to a social security card. had your full name on it along with something to make it very difficult to copy or make a new one like a hologram or something and a photo of you just to verify your the owner of this card.. this card would not have any id # or be traced to a data base of any kind. or anything on it just says your name and maintain your right to own a firearm. anyone possesing this card can purchase/posses whatever their heart desires. if this card is lost just report it as so and new one would be issued. now if you are tried and convicted of a crime that warrents you a danger and unable to own a firearm your card is taken away. so john doe, upstanding citizen, walks in jane does gun shop and wantes to purchase a machine gun. pulls out the money for it and this card jane doe sees his pic verifies its him and sells it to him no paperwork required. dont need to call the pd or atf. would this be an acceptable alternative?

Comments

  • 45long45long Member Posts: 642 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    But what about AFTER said criminal has paid his debt to society? Does he get his card back ? After all the criminal justice sustem has deemed him safe enough to return to society. Shouldn't he get his card back and right restored?
  • jpwolfjpwolf Member Posts: 9,164
    edited November -1
    If the justice system hadn't been broken by bleeding hearts more concerned with the perp than the victim, that would be true 45.
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    in a system that worked yes. with the murderers,rapists,child molesters, and other life long violent criminals dead. and the criminals that did stupid snit when they were young and grew up let back out on the streets. yes these "criminals would recieve a new card.
  • HighballHighball Member Posts: 15,755
    edited November -1
    Josh;

    You are thinking.

    However, you still place the burden of proof on the decent Citizen to prove his innocence every time he moves a muscle.

    You dismiss entirely too easily the concept of forcing criminals to pay their debt to Society...ALL OF IT.
    (i know if the system worked this would be a non issue but bear with me)

    You must learn to DEMAND that vicious animals pay the ultimate price for their deeds...instead of attempting to force decent, law-abiding people to prove their bona fides ..that they are decent people.

    One does not solve the problem of a small number of deranged killers by forcing millions of innocent citizens to prove that they are innocent.

    There also is no place in the Constitution authorizing such behavior by the government.
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    i would demand that the visious animals pay the ultimate debt to society. it has long been my belief that once you kill,rape,molest someone that your life is forfeit. your debt to society is your life. perhaps in the society that many dream of even letting said society decide on his life. either end it or live the rest of your life in servitude to the society you attempted to take advantage of.
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    highball
    im afraid i dont quite understand your logic here please explain.

    i agree with you in your regards to the 2a. however the way our justice system works this is not possible. with the lame brains in office letteing anyone who says im sorry go there needs to be some way of telling who the crooks are. if the criminals were forced to pay their debt entirely this wouldnt be an issue. but they dont so it is. with criminals being let back out nto the streets wouldnt this be a viable alternative? a way to keep them in check while stepping on the 2a as little as possible? this card would have no id# on it. i said only similar to the ss card. it would have a photo of you and saying approved or whatever you wanted it to say. say your pulled over for speeding. you pull out your drivers liscense and proof of insurance along with this card and inform him your carrying. now everything is fine you get your ticket. i understand that the berden of proof still falls on you to prove your legal. but given the * system we currently have to deal with. what choice is there? the bottem line to all this is the system is * all the wayy around. and nothing short of revolution will change that in my grandchildrens time let alone mine. so given the sorry state we find ourselves in wouldnt this be a viable option?
  • nyforesternyforester Member Posts: 2,575 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by joshmb1982
    given the notion that the 2a guarentees our right to unabstructed access and rights to firearms how would this law sit with people? for identifying criminals who should be unable to own firarms. (i know if the system worked this would be a non issue but bear with me) how about upon your birth you are issued a lifetime card. similar to a social security card. had your full name on it along with something to make it very difficult to copy or make a new one like a hologram or something and a photo of you just to verify your the owner of this card.. this card would not have any id # or be traced to a data base of any kind. or anything on it just says your name and maintain your right to own a firearm. anyone possesing this card can purchase/posses whatever their heart desires. if this card is lost just report it as so and new one would be issued. now if you are tried and convicted of a crime that warrents you a danger and unable to own a firearm your card is taken away. so john doe, upstanding citizen, walks in jane does gun shop and wantes to purchase a machine gun. pulls out the money for it and this card jane doe sees his pic verifies its him and sells it to him no paperwork required. dont need to call the pd or atf. would this be an acceptable alternative?


