In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

Reloading 7.62x39

Is there any real need for this or should i start doing this, if I should, should i get a progressive press, i have a single stage now, but that seems to slow when i own an sks?

Comments

  • Options
    Montanapete1Montanapete1 Member Posts: 27 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Can't find any data in my nosler books, have a old speer I'm going to look in later. Any of you have a secret Military grade reloading formula you'd like to share? Thanks for your time. Pete
  • Options
    babunbabun Member Posts: 11,054 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
  • Options
    Montanapete1Montanapete1 Member Posts: 27 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Have you tried any of those loads? Thanks for the link. Pete
  • Options
    babunbabun Member Posts: 11,054 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Montanapete1
    Have you tried any of those loads? Thanks for the link. Pete


    I only reloaded the x39 for a friend that had a very strong bolt action gun. We tried to push the velocity up quite a bit with the 125 gr bullets.
    If you are using them in a semi-auto like a ak or sks, just about any of the mid to high end loads will work, BUT each gun is different. Work from the low end up, if you want to hotrod that cartridge.

    In a sks/ak, velocity and accuracy takes a second place to function and clean burning loads.
  • Options
    MobuckMobuck Member Posts: 13,793 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I've loaded some good ammo using AA1680. It's a faster burn rate than some recommended loads but functions fine in both AR and SKS rifles.
  • Options
    Pistollero1050Pistollero1050 Member Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    just reloaded a bunch of 7.62x39 for SKS. IMR 4227 28.5 grs, worked great.[;)]
  • Options
    Montanapete1Montanapete1 Member Posts: 27 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Pistollero1050
    just reloaded a bunch of 7.62x39 for SKS. IMR 4227 28.5 grs, worked great.[;)]


    Just sized them last night, I'll give this a try thanks. What size bullet did you use?
  • Options
    babunbabun Member Posts: 11,054 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If you go back to that chart and research on the web, you will find that 4227 is not a great powder for the x39. It must be loaded heavy to get the same velocity, and it produces higher cup pressures than other powders that send the bullets faster.

    The highest load of 4227 I've seen listed anywhere on reloading sites is about 26 grains.
    IF you are loading for a sks/ak the saving factor is the long free bore the para=military guns have.

    I hope the other posters don't take this the wrong way, BUT why would
    you START with a load posted here that is way over any listed in reloading charts.
    BE CAREFUL.

    read ALL of this...

    http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=6&f=42&t=256397
  • Options
    Montanapete1Montanapete1 Member Posts: 27 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thanks babun, I didn't notice that. Been trying to get all my brass Sized. Haven't spent time on the charge or bullet yet. More homework is needed on my part. My goal is to recreate a cheap accurate X39 that will cycle out of my AK without alot of jams. If it helps out I have a Poly tech AK. I like the Idea of using IMR powder, but will use what is best for the gun. also I am leaning toward the .311 speer bullet any thing I should know? Thanks again for your time. Pete
  • Options
    JustCJustC Member Posts: 16,056 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    you know what they say about load data from other folks,...always start low and work up looking for pressure indications. Rule of thumb......
  • Options
    babunbabun Member Posts: 11,054 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by JustC
    you know what they say about load data from other folks,...always start low and work up looking for pressure indications. Rule of thumb......


    +1000

    I will never list my loads on a forum. That's just the way I am.
    I am not standing next to you while you copy my loads.

    The 7.62 x 39 is among the most "dangerous" reload out there.
    I've seen "reloaders" work up hot loads with .308" bullets and then switch to .311". After explaining the potential pressure change, some still say, " but it was alright with the last batch".[:0][:0]
  • Options
    Montanapete1Montanapete1 Member Posts: 27 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:

    The 7.62 x 39 is among the most "dangerous" reload out there.



    Why do you say this? Is it the bullet size or the cartridge itself? Is this why finding Printed load data is harder? Thanks Pete
  • Options
    babunbabun Member Posts: 11,054 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The two things you noted. I've seen too many people use .308" bullets to reload the x39, which in it self is not dangerous, TILL you use .311" tips which will raise the pressures with the same load.
    And there is little info in books and charts for a round that is fired so much. Probably because mil. ammo from over seas is {was} so cheap.
  • Options
    steve4102steve4102 Member Posts: 186 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by babun
    The two things you noted. I've seen too many people use .308" bullets to reload the x39, which in it self is not dangerous, TILL you use .311" tips which will raise the pressures with the same load.
    And there is little info in books and charts for a round that is fired so much. Probably because mil. ammo from over seas is {was} so cheap.


