In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options
Reloading 7.62x39
Montanapete1
Member Posts: 27 ✭✭
Is there any real need for this or should i start doing this, if I should, should i get a progressive press, i have a single stage now, but that seems to slow when i own an sks?
Comments
select "rifle"
select "7.62x39 russian"
Have you tried any of those loads? Thanks for the link. Pete
I only reloaded the x39 for a friend that had a very strong bolt action gun. We tried to push the velocity up quite a bit with the 125 gr bullets.
If you are using them in a semi-auto like a ak or sks, just about any of the mid to high end loads will work, BUT each gun is different. Work from the low end up, if you want to hotrod that cartridge.
In a sks/ak, velocity and accuracy takes a second place to function and clean burning loads.
just reloaded a bunch of 7.62x39 for SKS. IMR 4227 28.5 grs, worked great.[;)]
Just sized them last night, I'll give this a try thanks. What size bullet did you use?
The highest load of 4227 I've seen listed anywhere on reloading sites is about 26 grains.
IF you are loading for a sks/ak the saving factor is the long free bore the para=military guns have.
I hope the other posters don't take this the wrong way, BUT why would
you START with a load posted here that is way over any listed in reloading charts.
BE CAREFUL.
read ALL of this...
http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=6&f=42&t=256397
you know what they say about load data from other folks,...always start low and work up looking for pressure indications. Rule of thumb......
+1000
I will never list my loads on a forum. That's just the way I am.
I am not standing next to you while you copy my loads.
The 7.62 x 39 is among the most "dangerous" reload out there.
I've seen "reloaders" work up hot loads with .308" bullets and then switch to .311". After explaining the potential pressure change, some still say, " but it was alright with the last batch".[:0][:0]
The 7.62 x 39 is among the most "dangerous" reload out there.
Why do you say this? Is it the bullet size or the cartridge itself? Is this why finding Printed load data is harder? Thanks Pete
And there is little info in books and charts for a round that is fired so much. Probably because mil. ammo from over seas is {was} so cheap.
The two things you noted. I've seen too many people use .308" bullets to reload the x39, which in it self is not dangerous, TILL you use .311" tips which will raise the pressures with the same load.
And there is little info in books and charts for a round that is fired so much. Probably because mil. ammo from over seas is {was} so cheap.
Maybe maybe not.
Sierra has quite a bit of data for the 7.62x39. They have data for .308 bullet and for .311 bullets.
Here is an example of some of their data.
125gr SPT .308.................125gr SPT .311
Powder, Max charge.............Powder, Max charge
N-120, 24.4gr.................N-120, 25.0gr
IMR 4227, 23gr................IMR 4227, 23gr
N-130, 27.1gr.................N-130, 27.5gr
AA-1680, 24.7gr...............AA-1680, 24.6gr
H4198, 25.4gr.................H4198, 26.1gr
AA-2015, 28.2gr...............AA-2015, 28.9gr
R-7, 26.3gr...................R-7, 27gr
Benchmark, 29.4gr.............Benchmark, 30.0gr
H322, 28.8gr..................H322, 29gr
I know this is only one source of data, but according to Sierra, starting out with a .308 bullet and switching over to a .311 bullet will reduce pressure, not increase it. Go figure.
Anyhow, it's best to avoid all of these issues by following safe reloading practices and that is,
Anytime you change a component you should drop the charge down and work back up. Those that don't could make loading any cartridge "dangerous" not just the x39 with it's different bullet diameters.
By the fact that the loads are heavier than the .308 tips??
Do you have any pressure reading on those loads??
Could it be that more powder is needed to push the fatter bullet down the bore, and sometimes a heavy powder load with a undersize tip will lead to fouling which increases pressures again??
Please post more info.
As Sierra does not list actual pressures we can only assume that all their loads were tested to run at the same or similar MAP. I know Assume makes an * of You and Me, sorry.
If this assumption is correct then the .311 diameter bullet was able to utilize more powder producing higher velocity and still stay within the "Safe" pressure ranges of the x39.
How ever you want to slice it, according to Sierra, switching from a .308 to a .311 will not cause a "dangerous" situation as posted earlier.
As you can see my this computer generated data the .311 bullet does produce higher pressure than the .308 bullet. But the pressure is minimal at about 2000psi. certainly not enough to turn a safe load into a "dangerous" load.