    In 1933 Hitler did the same thing to the Jews so he could easily round them up....we all know the end result. No - I am sorry, your idea about the cards at birth is a bad idea. I don't need any gov't entity knowing if and how many firearms I own !
    Abort Cuomo
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    i said only similar to a social security card. the government wouldnt know if you bought and how many you bought. the seller would not be required t call in for a bakground check or any other check, and the card itself would not hold a record of sales. i dont see how this is like what hitler did. hitler issued the cards only to the jews/gypsies and other "undesirables" therby only the ones with the card were jewish and an easy target. this card im talking about would be given to everyone.
  • HighballHighball Member Posts: 15,755
    edited November -1
    Josh;
    You are a poster boy for collective thinking.

    You reject as unworkable holding individuals responsible for their OWN actions;

    You force an entire population to carry, keep up with, and be responsible for some `card' ..without which they may not exercise the freedoms of a Citizen.

    Somehow, in your mind, holding vicious savages to consequences is unworkable;
    Yet you WILL hold the great bulk of citizens responsible for THEIR actions.
    For without the card ..you are not a Citizen. You basically will make criminals out of 299 Million Souls ..because you refuse to hold the other million accountable.

    You fit nicely into Fox's and big governments' world. Congratulations.
  • Hunter MagHunter Mag Member Posts: 6,610 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I was thinking this has already been done in the form of a birth certificate.[:0]
  • BlueTicBlueTic Member Posts: 4,072
    edited November -1
    Hypotheticaly - The goverment needs only to keep a data base on criminals and their status. This should be easily accessable for all citizens to check a persons background. How much do you know about your daycare worker - nothing. How much do you know about your new neighbor who wants to swap rifles or buy one of yours- nothing. If they are not in the data base you have no major worries - unless your own senses are telling you there is a problem.
    Or current system wants to keep a data base on everybody and only have it accessable to LEOs or FFLs.
    The gov would scream and holler if this open information let people have control. Then they could not restrict anything or shift the burden of proof on to the individual. I know it sounds simple - but think about it.
  • jpwolfjpwolf Member Posts: 9,164
    edited November -1
    HB, I get the impression that Josh is very young. I will grant him some slack since he is freshly indoctrinated by the Public Indoctrination (School) System and it appears that he at least sees flaws and is trying to find a way to work around it with the knowledge he has. He will learn the right way in time. Watch and see. He sees the light and is testing the footing in the "lighted area" right now. He will step fully into it soon. Just needs a little patience and enlightenment from us about the true way a republic operates, not the way he was taught in school.[:D]
  • Hunter MagHunter Mag Member Posts: 6,610 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by jpwolf
    HB, I get the impression that Josh is very young. I will grant him some slack since he is freshly indoctrinated by the Public Indoctrination (School) System and it appears that he at least sees flaws and is trying to find a way to work around it with the knowledge he has. He will learn the right way in time. Watch and see. He sees the light and is testing the footing in the "lighted area" right now. He will step fully into it soon. Just needs a little patience and enlightenment from us about the true way a republic operates, not the way he was taught in school.[:D]

    Now that's a respectable approach. [;)]
    Kudos JP!!
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    highball

    you are mistaken in my beliefs in that is it unworkable holding individuals responsible for their OWN actions. i am a strong believer that i am my own keeper and solely responsible for my own actions. i decide wether an option is good or bad and suffer the consequences of it. and i have stated befor in this thread and others that i would hold individuals responsible for what they have done and make them pay for their own actions. if i knew how to find the specific thread i said them on id show you.

    in a perfect world your system would work beautifully. but this is by no means that world. if the 2nd revolution were over today and the country were restored to former self with everyone accountable for themselves no restrictions on anything. i would give this new america mabye as long as its been since the 1st revolution befor it to became corrupt. people are infinatly corruptable. why wouldnt the government follow the lead of the people? i am unaware of any organization/nation/whatever that started on the best of intentions and lasted indefinatly. can you point one out to me? people are greedy people are jeleous people are corrupt. a government started under the best of conditions with the greatest intentions is doomed to fail. it will always last up to a point. how can 300 million people ever agree on anything. take your brethren on here. say you what 13-14?? are the founding fathers and everyone thinks as you do on accountability. mabye not your kids or even your grand kids but somewhere down the line over time this view is going to change once again. so slowly at first you barely notice it but always gaining speed. and eventually were right back here again. it happend once right. here we are now. whats to stop it again? would you be willing to see your grandchildren banished not not holding to these believs?

    i honestly dont think my views are wholly different from your own. i just dont see how such a system could be maintained. and comparing me to tr fox is da-- near fighting words. i ABSOLUTLY DO NOT agree with 99% of the garbage that he posts. i would rather live a life devoid of human cantact then live a life with only people like him.
  • Marc1301Marc1301 Member Posts: 31,895 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    No cards for this cracker,.......track the criminals to their grave, or release into society after paying their debt.

