In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
25-06 Ackley Improved reloads
Old 31
Member Posts: 10 ✭✭
My Father had this gun built on a Win. Model 70 action with a Blue Marlin barrel, in the 1950's & he never really shot it much or at all. Since his passing my son & I decided to get it out & use it. We tried factory Win. super X ammo with a 90gr. bullet just to form the case shoulders. To our suprise it shoots 5/8" groups @ 100 yds. just shooting out the shoulders with this ammo. We now are trying to work up a reload & can not get the bullet to fly true (punching oval holes & no good grouping). We are using a 100 gr, boatail bullet & have tried 4350 & 4832 podwers with various loads & still the same results. We are guessing it has a high twist rate but I don't know what it is. The gunsmith that built the rifle has also passed away. Any sugeestions?
Comments
if not, have you tried a lighter bullet?? you may have a slow twist rate which will not stabilize the heavier/longer projectiles. Try loading some 70-80gr loads just to see if the holes "round out".
try the cleaning rod trick to get a guestimate of the twist rate, that may answer the question straight away.
I am very new to reloading & don't know what the cleaning rod trick is. Can you "pass" that on?
lets say your marks on the rod were 10" apart. Thus, to make the rod revolve 1X fully, the rod travelled down 10" of bore. Therefore your twist rate is 1:10 (one full bullet revolution per 10" of barrel)
crude method but will work in a pinch.
and yes length of the bullet is what determines the needed twist rate. However, in a given bore dia, in order to make a bullet heavier,..it HAS TO be longer. The length/weight are directly related to one another. longer/heavier means faster twist needed to stabilize properly and visa versa.
We have shot the gun 3 diferant times at the range & each time it is shooting 5/8" grups. ? Maybe I should just shoot the factory loads?!
Thanks,
What JustC is saying about the twist is correct. So is perry shooter in the point about O/A bullet length. Since you said your dad had this built in the '50's I'll pass a few factoids. Most of the bigger .25 cal bullets back then were roundnose or semi-round nose therefore shorter and therefore more easily stabilized by a slower twist. Also, in the 50's the thinking was 1-12" twist in everything except the little varmint rounds. I have come across so many old .257's of the day with a 1-12" twist I thought there must have been mercury in their water. Turns out the real radical thinking of the time was the .243 by Winchester and making it a 1-10". Keep in mind too that the 25-06 at the time was not a proprietary cartridge until 1969 So, it was at least a decade before Remington standardised the cartridge. I have found most of the standard or customized rifles in .25 cal of that day were 1-14" or 1-12" twist. I don't know when the 117's became the most prevalent bullet choice, but that is when 1-10" twists became more popular.
EDIT:
Sorry, long story short. 1-14" won't stabilize a .257 cal 100 gr. bullet at approximately .995" It will stabilize an 87 gr. at .887. A 1-12 will handily stabilize the 100 gr. But it really takes a 1-10" to stabilize the 120/130 gr. bullets.
Thanks,
round nose, flat base were infact made so short to be able to stabilize in the "all around" factory twists they were offering. I have no experience with these types as my interest is mainly focused on accuracy and round nose bullets are no good for this kind of work. The flat base I use vary rarely as well due to the better performance in the wind after 300yds of the boat tail pills. I should have explained that earlier as Perry Shooter brought up info that I didn't even consider since I don't use those types of projectiles.[B)]