In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

America the Fascist State ?

HighballHighball Member Posts: 15,755
This was posted over to GD to squash me like a bug..attempting to prove that we do NOT live in Fascism.
Well...I would be interested in intelligent comments on this list. How many do you believe are alive and well in America today.Do you see NONE of the characteristics around you..?

How many do you suppose would have to exist before we would have to concede.."We Have It"....and think about where gun priviliges play into this scnerio.





Fourteen Defining
Characteristics Of Fascism
By Dr. Lawrence Britt
Source Free Inquiry.co
5-28-3


Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each:

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread
domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.

6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

7. Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.

9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

10. Labor Power is Suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.

11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.

12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

From Liberty Forum

Comments

  • KYfatboyKYfatboy Member Posts: 859 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Very good info their highball, hope you don't mind, I borrowed this to post at my other site as well.
  • Red223Red223 Member Posts: 7,946
    edited November -1
    There is no Nationalism in America nor is there an obsession with National Security.

    We have hundreds of thousands of illegals entering/leaving the country every week. There is no security.

    Nationalism...nonexistent. The people in the Senate are allowing terrorists that rob, rape, and pillage America to become citizens merely for a few votes and to get the big money from Corporations.

    Americans do not hold the Senate accountable for selling the country out an not serving the American people whom gave them their jobs.


    Support the Troops!
    Revoke their entitlements, retirements, and healthcare benefits. Hire BlackwaterUSA (mercenaries) to peform their roles. Fire GI's and hire contractors to perform military base security. Screw those Federal Regulations that say 'guard' are reserved jobs for veterans. American's say one thing and support another.

    There will be no 20 year retirement from the US Armed Forces within the next 5 years. Fact.

    http://www.ussvi.org/veterans/vet-2006/060319l.htm
  • dsmithdsmith Member Posts: 902 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    We don't match all of the points yet. At most 8 or 9.

    However, I was disturbed by the the other article on the NRA/Brady campaign favored law being supported by Bush (formerly known as "Project Exile", or "Project Gestapo" like the GOA likes to call it)[xx(]
  • warriorsfanwarriorsfan Member Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Top 10 Signs of the Impending U.S. Police State

    Allan Uthman, Buffalo Beast. | May 26 2006

    Is the U.S. becoming a police state? Here are the top 10 signs that it may well be the case.

    1. The Internet Clampdown

    One saving grace of alternative media in this age of unfettered corporate conglomeration has been the internet. While the masses are spoon-fed predigested news on TV and in mainstream print publications, the truth-seeking individual still has access to a broad array of investigative reporting and political opinion via the world-wide web. Of course, it was only a matter of time before the government moved to patch up this crack in the sky.

    Attempts to regulate and filter internet content are intensifying lately, coming both from telecommunications corporations (who are gearing up to pass legislation transferring ownership and regulation of the internet to themselves), and the Pentagon (which issued an "Information Operations Roadmap" in 2003, signed by Donald Rumsfeld, which outlines tactics such as network attacks and acknowledges, without suggesting a remedy, that US propaganda planted in other countries has easily found its way to Americans via the internet). One obvious tactic clearing the way for stifling regulation of internet content is the growing media frenzy over child pornography and "internet predators," which will surely lead to legislation that by far exceeds in its purview what is needed to fight such threats.

    2. "The Long War"

    This little piece of clumsy marketing died off quickly, but it gave away what many already suspected: the War on Terror will never end, nor is it meant to end. It is designed to be perpetual. As with the War on Drugs, it outlines a goal that can never be fully attained -- as long as there are pissed off people and explosives. The Long War will eternally justify what are ostensibly temporary measures: suspension of civil liberties, military expansion, domestic spying, massive deficit spending and the like. This short-lived moniker told us all, "get used to it. Things aren't going to change any time soon."

    3. The USA PATRIOT Act

    Did anyone really think this was going to be temporary? Yes, this disgusting power grab gives the government the right to sneak into your house, look through all your stuff and not tell you about it for weeks on a rubber stamp warrant. Yes, they can look at your medical records and library selections. Yes, they can pass along any information they find without probable cause for purposes of prosecution. No, they're not going to take it back, ever.

    4. Prison Camps

    This last January the Army Corps of Engineers gave Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root nearly $400 million to build detention centers in the United States, for the purpose of unspecified "new programs." Of course, the obvious first guess would be that these new programs might involve rounding up Muslims or political dissenters -- I mean, obviously detention facilities are there to hold somebody. I wish I had more to tell you about this, but it's, you know... secret.

