In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

Brazilians Block Gun Ban

FitzFitz Member Posts: 258 ✭✭✭
From FoxNews.com: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,173154,00.html
quote:Brazilians Block Gun Ban
Sunday, October 23, 2005

RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil - Brazilians soundly rejected a proposal to ban the sale of guns in a national referendum Sunday, striking down the bid to stem one of the world's highest firearm murder rates following a campaign that drew parallels to the U.S. gun control debate.

Brazil (search) has 100 million fewer citizens than the United States (search), but a staggering 25 percent more gun deaths at nearly 40,000 a year. While supporters argued that gun control was the best way to staunch the violence, opponents played on Brazilians' fears that the police can't protect them.

"I don't like people walking around armed on the street. But since all the bandits have guns, you need to have a gun at home," said taxi driver Mohammed Osei, who voted against the ban.

With more than 92 percent of the votes counted, 64 percent of Brazilians were opposed to the ban, while 36 percent backed it, said election officials, giving the 'no' position an insurmountable lead.

The proposal would have prohibited the sale of firearms and ammunition except for police, the military, some security guards, gun collectors and sports shooters. It would complement a 2003 disarmament law that sharply restricts who can legally purchase firearms and carry guns in the street.

That law, coupled with a government-sponsored gun buyback program, has reduced deaths from firearms by about 8 percent this year, the Health Ministry said.

But the referendum backfired for proponents. Earlier this year, support for the ban was running as high as 80 percent. But in the weeks before the referendum, both sides were granted free time to present their cases on prime-time TV, and the pro-gun lobby began to grow.

Analysts said the pro-gun lobby benefited from equal time on television in the final weeks of the campaign and that they cannily cashed in on Brazilian skepticism of the police.

"They ask the question: 'Do you feel protected and do you think the government is protecting you?' and the answer is a violent no," said political scientist David Fleischer of the University of Brasilia.

The combination of Brazil's high gun-death rate and the nature of the debate over the right to gun ownership has drawn parallels to the gun debate in the United States.

"The whole campaign (against the ban) was imported from the United States. They just translated a lot of material from the NRA," said Jessica Galeria, a Californian who researches gun violence with the Viva Rio think tank, referring to the National Rifle Association (search). "Now, a lot of Brazilians are insisting on their right to bear arms, they don't even have a pseudo right to bear arms. It's not in their Constitution."

NRA public affairs director Andrew Arulanandam called the proposal's defeat "a victory for freedom."

"It's a stunning defeat for the global gun control movement. They poured millions of dollars and millions more man hours trying to enact this gun ban and they failed. The aim of this gun ban movement was to use Brazil as the rallying point to enact gun bans in the United States. We're happy they were defeated," he said.

Some Brazilians said they resented the referendum because they feel the government is ducking its responsibility to keep the peace.

"It's immoral for the government to have this vote," said Pedro Ricardo, an army officer in Sao Paulo. "They're putting the responsibility on us, but ... the way to cut down on violence is to combat the drug trade and patrol our borders."

Supporters maintain the referendum is the only way to make Brazil safer.

"We have to change the violence in this country," said Paulo Leite, an engineer from the upscale Ipanema beach district.

About 39,000 people in Brazil are killed by guns each year, compared to about 30,000 people in the United States, although the U.S. population is about 100 million more than Brazil's, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

According to UNESCO, Brazil ranks second in deaths by guns, with 21.72 per 100,000 people a year. Venezuela has 34.3 gun deaths per 100,000.

But in shantytowns like Vila do Joao, the rate rises to around 150 per 100,000. And for males between 17 and 24, the death rate is closer to 250 per 100,000.



Fitz

Comments

  • Options
    pickenuppickenup Member Posts: 22,844 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    At least they got to vote on the issue.
    WTG Brazil.

    And just for Mr, F
    Looks like the NRA "unintentionally" did some good. [;)]


    The gene pool needs chlorine.
  • Options
    HighballHighball Member Posts: 15,755
    edited November -1
    THANK YOU so much for this post. I knew the election was this month..but had let it slip my mind.

