In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
7x61 SHARPE & HART
ENBLOC
Member Posts: 327 ✭✭
Just bought a Schultz & Larsen chambered for this cartridge. I have a part box of Norma 160 gr factory stuff I picked up at a gun show several years back. The original Norma loading was supposedly 160 gr @ 3100 fps!! I know Norma stuff is hot but that seems a little over the top. The 7mm Rem. Mag. is a bigger case and I have trouble getting 3100 FPS with a 140 without pushing the pressure envelope. I know there were 2 versions; the later one marked "Super". I seem to remember reading that the Super version was on a thinner case that held a little more powder to get higher velocity. I have cases for both versions but no empties of one version to weigh.
Anyway, anybody ever fooled around with this cartridge?
Anyway, anybody ever fooled around with this cartridge?
Comments
Candle soot black is better for marking bullets for seating depth than Sharpie black.
http://www.chuckhawks.com/7x61_SH_Mag.htm
MAYBE a one in ten, or even a one in nine.
I've loaded some rounds to try out using 120, 139, 154 grain bullets over 53 grains of H-380 using a standard large rifle primer. I had acquired some reloads and I pulled them down to see 63 grains of stick powder that looked like IMR-4350. The bullets here were 175 grain bronze tipped silver jacket spitzer that compressed the powder to the point I had to break it apart. The other re-load was 63 grains under a 162 grain spritzer. I reduced both of these hand loads to 56 grains each.
I really don't like compressed loads. I have also on hand besides H-380, IMR-4831, IMR-4350, IMR-4320, Reloader 22.
Is the 154 grain bullet over 62 grains of IMR-4350 near max? I've read that this cartridge was designed to work with IMR-4350.
My rifle is a Schultz & Larsen and has the early super-slow 1-14" twist (It is so marked on the barrel) and will not group decently with bullets longer than the 140 gr. Sierra flat base but it groups under an inch with that bullet and 67.5 gr. of H4831 and WLRM primer (velocity is 3143 fps). The 120 gr. Sierra flat base also shoots very well. I am using Norma "Super" cases.
In re-reading the above, it looks like I stated there were two different 7x61 Sharpe & Hart cartridges and that's NOT what I meant! The exterior dimensions of the "Super" and the "S&H" are the same and the cases are intended for the same rifle. The "Super" cases have greater internal capacity to allow for more powder and thereby get a little more velocity.
I have also re-formed cases from 7mm Rem Mag. & 270 Wby Mag. to try yet. If I anneal cases first the 7mm Rem Mag have less dents in shoulder. The 270 Wby Mag reform perfect. Both Rem. & Wby. are then trimmed to length. It appears the Weatherby Mag. cases are a smoother transition to become 7x61 S&H.
Ambrose,
good to know there are two different chamberings for this. I wonder if there were any European differences in Nomenclature that picked this up? I know many people here in the U.S. don't know there is a difference between .30-338 and .308 Norma. In fact, two reloading books I have write that they are the same. And, they are not! One could get away with putting a .30-338 in a .308 (vice-versa won't fit) and firing it, but you are trashing your throat. Not to mention the excess space the case has to fill takes up a lot of useful pressure and you don't get much velocity.