In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Filler for fast powders in large cases
gotstolefrom
Member Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
Related to the 38/357 with Bullseye Powder post.
I had experienced the problems with the small volume / fast burning powders like Bullseye in 357 and 44spl cases. At the time (30 years ago) a fellow loader suggested that I use some filler after charging with the powder to keep it against the primer. The material (Kaypok I believe) looked like a fluffy synthetic cotton. It did help the groupings, and made loading with that powder possible, but I soon rejected it and went another route.
Last month I had picked up my brass and was 'resting' at the range and another member came by and we chatted for a while. We got on the topic of the fast powders in larger cases. He said he had used a powdered material called Cab-0-Sil with his fast powders that 'bulked them up'. He explained that this stuff must be 'intimately mixed' (his words) with your powder on about a 20% by volume basis. Since the filler is 'virtually weightless' (again his words), loading by weight was still OK and the mix produced a greater volume of propellant in the case.
I have found no reference to this stuff in reloading. Internet searches turned it up everywhere as a filler for epoxy bonding components. It is also listed as an inert filler used in ketchup and other food/sauce products.
Have I missed it somewhere or what ?
I had experienced the problems with the small volume / fast burning powders like Bullseye in 357 and 44spl cases. At the time (30 years ago) a fellow loader suggested that I use some filler after charging with the powder to keep it against the primer. The material (Kaypok I believe) looked like a fluffy synthetic cotton. It did help the groupings, and made loading with that powder possible, but I soon rejected it and went another route.
Last month I had picked up my brass and was 'resting' at the range and another member came by and we chatted for a while. We got on the topic of the fast powders in larger cases. He said he had used a powdered material called Cab-0-Sil with his fast powders that 'bulked them up'. He explained that this stuff must be 'intimately mixed' (his words) with your powder on about a 20% by volume basis. Since the filler is 'virtually weightless' (again his words), loading by weight was still OK and the mix produced a greater volume of propellant in the case.
I have found no reference to this stuff in reloading. Internet searches turned it up everywhere as a filler for epoxy bonding components. It is also listed as an inert filler used in ketchup and other food/sauce products.
Have I missed it somewhere or what ?
Comments
[:(]
From one internet source of it sold as a food additive says a gallon volume weighs about 4 ounces (1/4 pound).
5 pounds (80 ounces) of Bullseye appears to be about a gallon volume by my eyeball. If my eyeball is remotely correct (calibrated to a 'C' cup), this stuff weighs 1/20 the weight of Bullseye. So I'll buy his statement of 'virtually weightless'.
BUT READ ON -- IT MADE MY DECISION
I just spoke with an Uncle who likes to shoot BP. He's retired Army, long ago, is a quiet man, and if pestered he just says " I worked Ordnance ".
He said roughly this to me about 15 minutes ago. " ... if you need boost you fluff it up, add some air, ...don't put that sht in your powder."
Thats good enough for me.
And the discussion is of a powder that is "too fast" for some applications anyway. The 'original discussion' was of a wad of fiber to take up space, not combine with the powder.
Tim
One school of thought says that "a tuft of kapok (Dacron, cotton, hummingbird down) to hold the powder against the primer" gets a running jump at the base of the bullet. Then the tuft is the projectile and the bullet is the obstruction, which can cause enough of a pressure surge to ring-bulge the chamber. Not every time, but sometimes, and barrels aren't cheap. I have seen a picture of a chamber with multiple rings from trying the trick with different powder and bullet loads... until they roughened the chamber enough to prevent extraction.
Ross Seyfried said The Answer was to use a LOT of fibre filler, seven or eight grains, completely filling the airspace between powder and bullet. He trusts the method enough to use it in expensive express rifles.
Then there is the granular filler approach. A friend loads smokeless for his .450 BPE with Grex shot buffer as filler. Safely and successfully, thus far. It is light and takes up all the airspace. Cereal fillers like grits, Cream of Wheat, and corn meal also worked for him but are denser and have to be considered as adding to bullet weight. Lots of CAS shooters use them for reduced loads in cap & ball revolvers; just enough powder to make smoke and ding a plate without much recoil.
The British ammo makers, Eley and Kynoch, used cork wads over the powder of Nitro-for-black ammunition. No damage reported, supposedly because the cork crumbles when hit by powder ignition and does not hit the base of the bullet in a lump.
Me?
I don't use any of the above. I load my one black powder gun with black powder. Light loads in smokeless powder rifles get the muzzle raised before each shot. Pistol ammo doesn't seem to care, but I am not a 2600 bullseye shooter.
Occasionally for light loads in rifles I use a filler. I only use Pufflon lubricating ballistic filler as it is the only one proven to flow without raising pressure, i.e. won't cause a chamber ring. For straight walled rounds though Kapok is fine, as is cotton, toilet paper, cream of wheat, etc. The Pufflon, even in sharply bottlenecked rounds, is billed as safe though and I am quite happy with it. It also acts as an excellant gas seal.