In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
41 mag
wtroper
Member Posts: 736 ✭✭
Out of curiousity -- anyone care to share their pet "41 mag" accuracy load. I am not a competitive shooter. But I hunt with a 41 mag. Even for hunting purposes, I am more concerned with the accurate load rather than the fastest one. Shoot S&W 657 (6 1/2 in), FA M83(7 1/2 in) and FA M97(7 1/2 in). I understand that the max loads that the FA 83 will take might be dangerous in the S&W & even the 97. Over the years I have spent some time working out loads for each of these. Just wondering if any one has done likewise.
Comments
I'd prefer using 2400. Blackhawk with 6.5 bbl.
I began to develop one for me. I found that my best accuracy was with a load a little under 1600. John was using 110 & 296 but my best accuracy was with Hercules 2400. That was about the time that Alliant replaced Hercules. Alliant 2400 did not do for me what the Hercules did. I purchased many lbs of Hercules before it was gone. Still have a good supply.
An aside -- my accuracy load for my S&W 657 is with Hercules Bluedot. Have a supply of that too. LOL 2400 will give me close to the Bluedot load, but not quite.
I selected the Remington for the S&W because it looks very different from the XTP. Thus, less likely that I will get the wrong one in a particular revolver.
Both the XTP & the Remington 210 have performed well on deer sized animals for me. Last Sept. took a blackbuck antelope (standing facing me) in the neck at 94 yds. Year before shot a fallow buck (also standing facing me) in the neck at 96 yds. My self imposed max with these revolvers is about 120 yds. Both with FA revolvers. My unofficially adopted grandson put a Remington from the 657 (in one side & out the other) through a corsican ram's heart @ 60 yds last year.
Good hunting & shooting.