In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Hypocrites In california

65gto38965gto389 Member Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭✭✭
It is no secret that barbra boxer of Ca. Is opposed to guns in any way shape or form. But what you may not know is that she has a Concealed carry permit. I know what you are thinking , go figure. This is the ultimate use of flip flopping on issuse and when I wrote to the so called senator, I still have reveieved no response.

Comments

  • gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    No kidding?? So is Senator Dianne Swinestein. Here are people in the top 10 people I won't mourn for when they die.

    Death to Tyrants!!!
    Lev 26:14-39

    Those who would offer any interpretation that would relegate Amendment II to "relic" status of a bygone era are blatantly stating that the remainder of the Bill of Rights isn't worth a damn, either.

    Luke 22:36.
    "Followers of Christ, be armed."
  • CJ7nvrstkCJ7nvrstk Member Posts: 678 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Are you actually surprised? I wouldn't be if it turned out to be true. Just like Democrats to do something like that.

    Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I can not change, the courage to change the things I can, and the weaponry to make the difference.
  • pickenuppickenup Member Posts: 22,846 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Please don't take this wrong, but I would like to know where you got this info? A news release of California CCW holders, or in some email you received, or??

    Not doubting you, and I would not be surprised (as many anti-gun people own and carry firearms) just want to be able to back up my facts, if I choose to post this elsewhere.

    The gene pool needs chlorine.
  • 65gto38965gto389 Member Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    To answer your question I got my info from three sources. #1 Americas 1st freedom (forget which issue) which everyone knows is the NRA's premier magazine in which they pointed out such Discrepancies like the one in this topic. #2 various articles from the shotgun news. #3 from reading various newspapers and news articles looking for such info.

    Just as a reminder I still have not receieved a reply form Ca. senator barbra boxer on why does she oppose guns but still carries.

    Hope this has been helpful.
  • pickenuppickenup Member Posts: 22,846 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thanks.
    Let us know IF you get an answer.

    Welcome to the forums.

    The gene pool needs chlorine.
  • gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Why does Barbara Boxer oppose gun, but carries one?

    Simple. Because Barbara Boxer is only really partially opposed to guns. She realizes that guns are tools, but that they are too complex for you to use, and too dangerous to allow you to have if you are smart enough to use them.

    Translation: So that when you figure out that we are responsible for why you are in destitude, you don't kill our sorry @$$3$.

    Death to Tyrants!!!
    Lev 26:14-39

    Those who would offer any interpretation that would relegate Amendment II to "relic" status of a bygone era are blatantly stating that the remainder of the Bill of Rights isn't worth a damn, either.

    Luke 22:36.
    "Followers of Christ, be armed."
  • gonzo1510gonzo1510 Member Posts: 751 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by pickenup
    Please don't take this wrong, but I would like to know where you got this info? A news release of California CCW holders, or in some email you received, or??

    Not doubting you, and I would not be surprised (as many anti-gun people own and carry firearms) just want to be able to back up my facts, if I choose to post this elsewhere.

    The gene pool needs chlorine.


    Feinstien replied to one of my emails and verified the yes she did have a CCW but has since turned in her guns and her permit.

    "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." Edmund Burke
  • 65gto38965gto389 Member Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I do not doubt that e-amil you receieved was spoken by her, but Do you really believe her? She carries a gun; and along with roise o'donnel and ted kennedy (all liberal anti-gun Who*es) has armed body guards with uzi's around them at all times.
  • jimbowbyjimbowby Member Posts: 3,496
    edited November -1
    [8D]Hey "GOAT" then why are you waiting for an answer to your (e-amil),because you won't believe it anyway[?][?][?][?][?][?][:D]

    I'm only wearing Black untill they make something darker
  • 65gto38965gto389 Member Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I will say this only once. My e-mail was directed to barbra boxer and not Dianne Fienstein.
  • gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    They lie about everything. You have only to take heed to what they have done, and decide what they are from that point, and that is it.

    That Swinestein may no longer have any guns or a permit now doesn't overshadow the fact that she did, and as far as I'm concerned, she is still guilty, and will remain so until that hag either dies, or does a 180, and not before.

    Death to Tyrants!!!
    Lev 26:14-39

    Those who would offer any interpretation that would relegate Amendment II to "relic" status of a bygone era are blatantly stating that the remainder of the Bill of Rights isn't worth a damn, either.

