In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

DIGITAL SCALES

CORRENCORREN Member Posts: 466 ✭✭✭
Are they worth the investment?I dont load alot,couple hundred rounds a year is all. i use a RCBS 5-0-5 now i have a powder thower but dont use it. just cant get the hang of it so i wiegh every round.

Comments

  • JustCJustC Member Posts: 16,056 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If that is all you load,..you don't need a digital scale. But if you still wish to buy one,..then I would suggest you check out PACT.

    why chase the game when the bullet can get em from here?....
    Got Balistics?
  • ContacFrontContacFront Member Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    2nd on PACT.

    But like JustC said, if you don't do a lot of volume there is no real need for a digital.
  • James AyersJames Ayers Member Posts: 1,598 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    [8D]Pact scale is really wonderful-You just need to use it in a fairly stable temperature and beware of stray breezes. It's SO much easier than using a mechanical scale and you can keep your loads more consistent![:p][:p][:)][:D] jimbo

    On your mark-get set- go away!!
  • plains scoutplains scout Member Posts: 4,563
    edited November -1
    It has made my life easier. You don't need it but it is nice.

    I would get a better priming tool before I would get a fancy digital scale however.



    "Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for." -- Will Rogers

    My friend is one... who takes me for what I am.
    Henry David Thoreau
  • nononsensenononsense Member Posts: 10,928 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Corren,

    I'd have to say that with the volume that you reload, an electronic scale isn't necessary but that doesn't preclude the desire to have one, I know. They can be handy sometimes.

    If you do get one, pay heed to what James says above. Most folks don't realize how touchy these things can be. In addition to what James states, add the fact that fluorescent light will drive the scale crazy. Use plain old incandescent lighting when weighing. Also, turn the scale on for at least 15 minutes before starting to weigh.

    Best.
  • JustCJustC Member Posts: 16,056 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    also,..recalibrate it before each use and if you are weighing a LOT of charges, recalibrate it every so often during the process. This may just be superstition, but I think recalibrating often makes for a more accurate lot of ammunition.

    why chase the game when the bullet can get em from here?....
    Got Balistics?
  • SnellstromSnellstrom Member Posts: 1,085 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I know lots of folks recommend PACT but I am Real Happy with the Lyman digital I bought. I bought it at Graf and sons for a lot less than Midway or Cabela's ( about $100 less). I have weighed every charge for the last 29 years of reloading and when I bought this digital I couldn't believe how much faster and how accurate it is, go digital you won't regret it.
  • jimbowbyjimbowby Member Posts: 3,496
    edited November -1
    [8D]Another advantage to a Good (DIGITAL)scale is-It may be off .005/.010 % on Real weight charge, But it will make all your series of loads within -one session- CONSISTANT, WHICH IS WHAT YOU WANT FOR -MEASURABLE ACCURACY![}:)][:p][:p][:D]

    I'm only wearing Black untill they make something darker
  • PinheadPinhead Member Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    At 200 hrounds a year you really don't need an electronic scale but then its not a matter of need that most of us buy additional equipment anyway. The electronics don't seem to be any more accurate than the mechanical or balance beam scales but they are more convenient. If you want one and have the cash to spare, go for it. I have an RCBS elctronic scale myself and it works just fine but I wouldn't turn down a PACT myself(I may be wrong but I think the RCBS might have been made by PACT as they seem to be identical).
Sign In or Register to comment.