    Maybe maybe not.

    Sierra has quite a bit of data for the 7.62x39. They have data for .308 bullet and for .311 bullets.

    Here is an example of some of their data.

    125gr SPT .308.................125gr SPT .311
    Powder, Max charge.............Powder, Max charge

    N-120, 24.4gr.................N-120, 25.0gr
    IMR 4227, 23gr................IMR 4227, 23gr
    N-130, 27.1gr.................N-130, 27.5gr
    AA-1680, 24.7gr...............AA-1680, 24.6gr
    H4198, 25.4gr.................H4198, 26.1gr
    AA-2015, 28.2gr...............AA-2015, 28.9gr
    R-7, 26.3gr...................R-7, 27gr
    Benchmark, 29.4gr.............Benchmark, 30.0gr
    H322, 28.8gr..................H322, 29gr

    I know this is only one source of data, but according to Sierra, starting out with a .308 bullet and switching over to a .311 bullet will reduce pressure, not increase it. Go figure.

    Anyhow, it's best to avoid all of these issues by following safe reloading practices and that is,
    Anytime you change a component you should drop the charge down and work back up. Those that don't could make loading any cartridge "dangerous" not just the x39 with it's different bullet diameters.
  • Options
    babunbabun Member Posts: 11,054 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    How do you determine that the .311 tips have less pressure?
    By the fact that the loads are heavier than the .308 tips??

    Do you have any pressure reading on those loads??

    Could it be that more powder is needed to push the fatter bullet down the bore, and sometimes a heavy powder load with a undersize tip will lead to fouling which increases pressures again??

    Please post more info.
  • Options
    steve4102steve4102 Member Posts: 186 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Take the Sierra data any way you wish.
    As Sierra does not list actual pressures we can only assume that all their loads were tested to run at the same or similar MAP. I know Assume makes an * of You and Me, sorry.

    If this assumption is correct then the .311 diameter bullet was able to utilize more powder producing higher velocity and still stay within the "Safe" pressure ranges of the x39.

    How ever you want to slice it, according to Sierra, switching from a .308 to a .311 will not cause a "dangerous" situation as posted earlier.
  • Options
    steve4102steve4102 Member Posts: 186 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    On the other hand, we can use a computer model to guesstimate pressures with different bullet diameters.
    Cartridge          : 7.62 x 39 (M43) Russ.
    Bullet             : .308, 125, Sierra SP 2120
    Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.190 inch or 55.63 mm
    Barrel Length      : 16.0 inch or 406.4 mm
    Powder             : Accurate 1680
    
    Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
    incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
    CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
    
    Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
     %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms
    
    -20.0   67    20.80   1790     889   23119   4674     80.1    1.215
    -18.0   69    21.32   1832     932   24502   4838     81.3    1.187
    -16.0   70    21.84   1875     976   25955   5001     82.6    1.160
    -14.0   72    22.36   1917    1020   27478   5163     83.8    1.133
    -12.0   74    22.88   1960    1066   29076   5323     84.9    1.107
    -10.0   75    23.40   2003    1113   30767   5482     86.1    1.082
    -08.0   77    23.92   2046    1161   32558   5637     87.2    1.064
    -06.0   79    24.44   2089    1211   34457   5790     88.2    1.037
    -04.0   80    24.96   2131    1261   36469   5940     89.3    1.011
    -02.0   82    25.48   2174    1312   38602   6086     90.3    0.985
    +00.0   84    26.00   2217    1365   40865   6229     91.2    0.960
    +02.0   85    26.52   2260    1418   43265   6367     92.1    0.936
    +04.0   87    27.04   2304    1473   45813   6501     93.0    0.912  ! Near Maximum !
    +06.0   89    27.56   2347    1528   48519   6629     93.8    0.889  ! Near Maximum !
    +08.0   90    28.08   2390    1585   51395   6753     94.5    0.867  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    +10.0   92    28.60   2433    1643   54454   6870     95.3    0.845  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    
    Results caused by ? 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
    Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
    +Ba     84    26.00   2337    1516   47982   6439     96.7    0.894  ! Near Maximum !
    Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
    -Ba     84    26.00   2073    1193   34051   5796     83.1    1.042
    

    Cartridge          : 7.62 x 39 (M43) Russ.
    Bullet             : .311, 125, Sierra SP 2305
    Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.190 inch or 55.63 mm
    Barrel Length      : 16.0 inch or 406.4 mm
    Powder             : Accurate 1680
    
    Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
    incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
    CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
    
    Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
     %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms
    
