In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
What load/bullet do competitors shoot?
sweaver
Member Posts: 973 ✭✭✭✭
I've watched some videos of competitive shooters and a few of them are using .40 cals like mine instead of 9mm. When I see them there is little recoil, as they are rapidly shooting. Anyone know what bullet weight/powder load to use for the least recoil/fastest recovery for follow up shots? Right now I have 165gr and 200gr bullets. I saw 130grs for sale but are there any lighter out there?
Thanks,
Shane
Thanks,
Shane
Comments
My border collie is smarter than your honor student.
Retired Air Force Msgt--NRA Life Member since 1971
i use a hybred comped barrel in .38 super comp.
10# spring with a shock buff 172 power factor and damn is that gun LOUD
Lt.RRG
"Go over,go under,go around,or go through.But never give up."
You are shooting a model 23 Glock, I believe, unless you changed it.
Most shooters (competition) will use a model 22 or (34/35) with a longer barrel to get lower muzzle flip. Quick, accurate second shot placement is most important.
A few years back when the "required" power factor was higher than the present 165, it was necessary to use heavier bullets. Heavier bullets are known to pass on to the shooter more muzzle flip/jump. At the present the favorite (overall as there are many exceptions) loads are using the lighter 180 and 165 grain bullets with faster burning powders like Vihtavuori N320 and Hodgdon Titegroup among others. It is being said that these combinations give the gun a faster, more controllable cycle rate with better control. I used the heavier 200grain bullets in .40S&W with Vihtavuori N340 and it was a great combination. I still use that powder with the 180gr. bullets, but lately I am leaning towards the faster N320 powder as I find it "snapier" and require less of it, transferring to eventual savings, and even better muzzle control.
thanks for all the input!
shane