In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
NRA at the white house
Sooeyman2035
Member Posts: 3,226
Seems as though the Biden Gun Control committee wants to include the NRA in their deliberations for what is good for the American peasants. Why just the NRA. How about the other gun rights organizations? Makes you wonder doesn't it?
Comments
Makes you wonder doesn't it?
Nope.
BUT, it is AFTER the meet with the Rabidly Anti-Gun Orgs.
Looks like we will be sucking Hind Teat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o48aZ_C52wc
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Seems as though the Biden Gun Control committee wants to include the NRA in their deliberations for what is good for the American peasants. Why just the NRA. How about the other gun rights organizations? Makes you wonder doesn't it?
Since they supported Pushed NFA1934, GCA1968, They'll likely have a hand in AWB2013, but I hope I am wrong about the last one
quote:Originally posted by Sooeyman2035
Seems as though the Biden Gun Control committee wants to include the NRA in their deliberations for what is good for the American peasants. Why just the NRA. How about the other gun rights organizations? Makes you wonder doesn't it?
Since they supported Pushed NFA1934, GCA1968, They'll likely have a hand in AWB2013, but I hope I am wrong about the last one
I hope you are wrong also...But i very much doubt it. History show's you are not.
Here is a tribute to our 2A rights:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o48aZ_C52wc
Not funny[:(]
Seems as though the Biden Gun Control committee wants to include the NRA in their deliberations for what is good for the American peasants. Why just the NRA. How about the other gun rights organizations? Makes you wonder doesn't it?
Why the NRA? That's simple.
The NRA is closer in-tune to the Biden Committee's agenda than any other gun rights organization in the country. Matter of fact, I would say that they are decidedly in favor of that agenda. Too many people out there believe that it would be just fine, as long as their hunting rifles and the like are left alone. The problem is, the 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting. Hunting is a privilege, firearms ownership is a right. A right that is guaranteed.
Just like 1994, and years previous, a simple handshake, a few "attaboys", and we'll be thrown under the proverbial bus yet again.
FLAME ON sorry that is just the way I feel.
W.D.
1. Transfers between Family should be exempt.
2. Confiscation on death of owner should not be tolerated.
3. 22 Calibers should be exempt.
4. All future firearms developments that see guns that only fire for their owners should be exempt from all provisions of the ban.
5. Registration under the NFA cannot be accepted. If there is to be a compromise then require registration at the state level.
I oppose it ALL but the above is the most offensive about the proposed AWB.
Thing to remember is this will effect future gun enthusiasts more then it will we who already have a lot of what will be banned. Think about our Generations kids and grandkids.
I disagree The NRA has more CLOUT good or bad then any SECOND rate or johnny come lately gun owners group. show me one thing these groups have done for you when it comes to laws passed . . show me where the money goes to help us with these groups. All they do is divide us [V]
FLAME ON sorry that is just the way I feel.
The NRA has supported gun control since it's creation. It's been balls deep in getting gun control enacted into law starting with the 1932 Uniform Firearms Act, then the 1933 National Firearms Act and all it's permutations, the 1938 Federal Firearms Act, the 1968 Gun Control Act, the Hughes Amendment, bullet bans, magazine bans, the 1994 AWB, etc, etc. See a pattern here? It has never stopped any national level initiative from becoming law nor has it gotten anything already enacted into law repealed. It's actions in both the Heller and McDonald case's was nothing short of disgraceful.
So if they're sitting at the white house table to talk about future initiative's and the compromise's needed for passage I'd be very very nervous, especially considering their history.
Clout...???...what clout???!!??!!