In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

Lyman manuals have me confused

hunter86004hunter86004 Member Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭✭✭
Brought this over from the cowboy action forum. Not much going on over there.

Ok, decided to reload a bunch of 45-70s for my trapdoor and looking at both the 46th and 49th editions, it suddenly became strange.

Using the same bullet mold, the 46th edition shows a bullet weight of 366gr. and the 49th edition has it at 385gr.

It got even better when I looked at the starting load for IMR3031 which I have quite a bit of. The 46th edition shows a start to max as 30-39 grains with a Dacron filler and the 49th edition shows a start to max of 40-44.5 grains with no filler.

Then, when I looked at the pressure for the max charge, in each book, the older book shows 17,000 cup with the lighter charge and 15,800 with the larger charge in the new book.

What is a fella to believe?

Comments

  • Options
    charliemeyer007charliemeyer007 Member Posts: 6,579 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I never liked nitro powder in a trapdoor.

    Powder's can/do change over time. Primer, case, and bullet type and weight make a difference. So does the manner of testing copper crusher or strain gage.

    Lyman has varied the weight of bullets with the same mold #'s over the years. 20 grains in 400 is what 5%
  • Options
    navc130navc130 Member Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think Lyman would be the proper source of information. If you get a reply from them, please let us know. Some powders have changed a little and pressure measuring equipment has also changed / improved.
    Added: Looks like they cannot give any info to the general public for legal / liability reasons. That is the name of the game in today's world.
  • Options
    hunter86004hunter86004 Member Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I sent an email to Lyman, so we'll see what they have to say.
  • Options
    Hawk CarseHawk Carse Member Posts: 4,369 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Bullet weights can vary as mold cherries wear and are replaced.
    Does #46 say No 2 alloy? #49 does and that is a standard formulation.

    When in doubt, I go to Ken Waters. He thought 38.5 gr IMR 3031 was right for a 383 gr cast .45-70. Note that this is on the high side for #46 and on the low end for #49. I would avoid non-gunpowder crap in my ammunition if I could.
  • Options
    hunter86004hunter86004 Member Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    "Bullet weights can vary as mold cherries wear and are replaced.
    Does #46 say No 2 alloy? #49 does and that is a standard formulation."

    The bullet in the old book was sized to .457 and the new book it's .458, but, assuming the same size mold is used, sizing does not change the bullet weight. Both mold numbers are the same. No alloy is listed in either book, but both were tested on a universal receiver.

    I guess my question is why a smaller diameter, and lighter, bullet over a lighter charge would create a greater pressure while a larger bullet over a larger charge would be less pressure. It doesn't sound right to me.
  • Options
    hunter86004hunter86004 Member Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well, heard from Lyman, but not the answer I was really looking for.

    Good morning Don,

    You should be using the most current load data for your application. Loads don?t stay the same over time, as even just 1 minor change to the recipe could completely change the results. We no longer recommend the use of ANY fillers for reloading. Please give us a call at 1-800-225-9626 if you need further assistance.

    Best Regards,

    Customer Service



    From: Lyman [mailto:customerservice@lymanproducts.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 1:04 AM
    To: Customer Ticket Mailbox
    Subject: Contact/Catalog Request Received
Sign In or Register to comment.