In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
C.O.L. V I.V.
The Old Salt
Member Posts: 94 ✭✭
On a day with 85 deg F temps I fired several 10 rd groups and recorded the IVs. A month later I rfe-fired the same loads, same powder loads, primer, & case. There were only 2 differences. C.O.L. and temp. Temp was down 25 deg F to 60 deg F. Original day's group had C.O.L.s that attempted to keep the Ogive 0.010" off the rifling. The second day's groups were loaded w C.O.L.s long enough that the bullets were seated by contact w the rifling. The second day's groupings had I.V. 125 to 150 fps slower.
Why? Analysis invited.
Additional data to consider
Cal. 308, 168 SMK
H4895 loads from below to above max,
Win brass, Rem 9 1/2 primers,
24" custom barrel w 1"/10" twist
Why? Analysis invited.
Additional data to consider
Cal. 308, 168 SMK
H4895 loads from below to above max,
Win brass, Rem 9 1/2 primers,
24" custom barrel w 1"/10" twist
Comments
And, although the outside temperature was 25 degrees different, could or was the ammunition hotter than 85 degrees on the 1st day, like maybe sitting in the sun versus in the shade?
Chemical reaction are temperature sensitive. As kid I had winter loads, they were only shot out of a cold rifle.
How were the group sizes? 150 fps out of like 2700 isn't a lot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_ballistics
These bullets were hand selected out of 225 bullets. All the bullets were measured from the Ogive (0.297") to the bullet base & overall bullet length. From these measurements the Ogive to bullet nose length was determined. Even w 168g SMKs there is a variation of 0.010 in Ogive to nose length.
I selected bullets w similar Ogive to nose lengths to eliminate them as a source of variation.
Your response suggests you believe the IV difference can be associated w the powder temp difference. Seems like the delta in IV is too great for the delta in temps.
I was testing loads for their velocities. I was also fire forming new brass to my chamber.
You changed the internal ballistics in the round. The small jump in the chamber enough to do it. I'm going to guess that the standard deviation was less with the rounds loaded with the ogive on the rifling.