    BRAVoooo...for a people not totally dominated by fear and elites.
  • Options
    Rack OpsRack Ops Member Posts: 18,597 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Fitz
    From FoxNews.com: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,173154,00.html
    "The whole campaign (against the ban) was imported from the United States. They just translated a lot of material from the NRA," said Jessica Galeria, a Californian who researches gun violence with the Viva Rio think tank, referring to the National Rifle Association (search). "Now, a lot of Brazilians are insisting on their right to bear arms, they don't even have a pseudo right to bear arms. It's not in their Constitution."


    It's nice to know that she thinks that it is only a "pseudo" right to begin with......

    animated_usa_flag.gifanimated_rebel_flag.gif

    Molon Labe
  • Options
    FitzFitz Member Posts: 258 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Even the author's first sentence reveals the bias...
    quote:Brazilians soundly rejected a proposal to ban the sale of guns in a national referendum Sunday, striking down the bid to stem one of the world's highest firearm murder rates following a campaign that drew parallels to the U.S. gun control debate.
    (Emphasis added)

    It just goes to show that the facts demonstating that gun control causes higher murder rates are equally ignored at Fox News.

    Fitz
  • Options
    DefenderDefender Member Posts: 1,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Those bloodthirsty Brazilions!

    Maybe they should try and make gun rights part of their Constitution while they still can. That sends a loud message to the entire world. Are you listening, SAN FRANCISCO???

    Defender
    Private investigator licensed in AZ & CA that specializes in self defense cases.
  • Options
    ComengetitComengetit Member Posts: 1,170 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:That law, coupled with a government-sponsored gun buyback program, has reduced deaths from firearms by about 8 percent this year, the Health Ministry said.

    But the referendum backfired for proponents. Earlier this year, support for the ban was running as high as 80 percent. But in the weeks before the referendum, both sides were granted free time to present their cases on prime-time TV, and the pro-gun lobby began to grow.

    Analysts said the pro-gun lobby benefited from equal time on television in the final weeks of the campaign and that they cannily cashed in on Brazilian skepticism of the police.

    Well I guess that pretty much takes care of any possibility of us sharing the same RIGHTS TO FREE SPEECH. Now that they've seen the results. And now that I think of it, why don't we vote on laws?


    quote:quote:
    Originally posted by Fitz

    From FoxNews.com: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,173154,00.html
    "The whole campaign (against the ban) was imported from the United States. They just translated a lot of material from the NRA," said Jessica Galeria, a Californian who researches gun violence with the Viva Rio think tank, referring to the National Rifle Association (search). "Now, a lot of Brazilians are insisting on their right to bear arms, they don't even have a pseudo right to bear arms. It's not in their Constitution."




    It's nice to know that she thinks that it is only a "pseudo" right to begin with......


    "They ask the question: 'Do you feel protected and do you think the government is protecting you?' and the answer is a violent no," said political scientist David Fleischer of the University of Brasilia.


    You took the words right out of my mouth...


    Neo-Jedi Council
    th_rebspin.gif
    Naboo Sniper
    o3.gif

    There are two kinds of people in this World....Those who lead....and those who get the hell out of the way...GUT CHECK!...Which one are you?
  • Options
    Mr.PissyPantsMr.PissyPants Member Posts: 3,575
    edited November -1
    Way to go Brazil!

    Neo-Jedi Order
    th_reblogo.gif
    Candidate
  • Options
    codenamepaulcodenamepaul Member Posts: 2,931
    edited November -1
    Also part of the problem is the implication that the right to defend oneself or throw off the chains of tyranny(i.e. bear arms) has to be in the constitution (ours or any other) for it to be legitimate. Our mention of it in the Constitution merely affirms the right. It does not grant it. It is understood to be there.

    When the meekest of men raise their fist at you in defiance, you have lost. It is just a matter then of admitting it to yourself.
  • Options
    FitzFitz Member Posts: 258 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Codenamepaul, I couldn't agree more. Your point is EXACTLY what needs to be marketed with the seriousness that the Left markets Socialist ideas.

    Fitz
  • Options
    65gto38965gto389 Member Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    VIVA taurus firearms!










    " Those who give up a little freedom for temporary security, deserve neither freedom nor security "
    - Benjamin Franklin
Sign In or Register to comment.