    I am a law abiding citizen entitled to all of my rights under the Constitution, and I will not carry another "card" to prove that I am "safe."
    "Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here." - William Shatner
  • jpwolfjpwolf Member Posts: 9,164
    edited November -1
    Josh, when the new Constitution is written[;)] The only additions needed will be to make it clear that entitlements, subsidies, and tax breaks (which are a form of subsidy) will never, under any circumstances be allowed. (eliminating welfare and special interests).[:D] And it will be made clear that there will never ever be an income tax.
  • Canary ass no. 1Canary ass no. 1 Member Posts: 104 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote: i just dont see how such a system could be maintained. and comparing me to tr fox is da-- near fighting words. i ABSOLUTLY DO NOT agree with 99% of the garbage that he posts. i would rather live a life devoid of human cantact then live a life with only people like him.
    (Highball) Good show, Josh..and EXACTLY the response hoped for.

    Now ..the system quite possible could NOT be maintained ..at least not without major revisions to the Constitution

    Perhaps something along the lines of a written in death penalty for contravening the Constitution with gun control laws or taking of Private Property for Business..?

    Yes ..I full understand that we are talking about two different things;
    The world as it IS;
    And the World as it SHOULD be.

    The thing to remember is ..unless you understand the `ideal' world ..one where vicious animals are executed, within a month ..then you are hopelessly bound up in trying to figure out a `card' for honest, decent citizens so they somehow can `prove' that they ARE humans...

    Nosir..the proper response to evil lawmakers is to hold their feet to the fire..DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY for the savages that walk among us.

    Do not allow them to add yet MORE layers of accountability for decent citizens.
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    agreed that the violent offenders (in the sense that i interpret violent offenders anyway) should be put to death immediatly if not sooner and the judges/prosicuters.... whio let them free should take their place. also any conveining authority who cospired to wrongly convict a person should take the place of their victem. as for any lawmakers who undermine our rights to further their own agenda should be severly punished though i dont know if i particularly want the death penalty for it. more like perminently forbidden from any office and forbidden from contact with anyone in office. kind of like a perminent parole. but then are we limiting their rights as citizens??? where do you strike a balance? it cant be any more one way then the other with any hope of surviving.
  • Canary ass no. 1Canary ass no. 1 Member Posts: 104 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Those that serve in public offices NEED to be held to a higher standards then ordinary Citizens.
    They have much more responsibility...and much more chance to do harm.

    Public Elective Office NEEDS to be forced on a man ..not something eagerly sought out as a means to serve six years and have your needs taken care of for the rest of your life...

    The equation is simple;

    While in public office for your 2-4-6 years...resist corruption, or suffer the consequences of your actions.

    That goes for Police Officers, dogcatchers, mayors ..or the president.
  • 45long45long Member Posts: 642 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Josh,,, this is the same Government that said that a Social Security Card would never be used as a form of identfication. *L* yeah right. That has worked out so well. So your idea is to trust them NEVER to use your card as a means to track gun owners or what they have.

    Somehow I don't think it would be as benine or innocent as you hope. After all, every knows that if you want to screw up a perfectly good idea, give it to the government to impliment.
  • Marc1301Marc1301 Member Posts: 31,895 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by 45long
    Josh,,, this is the same Government that said that a Social Security Card would never be used as a form of identfication. *L* yeah right. That has worked out so well. So your idea is to trust them NEVER to use your card as a means to track gun owners or what they have.

    Somehow I don't think it would be as benine or innocent as you hope. After all, every knows that if you want to screw up a perfectly good idea, give it to the government to impliment.

    45long,......great post.
    Try going to a doctor even, at least in my area, and refusing to give your SS#.

    I tried it! After explaining that they have no right to ask for that info,.......I was politely informed that I WAS correct.
    I was then told to go down the road, and attempt to find an MD that would accept my beliefs.

    BTW,......on the "illegal" NICS checks, I never fill out my SS#, for what it's worth.[xx(][xx(]
    "Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here." - William Shatner
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    read my first post.

    SIMILAR TO a social security card. had your full name on it along with something to make it very difficult to copy or make a new one like a hologram or something and a photo of you just to verify your the owner of this card.. this card would not have any id # or be traced to a data base of any kind. or anything on it just says your name and maintain your right to own a firearm.

    how could this be used as an id. there is no # associated with it. agreed though that the feds can screw up the best of ideas.
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by joshmb1982
    read my first post.