    Luke 22:36.
    "Followers of Christ, be armed."
  • 65gto38965gto389 Member Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I must agree with user gunphreak. What is said and what is done is two different things (hence the title of this topic). You must trust your own judgement.
  • judgelynchjudgelynch Member Posts: 2 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    What most fail to understand is that liberals don't want YOU to have a gun! Every liberal I have met owns a gun for self defence. They just don't trust you with one.
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    Such things happen a lot! yet I have never been able to understand why the pro-gun groups can't find some way to destroy such hypocrites as Boxer.

    Kinda like a politician making their career on fighting child porn and then it is discovered that politician has a extensive collection and enjoys child porn.

    If that happened that politician's career would be over. Same thing should happen with boxer but for some reason it doesn't.

    Does anyone know why?

    Quote "Somehow government decided that the Constitutional Bill of Rights has become the Bill of "Suggested" Rights and are to be rationed to the citizens as the power elite sees fit"
  • gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ok, Fox, you know why as well as I do. There isn't a single so-called "antigun" politician on any level that is truly antigun.

    They are selectively pro-gun and by that, it means that only agents of the state have proper justification to own and use a weapon for self defense, because in their mind's eye, they are just too important to become a victim. That doesn't apply to any of us.

    Only regular people could be so stupid. Politicians are not. They may sound stupid to those of us who know better, but to those who don't know better, they accept whatever they are told by those they stupidly trust as their leaders.

    There is a huge lack of integrity involved here, and every single one of them are traitors.

    Death to Tyrants!!!
    Lev 26:14-39

    Those who would offer any interpretation that would relegate Amendment II to "relic" status of a bygone era are blatantly stating that the remainder of the Bill of Rights isn't worth a damn, either.

    Luke 22:36.
    "Followers of Christ, be armed."
  • dsmithdsmith Member Posts: 902 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I've heard countless liberals argue that police should be the only ones who should be allowed to own machine guns. When I asked them if they should be required to protect individuals, they said that they are not there to protect everybody.

    Why do they deserve more defense than everybody else?

    Also, a lot of people mention "armor piercing" ammunition. Gotta protect the police after all, right? Suddenly the Demonazis are concerned with protecting police from super ammo and not concerned with the private citizens. The only reason that the Demonazis are concerned with protecting the police from average citizens is because they are worried about citizens shooting police when the average citizens become the target, (Hitler style).
  • gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Why do they deserve more defense than everybody else?


    They don't. Somehow, I think we all already know that, though.

    They are just citizens. To give them a selection of weaponry not readily available to the rest of us is evil incarnate, as it removes the precept that we stand equal in the eyes of the law. Clearly, that is not the case.

    Death to Tyrants!!!
    Lev 26:14-39

    Those who would offer any interpretation that would relegate Amendment II to "relic" status of a bygone era are blatantly stating that the remainder of the Bill of Rights isn't worth a damn, either.

    Luke 22:36.
    "Followers of Christ, be armed."
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by gunphreak
    Ok, Fox, you know why as well as I do. There isn't a single so-called "antigun" politician on any level that is truly antigun.

    They are selectively pro-gun and by that, it means that only agents of the state have proper justification to own and use a weapon for self defense, because in their mind's eye, they are just too important to become a victim. That doesn't apply to any of us.

    Only regular people could be so stupid. Politicians are not. They may sound stupid to those of us who know better, but to those who don't know better, they accept whatever they are told by those they stupidly trust as their leaders.

    There is a huge lack of integrity involved here, and every single one of them are traitors.



    I clearly understand why the hypocritical politicians do what they do.

    What I meant was that I don't understand why we pro-gun people aren't able (or willing?) to beat them over the head with their hypocrisy each and every time we get a chance.

    Believe me, if I came across as a hypocrite here on GB.com (for just one example) I would justifiable catch he!! and probably be run off.

    Why don't we treat the hypocritical politicians the same way?

    Quote "Somehow government decided that the Constitutional Bill of Rights has become the Bill of "Suggested" Rights and are to be rationed to the citizens as the power elite sees fit"
  • HighballHighball Member Posts: 15,755
    edited November -1
    Politicians are protected species.They are protected by the news media,the elites,and big business.

    Just as long as they promote Constitution busting,freedom destroying,increase the power to the top dog legislation.

    Let them step across the line...and all the above combine to destroy the errant fool.....witness the continual attacks on Ron Paul..quite possibly the only politician that understands the Constitution.

    The common citizen is too stupid to understand the assault he personally is under.
Sign In or Register to comment.