In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

110th Congress - 1st Session

pickenuppickenup Member Posts: 22,844 ✭✭✭✭
They have started already.
Fasten your seat belts, we are in for a bumpy ride.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-96

Comments

  • dsmithdsmith Member Posts: 902 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Didn't the Demonkrats promise that they would change their ways? Aren't they supposed to be more conservative than the Republikans now?

    Things never change, do they?
  • gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dsmith
    Didn't the Demonkrats promise that they would change their ways? Aren't they supposed to be more conservative than the Republikans now?

    Things never change, do they?


    Surprised?? (I doubt it...)
  • dsmithdsmith Member Posts: 902 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Demonkrats being anti-gun will never surprise me. It is a little bit interesting however, after the 2000 election the MSM said that guns were no longer a major political issue since they caused Al Gore's defeat. Couldn't be the MSM trying to help the Demos could it?
  • gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    When can you tell when a Demonkrat (or many republikans, for that matter) is lying to you?

    His lips are moving.
  • dsmithdsmith Member Posts: 902 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    gunphreak, as cliche as your saying may be, you are exactly right.
  • dsmithdsmith Member Posts: 902 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    gunphreak, I just broke out my Bible and looked up the Chapters and verses you cite in your signature. I understand the Luke 22:36 one, but where were you going with the Leviticus reference. The Leviticus one refers to what God would do to the Israelities if they betrayed his covenant. How does this destruction apply to government/gun related policies?
  • warriorsfanwarriorsfan Member Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dsmith
    Didn't the Demonkrats promise that they would change their ways? Aren't they supposed to be more conservative than the Republikans now?

    Things never change, do they?


    According to that text of that House Bill, it was introduced by Representatives Michael Castle of Delaware, Christopher Shays of Conneticut, and Mark Kirk of Illinois. All three of these Congressmen are REPUBLICANS.

    Sorry folks, you can thank the GOP for this one, the Democrats had nothing to do with it.
  • dsmithdsmith Member Posts: 902 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Wow. The Demonkrats have allies in the Republikans. Who'd have thunk? Well anyway, most of us know that most Republikans aren't pro-gun anyway. [V]
  • gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dsmith
    gunphreak, I just broke out my Bible and looked up the Chapters and verses you cite in your signature. I understand the Luke 22:36 one, but where were you going with the Leviticus reference. The Leviticus one refers to what God would do to the Israelities if they betrayed his covenant. How does this destruction apply to government/gun related policies?


    Is it unreasonable to believe God will do the same to the gentiles? If you believe otherwise, consider that our country is falling apart because we do not follow His Word as we should.
  • dsmithdsmith Member Posts: 902 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by gunphreak

    Is it unreasonable to believe God will do the same to the gentiles? If you believe otherwise, consider that our country is falling apart because we do not follow His Word as we should.


    Not unreasonable at all. But that would mean that the quote isn't related to government/guns. It's just related to not following God's law.
  • WoundedWolfWoundedWolf Member Posts: 1,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
  • gunphreakgunphreak Member Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dsmith
    quote:Originally posted by gunphreak

    Is it unreasonable to believe God will do the same to the gentiles? If you believe otherwise, consider that our country is falling apart because we do not follow His Word as we should.


    Not unreasonable at all. But that would mean that the quote isn't related to government/guns. It's just related to not following God's law.


    That's correct.

    Maybe I should have put a space between "Death to Tyrants" and the Leviticus verse I quoted. the two were not meant to be for the same topic.
  • dsmithdsmith Member Posts: 902 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by gunphreak
    quote:Originally posted by dsmith
    quote:Originally posted by gunphreak

    Is it unreasonable to believe God will do the same to the gentiles? If you believe otherwise, consider that our country is falling apart because we do not follow His Word as we should.


    Not unreasonable at all. But that would mean that the quote isn't related to government/guns. It's just related to not following God's law.


    That's correct.

    Maybe I should have put a space between "Death to Tyrants" and the Leviticus verse I quoted. the two were not meant to be for the same topic.


    Ok. Just making sure.
  • ObiWanObiWan Member Posts: 1,054 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Gunbroker would have to get one of them new special licenses and conduct nics checks on all sellers and buyers.

    The death of Gunbroker is it??
  • Wagon WheelWagon Wheel Member Posts: 633 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The Demo Gods Are Launching New Attacks At On Our 2nd Amendment Rights. This thread has already mentioned H.R. 96. I only include it to correct an erroneous statement that claimed all guilty parties are Republicans. Don't confuse Republican KEVIN McCarthy (CA) with Carolyn of (NY) There is no comparison.

    H.R.96( http://tinyurl.com/2m8vmr ) Castle, Michael Republican (DE)
    Co-Sponsored By: Kirk, Mark Republican (IL)
    Shays Chris Republican (CT)
    McCarthy Carolyn Democrat NY)

    H.R.297( http://tinyurl.com/2q88lf ). McCarthy,Carolyn Democrat (NY)
    Co-Sponsored By Dingell, John Democrat (Mi)

    H.R. 256 ( http://tinyurl.com/3brx43 ) Jackson-Lee Democrat (TX)

    H.R. 428 ( http://tinyurl.com/38k7mk ) Towns, Democrat (NY)

    Do away with toy Guns or any facsimiles thereof, raise the age limit to purchase firearms to 21, but draft at 18 and send them to war? Are these people for real? All these bills have been passed to committee. They used to die there. Now, these committees are chaired by Democrats.
  • Wagon WheelWagon Wheel Member Posts: 633 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    1st Amendment Rights Under Attack Again!!

    Democrats aren't wasting much time in rolling back free speech now that they have the majority. Few people really know where Senator Clinton stands on the most important issue of the day. Her positions change, at times daily, depending on the prevailing political winds at the time. Hillary does not want to risk too much probing by the media into her past misdeeds or her current untruths and inconsistencies. Now that Hillary Clinton has declared that she's running for president, we can expect that Democrats will move FAST and STRONG to bring back the "Fairness Doctrine". (It's in the works.)
    AKA: "Media Ownership Reform Act," (H.R. 4069)
    Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) ( the only open socialist in Congress) , Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), and Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) are the guilty parties here.
    (Kucinich is in charge of domestic policy reform.)

    This "Bill" is supported by George Soros, MoveOn.org and The Revolutionary Communist Party. They want to bring back the "Fairness Doctrine" -- this time, as a law.

    EVERY SINGLE REPRESENTATIVE AND SENATOR in Washington, D.C. needs to hear from us NOW, before they're able to sneak their legislation past an unsuspecting American public!

    GovTrack: H.R. 4069[108]: Media Ownership Reform Act of 2004
    A bill in US Congress: To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent excessive concentration of ownership of the nation's media outlets, ... www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h108-4069 - 15k -Cached - Similar pages

    I've E-mailed Both of my Senators and Both Reps. (My zip code is split so I blast both of them. They don't seem to know the difference.) Won't you do likewise??

    Read all about it;
    http://www.aim.org/special_report/5160_0_8_0_C/
    http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26540
Sign In or Register to comment.