How will the awb sunset affect California ?

gonzo1510

I am wondering how the "A.W.B" will affect the peoples republic.
Will there be a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the ban, once the '94 ban sunsets? more specifically will someone ask for an injunction on the state from enforcing the ban?

WoundedWolf

Kalifornia already has a separate AWB that is more restrictive than the Fed AWB. And I believe that the Kali AWB does not have a sunset provision, it is state law.

I don't think Kalifornia will affected by the Fed AWB sunset at all.

-WW

"...That the people have a right to keep and bear arms; that a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defence of a free state."

-The Debates in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Virginia, on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution. June 27, 1788.

dsmith

Dianne Swinestein has already given Kalifornistan a full fleged full time non expiring assault ban to the best of my knowledge. Either get her out of office, or move to a free state.

dsmith

If the assault ban expires you Kalifornistanis will be able to look at pictures of cheaper high capacity magazines in your cheaper that dirt catalog. You can also see a lower price on semi auto watered down civilian versions of real guns (for people in a free state that is).

As far as your rights go... You can decide which one of Dianne Swinesteine's "approved" guns you can own, and after how much paperwork and how many pricy licenses.

gonzo1510

Thanks for the answers... but I dont think I got what I was looking for....

Salvage33

There will be no change for those of you in the PRK since the state laws are more restrictive than the federal law.

John


A friend will post your bail. A good friend will be sitting next to you in the cell saying, "man that was fun!"

dsmith

What I was trying to say earlier is that federal law doesn't matter to Kalifornians. State law is much worse there. No Assault Rifles, no hi capacity magazines. No expiration date. Just hope for a repeal.

pickenup

I have heard of NO rumors of any challenge to the state law, once the federal law goes away. [:(]


The gene pool needs chlorine.

gunphreak

I would say we have a better chance of a Kalifornian Exodus before we have a repeal or a judge properly exerting his authority to declare this edict unconstitutional.

Think of it as a relocation of troops. That would be great (wishful thinking), to have all the non-connected gun owners move to other states, leaving defenseless liberals to see just how good their policies really are.

I'd rather have those who would fight here with us, and let the rest of the country see how great gun kontrol really is, because they aren't listening to Australia and the UK, or DC, for that matter.

Death to Tyrants!!!
Lev 26:14-39

Remember how many seats were lost after AWB passage? Vae victis!
Those who would offer any interpretation that would relegate Amendment II to "relic" status of a bygone era are blatantly stating that the remainder of the Bill of Rights isn't worth a damn, either.

Luke 22:36.

WoundedWolf

The Exodus is already underway. I am a born and raised 4th generation Californian. As of last month I am now a Nevadan. It is a shame to see a great state crumble under the mismanagement of liberal socialists.

I feel there is no hope for California. I can only encourage my remaining family to leave the state as soon as they are able (at least the ones who haven't bought into the liberal brainwashing).

The liberals continue to "socialize" the state while Mexican nationals increase their population and power in the state. They are claiming more and more rights, such as valid driver's licenses and even the right to VOTE (these are non-citizens that are in this country illegally!).

I see that the liberals are disarming the population of California and are trying to "sensitize" the population towards "multiculturalism". This is going to lead to a hostile takeover by the majority hispanic population, and they will find little resistance from the disarmed public (both literally and mentally). The liberals will probably embrace Mexican rule while being subjugated to the violent and corrupt style of government that we repeatedly see in Latin America.

This same mentality is why liberals cannot fight terrorists. They are too concerned with embracing the enemy that would rather cut their throat. Michael Savage is right, liberalism is a mental disorder. Liberals have lost all sense of self-preservation. They truly believe that they are leading society to a "greater good" that they would gladly trade their life for. What they don't see is that this will only allow the unenlightened and uncivilized masses of the world to more easily take over our society. It is the ultimate "Helsinki Syndrome". Every liberal loves to perceive themself as a victim and a martyr, and they try to do whatever they can to allow themselves to be victimized so that they can perpetuate their victimization and self-martyrdom.

These are the true "sheeple". Just like lambs to the slaughter, too blinded by their own dillusion of grandeur.

Sorry for getting off topic.

-WW

"...That the people have a right to keep and bear arms; that a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defence of a free state."

-The Debates in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Virginia, on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution. June 27, 1788.

gonzo1510

Man,


That was truly Beautiful...............

gunphreak

That was inciteful. Don't mind us.. we're listening, and I'm glad to see you had the brains to leave.

Death to Tyrants!!!
Lev 26:14-39

Remember how many seats were lost after AWB passage? Vae victis!
Those who would offer any interpretation that would relegate Amendment II to "relic" status of a bygone era are blatantly stating that the remainder of the Bill of Rights isn't worth a damn, either.

Luke 22:36.

CA sucks

yep, thanks to our laws one could be technically called a criminal for failing to register a pistol with a high cap mag(that holds something like 11 or 13 rounds, whopedy do). The shame I see is that the people in agricultural areas here that were here first and have been on the same ranch or farm for many generations have to choose between their rights and their family heritage, california is already over developed, and an exodus would open up so much land for low income housing ghettos that serve as breeeding areas for crime (where your as likely to get stabbed or clubbed as to get shot,). If this "exodus of non liberals" happens, the state will be flooded even faster with immigrants, who will then diffuse into other states, Im afraid that california will become the first domino to fall.

Oh and rldowns3, your probaly right, I've edited my post so maybe you should edit yours too, lest some uptight LEOs cruise by these forums

Im from California and I strongly support our right to bear arms, I do however strongly support Gun Control-> Of course, Gun Control means using both hands