    5. Touchscreen Voting Machines

    Despite clear, copious evidence that these nefarious contraptions are built to be tampered with, they continue to spread and dominate the voting landscape, thanks to Bush's "Help America Vote Act," the exploitation of corrupt elections officials, and the general public's enduring cluelessness.

    In Utah, Emery County Elections Director Bruce Funk witnessed security testing by an outside firm on Diebold voting machines which showed them to be a security risk. But his warnings fell on deaf ears. Instead Diebold attorneys were flown to Emery County on the governor's airplane to squelch the story. Funk was fired. In Florida, Leon County Supervisor of Elections Ion Sancho discovered an alarming security flaw in their Diebold system at the end of last year. Rather than fix the flaw, Diebold refused to fulfill its contract. Both of the other two touchscreen voting machine vendors, Sequoia and ES&S, now refuse to do business with Sancho, who is required by HAVA to implement a touchscreen system and will be sued by his own state if he doesn't. Diebold is said to be pressuring for Sancho's ouster before it will resume servicing the county.

    Stories like these and much worse abound, and yet TV news outlets have done less coverage of the new era of elections fraud than even 9/11 conspiracy theories. This is possibly the most important story of this century, but nobody seems to give a damn. As long as this issue is ignored, real American democracy will remain an illusion. The midterm elections will be an interesting test of the public's continuing gullibility about voting integrity, especially if the Democrats don't win substantial gains, as they almost surely will if everything is kosher.

    Bush just suggested that his brother Jeb would make a good president. We really need to fix this problem soon.

    6. Signing Statements

    Bush has famously never vetoed a bill. This is because he prefers to simply nullify laws he doesn't like with "signing statements." Bush has issued over 700 such statements, twice as many as all previous presidents combined. A few examples of recently passed laws and their corresponding dismissals, courtesy of the Boston Globe:


    --Dec. 30, 2005: US interrogators cannot torture prisoners or otherwise subject them to cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.


    Bush's signing statement: The president, as commander in chief, can waive the torture ban if he decides that harsh interrogation techniques will assist in preventing terrorist attacks.


    --Dec. 30, 2005: When requested, scientific information ''prepared by government researchers and scientists shall be transmitted [to Congress] uncensored and without delay."


    Bush's signing statement: The president can tell researchers to withhold any information from Congress if he decides its disclosure could impair foreign relations, national security, or the workings of the executive branch.


    --Dec. 23, 2004: Forbids US troops in Colombia from participating in any combat against rebels, except in cases of self-defense. Caps the number of US troops allowed in Colombia at 800.


    Bush's signing statement: Only the president, as commander in chief, can place restrictions on the use of US armed forces, so the executive branch will construe the law ''as advisory in nature."

    Essentially, this administration is bypassing the judiciary and deciding for itself whether laws are constitutional or not. Somehow, I don't see the new Supreme Court lineup having much of a problem with that, though. So no matter what laws congress passes, Bush will simply choose to ignore the ones he doesn't care for. It's much quieter than a veto, and can't be overridden by a two-thirds majority. It's also totally absurd.

    7. Warrantless Wiretapping

    Amazingly, the GOP sees this issue as a plus for them. How can this be? What are you, stupid? You find out the government is listening to the phone calls of US citizens, without even the weakest of judicial oversight and you think that's okay? Come on -- if you know anything about history, you know that no government can be trusted to handle something like this responsibly. One day they're listening for Osama, and the next they're listening in on Howard Dean.

    Think about it: this administration hates unauthorized leaks. With no judicial oversight, why on earth wouldn't they eavesdrop on, say, Seymour Hersh, to figure out who's spilling the beans? It's a no-brainer. Speaking of which, it bears repeating: terrorists already knew we would try to spy on them. They don't care if we have a warrant or not. But you should.

    8. Free Speech Zones

    I know it's old news, but... come on, are they f'ing serious?

    9. High-ranking Whistleblowers

    Army Generals. Top-level CIA officials. NSA operatives. White House cabinet members. These are the kind of people that Republicans fantasize about being, and whose judgment they usually respect. But for some reason, when these people resign in protest and criticize the Bush administration en masse, they are cast as traitorous, anti-American publicity hounds. Ridiculous. The fact is, when people who kill, spy and deceive for a living tell you that the White House has gone too far, you had damn well better pay attention. We all know most of these people are staunch Republicans. If the entire military except for the two guys the Pentagon put in front of the press wants Rumsfeld out, why on earth wouldn't you listen?

    10. The CIA Shakeup

    Was Porter Goss fired because he was resisting the efforts of Rumsfeld or Negroponte? No. These appointments all come from the same guys, and they wouldn't be nominated if they weren't on board all the way. Goss was probably canned so abruptly due to a scandal involving a crooked defense contractor, his hand-picked third-in-command, the Watergate hotel and some hookers.

