In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Burris Fullfield or Nikon Buckmaster?

ChetStaffordChetStafford Member Posts: 2,794
edited February 2008 in Perry Shooter Competition Shooting and Reloading Forum
Will be picking up my new Abolt on Friday and need a new scope for it

It will be a coyote and general varmint rifle

It is chambered in .223 wssm

I am looking at the fullfeild 4x12x44 or the buckmaster 4x12x50

Any suggestions?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • B17-P51B17-P51 Member Posts: 2,248 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Burris, Since those are the only choices you mentioned.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CubsloverCubslover Member Posts: 18,601 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    You picked the best two scopes for the money. It's personal preference.

    Burris uses a lens coating which filters out the Ultraviolet lights and the Infrared's are much brighter. So you'll see that red's, oranges, and yellow's are brighter.

    Nikon is the opposite, they filter the infrareds and concentrate more on the Ultraviolets. Blues, greys, and greens are brighter in the Nikons.

    Nikon, I see as the brighter scope under hunting conditions and I recommend it over the Burris.

    You really can't go wrong with either.
    Half of the lives they tell about me aren't true.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • goldeneagle76goldeneagle76 Member Posts: 4,359
    edited November -1
    Have a Fullfield II and love it, would be my vote.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JustCJustC Member Posts: 16,056 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Burris,..it's it and that's that,...from the choices you have. Burris is top notch and I can personally attest to their FAST and NO BS warranty.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ChetStaffordChetStafford Member Posts: 2,794
    edited November -1
    Well I am no big fan of Leupold as far as I can tell they are not really any better than Nikon or Burris

    I have 2 Nikon Monarch's.

    I did also consider the Bushnell 3200 elite and don't know anyone who has one and can't find any localy so that I can look at them

    It seems like it is easier to find a house than a scope ypu are satified with[;)]
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sig220_Ruger77Sig220_Ruger77 Member Posts: 12,754 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Burris Fullfield.

    Jon
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • wynn24wynn24 Member Posts: 103 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Burris Fullfied
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bradking1bradking1 Member Posts: 2 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Burris
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • konamtbikerkonamtbiker Member Posts: 284 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have the two scopes on 2 of my rifles. Burris will be the way to go. Buckmasters is a good scope. The Monarch is much better though than the Buckmasters. Good Hunting
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mk 19Mk 19 Member Posts: 8,170
    edited November -1
    For the two theat you picked I would go with the Burris, but if you could find a Nikon Monarch then go with the Nikon, it is a great scope and I favor it over Leupolds that are twice the price.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ChetStaffordChetStafford Member Posts: 2,794
    edited November -1
    I got to looking on Midsouth and found a Nikon Monarch 4x16x42 side focus with a BDC recticle for $359

    My search is over this is the scope I am going to buy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bgjohnbgjohn Member Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by konamtbiker
    I have the two scopes on 2 of my rifles. Burris will be the way to go. Buckmasters is a good scope. The Monarch is much better though than the Buckmasters. Good Hunting


    Monarchs cost twice as much. I love the two buckmasters that I have.
    JM
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ChetStaffordChetStafford Member Posts: 2,794
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by bgjohn
    Monarchs cost twice as much. I love the two buckmasters that I have.
    JM


    The buckmaster that I was looking at was $359 The Monarch I am going to buy is $359 so I will get the Monarch they are good glass for a very fair price[;)]
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • konamtbikerkonamtbiker Member Posts: 284 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    You will not be upset! Monarch is a great optic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bgjohnbgjohn Member Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    That is a good price for the Monarch.
    JM[:)]
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ahanksterahankster Member Posts: 253 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Nikon all the way.
    I have three and a fourth on the way. Two are 4.5x14 monarchs and one 3x9 prostaff. For the same money, there just isn't any comparison, in my humble opinion.
    I just picked up a Rock River Varmint w/ a 24inch ss barrel. You can bet the next scope on it will be something similar, but in a mil-dot.
    Hank
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.