    SIMILAR TO a social security card. had your full name on it along with something to make it very difficult to copy or make a new one like a hologram or something and a photo of you just to verify your the owner of this card.. this card would not have any id # or be traced to a data base of any kind. or anything on it just says your name and maintain your right to own a firearm.

    how could this be used as an id. there is no # associated with it. agreed though that the feds can screw up the best of ideas.


    Well a photo wouldn't work, unless you are getting a new card every year, as people can change hair style/color.

    So that leaves it to somehow tying in psyical info.

    Who is to say, that you couldn't hand said card over, OR it be stolen and used?
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    in the event of it being stolen the theif would have to look like you to use i or seller wouldnt sell to them. for the picture part. how about when you renew your drivers liscence mail in a current photo if you renew through usps or if you go to dmv bring a current photo and they can insert new photo there? the average joe once you get into your 20s doesnt change so much in 5 years as to be unrecognizable.
  • 45long45long Member Posts: 642 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Josh,,,,,,,,,,I did read your first post. You missed the point. You can't trust the government. If it is an issued card of any kind from the government then it can be abused and meanieized into whatever THEY want. Period. What about that simple concept,(fact) do you not understand? It might start innocently enough but I promise you that in short time it will not stay that way. It will be used against the public and the reasoning will sound so reasonable that everyone will say " Hey thats a great idea. After all it's for our protection".
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    i understand the fact that you can not ever trust your government. what i dont understand is how a simple card with no other info on it other then your photo your name and something stating that your felony free could be corrupted.

    highball
    if the duty of office was forced upon a man what if he refused? would this be a similar deal to jury duty either show up or go to jail? what would be the pay grade? would there be a standard or same as what he made befor coming into office. if a man is forced into unwillingly serving his country wouldnt this man not do as good a job as someone who at least said ok fine ill do it. though i agree on the conept. anyone who would activly campaign/seek to be president must have some sort of power issues.
  • 45long45long Member Posts: 642 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It's simple Josh,,,,It HAS TO BE KEPT TRACK OF. If it is issued then there is a way to track it. There is a record of it somewhere. There has to be. It is a simple fact of Governemnt life. If it issued, there is a number to keep track of who it is issued to. If there is a number,(and there has to be), then it trackable and corruptable. No way around it. Without it being trackable or a record of it somewhere then it is a useless, worthless piece of paper.
  • Canary ass no. 1Canary ass no. 1 Member Posts: 104 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Civic duty, Josh;

    Were it a part of early schooling and possibly school course, everybody would understand that getting tapped on the shoulder would oblige you to serve..much as a jury, as you mentioned.

    We operate under the assumption that people that run for office are somehow 'better trained, more knowledgeable' then ordinary people...and I give you obama. there can be no more unfit person alive to run for high office.
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    with the government being the ones issueing it you would be correct that some how some way they would corrupt it as they have everything else theyve touched. this idea poped into my head a few days ago and thought id see what you guys thought of it. perhaps if this were done with a government as highball would set up with men of character running the show it could work. but i agree that in all likelyhood it could not. it has made for a very interesting discussion though. perhaps opened my eyes just a little bit more.
  • 45long45long Member Posts: 642 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Josh,, True. Unfortunately, at some point alledged men of character become what we have today. Regardless of what Government is set up. Which is why Jeffereson made the comment about the tree of Liberty.
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    my best friend gave me a card for my bday back in may. had hillary sitting at a podium looking all smug with president of the united states written on the podium. and it said " see there are worse things in life then getting older". that was befor obama was nominated. he would have worked equally well in the card though. [:D]
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    the tree of liberty. is that the part about needing to be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants? or something like that?
  • Canary ass no. 1Canary ass no. 1 Member Posts: 104 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Josh; Yes, indeed. You nailed it about the Tree.

    In the first years of the Republic, freedom/laws looked like this;


    Freedom....................................Laws
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++#######

    Today we have;
    Laws.........................................Freedom
    ############################################++++++++

    History proves that government seeks only to grow bigger and more powerful. Eventually, at some point, slit trenches will be dug for the bodies of 'enemies of the state'. It never fails.
  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    so its taken what 232 years for us to get to this situation. you would need a revolution every 100 years or sooner to keep the feds in check. could any cotry sustain itself through all that.
Sign In or Register to comment.