    -20.0   69    20.80   1807     906   23943   4669     80.5    1.200
    -18.0   70    21.32   1850     950   25405   4832     81.8    1.171
    -16.0   72    21.84   1893     995   26944   4994     83.0    1.144
    -14.0   74    22.36   1937    1041   28559   5154     84.2    1.131
    -12.0   76    22.88   1980    1088   30258   5313     85.4    1.102
    -10.0   77    23.40   2023    1136   32058   5469     86.5    1.073
    -08.0   79    23.92   2067    1186   33969   5622     87.6    1.046
    -06.0   81    24.44   2110    1236   35998   5773     88.7    1.019
    -04.0   82    24.96   2154    1288   38152   5920     89.7    0.992
    -02.0   84    25.48   2198    1341   40441   6063     90.7    0.966
    +00.0   86    26.00   2241    1394   42874   6202     91.6    0.941
    +02.0   88    26.52   2285    1449   45461   6337     92.5    0.917  ! Near Maximum !
    +04.0   89    27.04   2329    1506   48213   6466     93.4    0.893  ! Near Maximum !
    +06.0   91    27.56   2373    1563   51144   6591     94.2    0.871  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    +08.0   93    28.08   2417    1621   54267   6709     94.9    0.848  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    +10.0   94    28.60   2460    1680   57598   6821     95.6    0.827  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    
    Results caused by ? 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
    Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
    +Ba     86    26.00   2361    1547   50400   6394     97.0    0.876  ! Near Maximum !
    Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
    -Ba     86    26.00   2096    1220   35666   5785     83.6    1.022
    

    As you can see my this computer generated data the .311 bullet does produce higher pressure than the .308 bullet. But the pressure is minimal at about 2000psi. certainly not enough to turn a safe load into a "dangerous" load.
  • Options
    Montanapete1Montanapete1 Member Posts: 27 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Wow! Thanks Steve great data.
  • Options
    steve4102steve4102 Member Posts: 186 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Here is some more computer generated data. This is NOT tested data it is only to show how different powders perform in the x39. All data is untested and must be verified with printed tested data and manuals.
    Cartridge          : 7.62 x 39 (M43) Russ.
    Bullet             : .311, 125, Speer SP 2213
    Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.150 inch or 54.61 mm
    Barrel Length      : 24.0 inch or 609.6 mm
    
    Predicted Data for Indicated Charges of the Following Powders.
    
    Matching Maximum Pressure: 50000 psi, or 344 MPa
    
    or a maximum loading ratio or filling of 110 %
    
    These calculations refer to your specified settings in QuickLOAD 'Cartridge Dimensions' window.
    C A U T I O N : any load listed can result in a powder charge that falls below minimum suggested
    loads or exceeds maximum suggested loads as presented in current handloading manuals. Understand
    that all of the listed powders can be unsuitable for the given combination of cartridge, bullet
    and gun. Actual load order can vary, depending upon lot-to-lot powder and component variations.
    USE ONLY FOR COMPARISON !
    
    74 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 90%. These powders have been skipped.
    
    Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                          %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
    ---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
    SF-033 fl                          107.5     31.8     2.06    2699   100.0    50000    4474   1.118  ! Near Maximum !
    Nitrochemie A/S 0300               102.7     30.5     1.98    2687    98.8    50000    4648   1.117  ! Near Maximum !
    Alliant Reloder-10x                109.1     29.8     1.93    2649    98.8    50000    4504   1.135  ! Near Maximum !
    Norma 200                           99.4     29.8     1.93    2640    99.3    50000    4424   1.151  ! Near Maximum !
    Bofors RP1/NP ~approximation        99.4     29.8     1.93    2640    99.3    50000    4424   1.151  ! Near Maximum !
    Ramshot X-Terminator               102.5     31.8     2.06    2636    95.7    50000    4614   1.132  ! Near Maximum !
    SNPE Vectan SP 10                  104.6     32.4     2.10    2636    94.6    50000    4660   1.132  ! Near Maximum !
    PB Clermont PCL 508                104.5     32.4     2.10    2634    94.5    50000    4652   1.132  ! Near Maximum !
    ADI AR 2219                        104.3     31.2     2.02    2634    95.7    50000    4600   1.127  ! Near Maximum !
    Winchester 748                     110.0     34.3     2.22    2629    91.6    50000    4763   1.130  ! Near Maximum !
    Hodgdon H335                       104.7     33.1     2.14    2629    94.4    50000    4667   1.131  ! Near Maximum !
    ADI AR 2207                        102.7     27.8     1.80    2629   100.0    50000    4148   1.134  ! Near Maximum !
    SNPE Vectan Sp 7                   108.3     33.6     2.18    2619    92.6    50000    4629   1.145  ! Near Maximum !
    Somchem S321                       109.9     34.3     2.22    2618    91.4    50000    4706   1.137  ! Near Maximum !
    Hodgdon H322                       110.0     30.9     2.00    2610    95.3    48459    4566   1.141  ! Near Maximum !
    Ramshot TAC                        108.6     33.7     2.18    2610    91.0    50000    4649   1.137  ! Near Maximum !
    Accurate 2460                      109.4     34.0     2.20    2606    92.4    50000    4560   1.148  ! Near Maximum !
    Lovex-D0832                        109.8     33.5     2.17    2601    95.3    50000    4463   1.132  ! Near Maximum !
    Accurate 2015                      110.0     30.8     2.00    2601    97.8    48226    4400   1.158  ! Near Maximum !
    Alliant Reloder-12                 110.0     32.5     2.10    2596    95.6    49702    4449   1.139  ! Near Maximum !
    IMR 4198                           106.4     27.6     1.79    2596    99.3    50000    4134   1.130  ! Near Maximum !
    Vihtavuori N530                    110.0     32.0     2.08    2592    90.8    49229    4579   1.144  ! Near Maximum !
    Accurate 2230                      106.9     33.2     2.15    2586    92.2    50000    4456   1.148  ! Near Maximum !
    Alliant Reloder- 7                 100.9     28.3     1.83    2585    99.1    50000    4180   1.152  ! Near Maximum !
    Vihtavuori N120                    105.2     27.8     1.80    2584   100.0    50000    3826   1.140  ! Near Maximum !
    PB Clermont PCL 507                110.0     33.2     2.15    2568    90.0    47369    4578   1.162  ! Near Maximum !
    Kazan Sunar 308W                   105.1     29.8     1.93    2564    98.2    50000    4147   1.152  ! Near Maximum !
    ADI AR 2210                        104.0     31.1     2.01    2564    92.1    50000    4378   1.150  ! Near Maximum !
    Vihtavuori N130                    110.0     29.8     1.93    2563    98.3    48955    4169   1.156  ! Near Maximum !
    Accurate 2200                      100.7     29.6     1.92    2561    93.5    50000    4304   1.149  ! Near Maximum !
    Hodgdon H4227                       96.0     25.5     1.65    2560   100.0    50000    3852   1.140  ! Near Maximum !
    Norma 201                          110.0     32.6     2.11    2553    90.2    46892    4537   1.181  ! Near Maximum !
    ADI BM2                            101.4     31.3     2.03    2552    92.1    50000    4324   1.154  ! Near Maximum !
    Lovex-D0733                        104.8     32.3     2.10    2550    91.0    50000    4301   1.152  ! Near Maximum !
    Hodgdon Benchmark                  110.0     31.4     2.03    2546    91.8    49730    4312   1.157  ! Near Maximum !
    Hodgdon BL-C2                      110.0     34.8     2.25    2544    88.4    44582    4697   1.187  ! Near Maximum !
    Lovex-D0731                        104.6     32.3     2.09    2539    90.0    50000    4266   1.153  ! Near Maximum !
    IMR 4227                            94.7     25.1     1.63    2536    99.8    50000    3815   1.146  ! Near Maximum !
    Lovex-S0531                         96.8     25.1     1.63    2534   100.0    50000    3632   1.155  ! Near Maximum !
    Hodgdon H4198                      101.4     27.6     1.79    2528    95.3    50000    4034   1.152  ! Near Maximum !
    Rottweil R901                      110.0     30.3     1.96    2495    92.4    42571    4423   1.241
    ADI AR 2206H                       110.0     31.9     2.06    2495    88.7    49414    4138   1.169  ! Near Maximum !
    Somchem S341                       110.0     34.3     2.22    2477    85.8    45165    4297   1.197  ! Near Maximum !
    Vihtavuori N110                     90.9     22.3     1.45    2476   100.0    50000    3267   1.169  ! Near Maximum !
    ADI AR 2206                        110.0     31.5     2.04    2475    88.5    47352    4134   1.187  ! Near Maximum !
    Norma 202                          110.0     31.3     2.03    2475    91.6    40284    4426   1.236
    Somchem S265                        92.2     24.5     1.59    2470   100.0    50000    3434   1.178  ! Near Maximum !
    Lovex-S0601                        110.0     31.0     2.01    2458    87.3    45903    4127   1.202  ! Near Maximum !
    
Sign In or Register to comment.