In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

Ballistic Fingerprinting question @ vote.com

bama55bama55 Member Posts: 6,389 ✭✭
edited October 2002 in Gun Rights and Constitutional Law
Last I saw it was 75% no and 25% yes. Come on folks, go vote!!

http://www.vote.com/vote/51129540/index.phtml?cat=4075633

Also posted on Gen. Discussion.

Don't send flowers when I die. Send money now, I can buy more ammo.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • Options
    AlpineAlpine Member Posts: 15,052 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Still running No (75%), Yes (25%).

    "If you ain't got pictures, I wasn't there."
    ?The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.?
    Margaret Thatcher

    "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
    Mark Twain
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ballistic Fingerprinting is pointless and stupid. As a forensic tool used and required by 2 states already, it has a track record of ZERO solved homicides, and would use up literally millions to billions to keep running.

    When will they ever learn???

    Death to Tyrants!!!

    Jesus Christ believed in the right to keep and bear arms, Luke 22:36.

    -Gunphreak
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    gunnut505gunnut505 Member Posts: 10,290 ✭
    edited November -1
    "Ballistic Fingerprinting" is unworkable, smoke n' mirrors scheme to pre-register your firearms. The idea sounds good until you think about it for a second.
    Unless all 547 million firearms in this country are "fingerprinted" with all types of ammunition prior to the installation of the database, and then all NEW firearms are subjected to the same nonsense; it will never work.
    The database containing the "old" guns' data would be enormous-on the order of seventy billion gigabytes with multiple entries and photographs of each projectile/firearm combination-and then add all new guns and ammo...I don't think so.
    You'd still have to account for all the switch-barrel guns ie: 1911's, 10-22's, shotguns with chokes, etc. because the "fingerprint" can be altered by simply putting a new barrel on.
    Then you'd have to stop commerce in polishing compounds like David Tubbs' Final Finish and JB Bore Paste because they would change the "fingerprint" as well.
    Smarmy political weasels (sorry, weasels)like Chuck Schumer will try to convince you that it is a reasonable step to try to stop the slaughter of innocent blah, blah....so use the other organs God gave you and THINK IT THROUGH.

    If you know it all; you must have been listening.WEAR EAR PROTECTION!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'm not even sure what this is about, when no vote should be casted, as a violation of the 4th Amendment.

    Death to Tyrants!!!

    Jesus Christ believed in the right to keep and bear arms, Luke 22:36.

    -Gunphreak
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    IIISKAREIIKROIIIIIISKAREIIKROIII Member Posts: 252 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    voting, wtf. its like that site votenowar.org or something, REDICULOUS...

    S.K.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The truth about ballistic fingerprinting.

    http://www.flashbunny.org/content/fingerprint.html

    Death to Tyrants!!!

    Jesus Christ believed in the right to keep and bear arms, Luke 22:36.

    -Gunphreak
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.