    If Bush's nominee for CIA chief, Air Force General Michael Hayden, is confirmed, that will put every spy program in Washington under military control. Hayden, who oversaw the NSA warrantless wiretapping program and is clearly down with the program. That program? To weaken and dismantle or at least neuter the CIA. Despite its best efforts to blame the CIA for "intelligence errors" leading to the Iraq war, the picture has clearly emerged -- through extensive CIA leaks -- that the White House's analysis of Saddam's destructive capacity was not shared by the Agency. This has proved to be a real pain in the * for Bush and the gang.

    Who'd have thought that career spooks would have moral qualms about deceiving the American people? And what is a president to do about it? Simple: make the critical agents leave, and fill their slots with Bush/Cheney loyalists. Then again, why not simply replace the entire organization? That is essentially what both Rumsfeld at the DoD and newly minted Director of National Intelligence John are doing -- they want to move intelligence analysis into the hands of people that they can control, so the next time they lie about an "imminent threat" nobody's going to tell. And the press is applauding the move as a "necessary reform."
  • Slow_HandSlow_Hand Member Posts: 2,835
    edited November -1
    When I originally offered Britt's 14 points in my rebuttal to being labelled a Fascist, it was with the following caveat or disclaimer:

    quote:It may be of interest to some - surely not all - to note that depending upon what you read and who wrote it, the defining aspects of fascism different widely from what many hear once and then repeat as fact throughout their lifetime.

    I offer the following only for your parousal and thought. Discard it if you wish.

    Here is an excerpt from an article originally published 12/07/2004 in which Ron Netsky, a staff reporter with City Newspaper recounts his interview of Britt about his book and the 14 points he listed. Here is Netsky's observation:

    At the end of Fascism Anyone?, after outlining his 14 points, Britt writes: "Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a constitution, a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not."
  • kyplumberkyplumber Member Posts: 11,111
    edited November -1
    I personally think we are closer to communism than fascism; But hey at least we agree that freedom has been poop upon.
    [B)]
  • pickenuppickenup Member Posts: 22,844 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Slow_Hand
    "Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a constitution, a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not."
    There are times that I like satirical humor.
  • Slow_HandSlow_Hand Member Posts: 2,835
    edited November -1
    Ironically, there's been doubt cast on Britt's 14 points since he first published them in 2003. Many contend that it's basically just very well-phrased and updated propaganda. However, there are others who do see where similarities exist but not across all 14 of Britt's points.

    Also, near as anyone can figure, he's just Lawrence Britt and not a "Doctor" as in "PhD". He's had quite a long and distinguished corporate career, working for some very, very large ones at that, so some question his sincerity on the subject itself.

    Lastly, the only reference on the web to Mr. Britt is the article on his 14 points! He apparently has nothing else to his credit - at least that can be searched for. Interesting.

    No matter, many political scientists, analysts, pundits, etc. apparently see it as being mostly "spin", but like everything else we read and hear, one should take it with a very large grain of salt - or not.
  • HighballHighball Member Posts: 15,755
    edited November -1
    History does not follow exactly the same path as great nations vanish.
    The illusion of freedom for the masses was most pronouced for Americans...we came oh-so-close to it. The reality of the matter is that the Elites have always controlled nearly everything..they just ruled with a looser grip then most tyrants.

    We perhaps need new words to describe what is taking place in America..where a combination of Socialism and Fascism is steadily weakening what little backbone remains in a small percentage of people...

    Just imagine the Senate leaders..all supporting and voting for the Patriot Act...giving the government carte blanc to enter your home, business, mail, bank...in short, your entire life...absolutely going NUTS over a dirty slimy bribe-taking congresspersons capital office being raided by FBI agents...proclaiming themselves to be "Off-Limits" to such 'high-handed tactics of intimidation"...said slimy perp ignoring 5 months of demands by the FBI to turn over all documents related to the case.....
    Then imagine the little 'Home Security President' sealing all documents for 45 days...

    Don't imagine it any more..turn on the news and listen a bit.
    I don't care WHAT you choose to call it...we are in desperate trouble here in America.
  • kyplumberkyplumber Member Posts: 11,111
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Highball
    we are in desperate trouble here in America.


    I know.. So do the cops.. so do the fed.. so does the exec branch. They are desperatly trying to hide it from hairy; And they are doing mighty well...
  • gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

    One day, this will be the calling card of the American Resistance...

    quote:5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.

    Not in this country. Actually, it seems like it would be quite the opposite.

    quote:11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.

    But only if it goes against their desires....
Sign In or Register to comment.