In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Obama's New Gun Control Agenda

RogueStatesmanRogueStatesman Member Posts: 5,760
Gun Control Coming?
Take a look at this link:

Obama and his Liberal minions are at it again! Bunch of Terrorists!![:(!]



  • Options
    USN_AirdaleUSN_Airdale Member Posts: 2,987
    edited November -1
    i have been fighting this "gun control" BS since 1964ad.., that's 47 years folks ! and in those 47 years the NRA has urged our representatives to "compromise" with the rabid left who have but one agenda, and that is to have our Second Amendment banished from existence.

    first we must find a way to penetrate the thick skulls of our enemy, the liberals, it has been said that guns have only two enemies, they are rust and liberals, any "gun law" that is presently in effect or any new laws will only hamper the activities and pursuits of honest law abiding citizens, criminals obey NO gun laws, the only laws they do obey are the petty laws such as what we might call common curtesy every day living stuff.

    as soon as we with common sense can convince the gun haters there is NO law that will stop a criminal, we will win.
  • Options
    jev1969jev1969 Member Posts: 2,691
    edited November -1
    But in the next two weeks, the White House will unveil a new gun-control effort in which it will urge Congress to strengthen current laws, which now allow some mentally unstable people, such as alleged Arizona shooter Jared Loughner, to obtain certain assault weapons, in some cases without even a background check.

    1. Since when is a Glock pistol considered an "assault weapon"

    2. Read the last line, ...without even a backround check. Being no firearm is sold from an FFL without a backround check this can only mean one thing, they want to target private party transactions.[:(!]
  • Options
    torosapotorosapo Member Posts: 4,946
    edited November -1
    The only way to stop private sales without backgrond check is to register all firearms in the country. I don't see that happening, but I may be wrong.
  • Options
    theJohnDillytheJohnDilly Member Posts: 10 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    People believe the government wants to eliminate guns because that is what we hear from the media. The simple fact is, if you ask people if they can believe what they hear and see in the media, they will tell you that you cannot. Still, the media promotes removal of gun ownership from the people of our nation. But is that really the intent of the powers that be? If it is, why has their campaign caused more people to buy guns and why are guns more available today than ever.

    In the years since the first Brady Bill gun ownership has risen to over 100 times the guns that were owned before the gun control scare. If Corp. U.S. really wanted to get rid of the guns, do you think you would still have them (except stored secretly)? Reports indicate that, under the threat of gun control, in the last ten years more guns have been produced and sold to Americans than all of the guns that were ever owned before in the history of our nation. Using this outcome as evidence, it indicates the powers that be are doing what they are doing to cause the people of America to arm themselves while they limit the capability of those arms. That is certainly the effect of their campaign, regardless of popular opinion. Thus, we call it a myth.

    Put that together with the fact that the verdict of the United Nations conference on World Population in Cairo was that they need to reduce the World's Population by at least Six Billion people! That was a call to eliminate six out of every seven people! That call was made nearly ten years ago with a global population of Seven Billion +, today I heard that the world's population is only Five Billion people. To maintain zero population growth a nation has to have a birth rate of at least 2.1%. The current birth rate in the United States is .8%. When the Cairo Conference took place there were 350 million people in the United States. Today, there are only 291 million people. These figures spell serious economic difficulties in ten years if something does not change.

    Then consider the almost annual events that take place on the anniversary of Great Britain's attack on Lexington and Concord, April 19th-the United States Government admits its representatives: attacked and killed (murdered) the Randy Weaver Family at Ruby Ridge, Idaho without just cause; attacked and killed almost the entire parish of the Seventh-Day Adventist Church in Waco, Texas (the Branch Davidians); provided the explosives and participated in the first World Trade Center bombing, eight people were killed and 1,000 were injured; further, evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates they blew up their Murrah Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (though they have not admitted their participation in that yet); and there is a massive cover-up now going on as to their involvement in the WTC and Pentagon attacks from last September 11th (the big question is where is any evidence of the airliner that allegedly hit the Pentagon). Interestingly enough that attack against the people of our nation took place on 911 (their emergency code).

    Then compare the result of these acts of terror against our people and notice the outcome. Notice Corp. U.S. creating a "security envelope" around the people violating your God given inherent rights secured to you by our Constitution; notice the exact same pattern of events that took place in Hitler's Germany as he started W.W.II and instituted his SS (State Security Police, a.k.a. Homeland Security). Compare that to Bush instituting his HS (Homeland Security Police). We expect they will continue to tighten their "security" grip until they destroy our economy causing starvation and rebellion.

    Thus, we expect that is their intent-to cause a revolution that will reduce our nation to a similar status with any third world power so they can institute their global new world communistic order control with 6,000,000,000 less people. After all, isn't that what they already agreed to do in their Cairo Conference. It should be no surprise that they may be working to that end.

    Having reviewed these factual outcomes, please remember gun control is not factually a myth; the reality is every year more efforts are clearly focused on either gun or ammunition controls. Thus, this response to such controls simply provides a theory based on reviewing the outcome we before us-which is the stuff from which mythology is made. Accordingly, we presented this myth merely as food for thought - presented to cause a person to notice one of the ways of debunking mythology is to notice outcome.

    Regardless of what a person says, "by their fruits ye shall know them". When we see the powers of governance doing things that cause people to start the Patriot Movement, the Tax Protest Movement and the Legal Research Movement we see an awakening in our nation. It is evident the people are working hard to discover the truth about what is happening.

    The question regarding the purpose of Corp. U.S'. gun politics is not the myth, rather it is a warning; and, the evidence is not all in yet. We presented it here to set a standard for watching and preparing for any outcome. Since President Franklin D. Roosevelt amended the Trading with the Enemy Act in 1933, Corp. U.S. has legislatively recognized that the people of this country are Corp. U.S' enemies; accordingly, it should be no surprise that there is a possibility that they are working on causing the people to rebel against them; so, they can quash the rebellion and with it your right to private property and with that our nation.

    Other steps they have taken in the last few years to promote such changes include the unlawful P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act, the Homeland Security Act and the latest stab the new Mandatory Health Act. Each of these Acts were made absent the aid of lawful authority constitutionally granted to Congress by the people. Each of these Acts were made to usurp extra constitutional authority over the people. Again, such Acts are technically Acts of war against the people and such Acts give cause for the people to learn the law and apply it so we can lawfully win our nation back.

    Thus, we remind you, the King of Kings has said in this war we cannot raise conventional weapons of war and win. In this war we must first get ourselves right personally and spiritually, we must repent and we must prepare by learning who we are and by learning the Law. Then we must win by applying the Law. This is the only way we can be sure to win our nation back legally, lawfully and with our lawful system intact secured and operating explicitly according to the Constitution of the United States of America.
  • Options
    fyrfinderfyrfinder Member Posts: 205 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    So, is it going to be announced or not? Been two weeks since the state of the union thingy. Is it the ban on hi-cap magazines? Is that it? I know several weapons that would be declared "prohibited" because they don't make 10 shot or less magazines for them ...

    Sounds like an attempt to boost the economy by running the prices up on certain items (shades of the brady bill) or maybe they will put hi cap magazines on the class three category so the it requires a $200 tax to possess one? What a joke ..... pay the government for a full auto Thompson ........ but let's keep it down to a 10 round drum magazine because some mental case is going to buy one in a sport shop over the counter and shoot up a town hall meeting. Then sheriff Dufuss ...(did I get that name right? Can't remember) can play it out in the media again. [:(!]
Sign In or Register to comment.