In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Loads for .222 & .223
Ambrose
Member Posts: 3,208 ✭✭✭✭
Recently I have been playing with a couple of 788 Remingtons in above chamberings and have discovered a few good loads. The .222 shoots very well with 50 Sierra and 23 gr. H322. Velocity averages 3133 fps. I don't get .25" 5-shot groups every time or "all day long" as some like to say, but often enough to keep it interesting. Six 5-shot groups averaged .43". I read somewhere that if 55 gr. bullets in a .222 are held to just below 3000 fps they shoot better. 55 gr. Sierra blitz with 19.7 gr. IMR4198 shoots very well.
The .223 likes 28 gr. W748 with 50 Nosler ballistic tips @ 3359 fps. Remington 55 gr. PLHP and 28.5 gr CFE223 work well, too, @ 3239 fps.
The .223 likes 28 gr. W748 with 50 Nosler ballistic tips @ 3359 fps. Remington 55 gr. PLHP and 28.5 gr CFE223 work well, too, @ 3239 fps.
Comments
4198 will teach you reloading penitence in a 222. I use a dipper to the scales pan, then a trickler followed by a long neck funnel. For the most part I use the 4198 in the 458 and 3031 in the 222.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.219_Zipper
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.219_Donaldson_Wasp
I've seen several calibers that would shoot a good warm bore group (especially 223's) but the cold bore groups were no good. The shooter has to do his part each time to do cold bore testing. (letting the barrel cool for at least 24 hrs between shots)
Try the cold bore testing.. It will test your patience, but when you find what the guns barrel really wants for good accuracy you will really like your gun and will probably sleep and cuddle with it and not let anyone else touch it.![;)]
I don't often find the time or patience to do proper cold bore testing but I agree that it's a great thing to do. Target work is fun, but when I have to take out one of my rifles for serious work; meat hunting, varmint control, etc., it's good to know exactly where that first shot is going to go. (And then the ones after!) ;-)
In the .223 I use 23.8 gr. behind a 68 Horn./69 SMK.
In my .223 rifles with a 5.56 chamber I use 25.3 gr. of RE-15 behind a 75/77 HPBT.
I've used your load of 22.8/AA2015/50 Sierra (I believe you're the one who recommended it to me) in nine different rifles and it shoots very well in most of them. 39 5-shot groups average 1.06". A couple of those rifles are a bit of a problem accuracy wise. The BSA for instance, while a beautiful rifle, is fussy. I haven't tried the 52 gr. Sierra yet but I'm taking 8 rifles to the range tomorrow, weather permitting, and I might get to it then.
My .223's are bolt actions and are, I believe, too slow twist (1-12) for the heavy, long bullets you shoot.
So many factors in superb accuracy that I can't mention how many times I've forgotten to double check. I rarely shoot flat foreend rifles as they don't translate so well off the bench as on. So, rolling is a problem. And the ever omnipresent parallax bug. You think you've gotten it just right, the view is 100% clear, but you're inside the scope....and you've moved[B)]. You have to find that original cheek weld where you can back out of the view then back in concentricly. So the black comes out and touches the scope edges evenly. No amount of parallax adjusting on the scope has ever gotten me "dead on". My eyes simply focus through the problem even though it exists. And the mechanics....oh the mechanics... Pulling shots, different shoulder placement/recoil movement, shark-eyeing, Big guns are the worst for me when it comes to mechanics.
But, you know it when you're "ON" and a rifle just isn't shooting as well as you can. I've heard both about BSA. Incredibly accurate to couldn't hit the side of a barn from the inside. Although the latter seems definitely shooter related...[;)]
In my Savage 12, 26 gr of BLC2 and a 50 gr Hornady polymer tip A-max will put every shot touching at 100 if I hold the gun steady on the bench.
Good to hear that BLC2 will work for someone.
I've tried BLC2 in several very accurate guns (guns that are very accurate with other powders) and still experimenting with BLC2 every chance I get and have yet to find a gun that likes BLC2 for good consistent accuracy. BLC2 and IMR4895 seems to be ok for firecrackers.
Have a 223 that loves H4895 but not IMR4895. I don't even test IMR4895 anymore because I can find other powders that will get consistent repeatable accurate results.
My experience with IMR4895 is it's not trustworthy, it will group good one day and not next. BLC2 just don't ever group good for any of my guns or me.[:(]