In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

More Interesting reading on the WTC "collapse"

trstonetrstone Member Posts: 833 ✭✭✭✭
edited December 2003 in Gun Rights and Constitutional Law
Try this website: http://members.fortunecity.com/911/

Interesting reading, and possible grounds for suspecting the veracity of the "official" storyline about the 9-11 WTC attacks.

I've had enough physics and math (and chemistry) that I find some of these ideas very thought-provoking, if not downright disturbing.

This post is also in response to a request I received for more information on this issue.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • trstonetrstone Member Posts: 833 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    And a little more food for thought:

    http://physics911.org/net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=19

    Thought-provoking....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    yes, very thought provoking.

    When guns were invented everything changed. For the first time in the history of the world a frail woman had a chance to sucessfully defend herself and home. My dream is that one of the anti-gun nuts will need a gun for defense and be unable to have one because of their own actions.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AlpineAlpine Member Posts: 15,092 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    They are full of BS. This guy may be able to led the ill-informed down this path, but if you studied a little about the mechinics of an explosion you would know what he is saying is BS.

    "If you ain't got pictures, I wasn't there."
    ?The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.?
    Margaret Thatcher

    "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
    Mark Twain
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • trstonetrstone Member Posts: 833 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    And you have, I suppose?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • flat8flat8 Member Posts: 887 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Seems they were able to plant explosives JUST BELOW where the aircraft impacted each of the towers. THAT would be a some trick. Either they were able to endure temps exceeding 1000 degrees when they planted the explosives, or they knew EXACTLY where the planes would hit each tower ahead of time . . and were able to keep the explosives from detonating during the initial fireball that immediately followed the impacts. C'mon. The truth is that 19 suicidal Islamic terrorists hijacked 4 aircraft and piloted two into the the Twin Towers.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AlpineAlpine Member Posts: 15,092 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    trstone: Yes. Bomb Arson School in Texas.

    "If you ain't got pictures, I wasn't there."
    ?The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.?
    Margaret Thatcher

    "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
    Mark Twain
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Red223Red223 Member Posts: 7,946
    edited November -1
    The only thing that has me is trstone's link that mentioned Andrews AFB. Since the fall of Russia the U.S. Air Force no longer keeps a couple loaded F-16's sitting on the pad with pilots sitting by 24/7 on our borders.

    Andrews AFB, Dover AFB, and Mcguire AFB all are either cargo aircraft, KC-135 refuelers, and Air Force One aircraft. I think the Guard and Reserves have fighters in the area but not Active Air Force craft.

    The first fighters to respond had no armaments. Were only there for show.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TRAP55TRAP55 Member Posts: 8,291 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    RED223...For what its worth, the Air Guard in Fresno,CA keeps 2 F-16's on the pad fully loaded and ready to go 24/7. At full after burner the border in either direction is only minutes away.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • mpolansmpolans Member Posts: 1,752 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I assure you that at least ONE of the bases you've mentioned has F-16s fully ready to take care of business if you fly near/over certain restricted airspace in the vicinity.

    quote:Originally posted by Red223
    The only thing that has me is trstone's link that mentioned Andrews AFB. Since the fall of Russia the U.S. Air Force no longer keeps a couple loaded F-16's sitting on the pad with pilots sitting by 24/7 on our borders.

    Andrews AFB, Dover AFB, and Mcguire AFB all are either cargo aircraft, KC-135 refuelers, and Air Force One aircraft. I think the Guard and Reserves have fighters in the area but not Active Air Force craft.

    The first fighters to respond had no armaments. Were only there for show.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.