In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
powder question
47studebaker
Member Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭✭✭
I started reloading late this spring and noticed something strange:
I am using hogdon titegroup and CCI primers to reload .45 ACP,
my rounds are now extremely dirty. I haven't had to clean that much carbon out of my gun and off my hands since I used Wolf ammo.
Is titegroup just a dirty powder or am I doing something wrong?
I am using hogdon titegroup and CCI primers to reload .45 ACP,
my rounds are now extremely dirty. I haven't had to clean that much carbon out of my gun and off my hands since I used Wolf ammo.
Is titegroup just a dirty powder or am I doing something wrong?
Comments
Thanks David.
Todd
JW
Thanks in advance.
With the rounds on that list, you'll need at least three powders, and four would be better.
You'll need one powder for the Hornet alone. I'd suggest Hodgdon LilGun far and away the best, followed by Accurate 1680.
For the 222 and 223, there are numerous choices. If I had to name one to load both, it would probably be Hodgdon Benchmark, with H322, Accurate 2015 or Reloder 10X as viable alternates.
The 308 will thrive on RL-15, and that will also feed many loads in the Roberts.
If I had to economize, I'd pick W748 for the 222, 223 and 308 in most bullet weights - but it wouldn't quite do as well across the board for all three cartridges.
Hodgon has plenty of data online for all these except the Reloder powders, which are by Alliant. Alliant does have data online.
W.D.
As said, it's fine for the 7mm mag, and possibly the 257.
I have no experience with the 22 hornet but for the 223 don't overlook the old standby of 4895; also fine for the 257, 308, and it too will work in the 7mm mag, but won't wring all the performance out of it.
I've had great luck with IMR 4831 and 100 to 120 grain bullets in my .257. 4198 is another good one in the .222 class.
He could get by with three, but four would be much better and allow him more versatility. Exactly which two besides his current IMR4831 and my proposed LilGun would be up to personal choice and availability - the latter being no small consideration these days.
* In manuals or writings published before 1973, any mention of 4831 will refer to Hodgdon's H4831. In older manuals, it was customary to list powder simply as "4831" with no designation connecting it to the Hodgdon line. The reason for this is simple; prior to DuPont's introduction of IMR 4831 in 1972, the surplus 4831 sold by Hodgdon was the only powder to carry this designation. Despite their similar nomenclature, these two powders (IMR 4831 and Hodgdon H4831) are not interchangeable and must not be confused. IMR 4831 is significantly faster burning than H4831, and may produce dangerous pressures if used with data developed for the latter.
IMR-4831 will work fine in the 7mm Rem. Mag. and will work with the .257 Roberts as long as you stick with the bullets heavier than 90 grains.
There are 'cross-references' for powder but they are referred to as Burn Rate charts. They are not absolutes but truly just a reference. You still need to test all of your loads for safety, pressure and accuracy:
http://www.reloadersnest.com/burnrates.asp
All of the powder manufacturers have descriptions and load data online these days. It may be abbreviated but it's data that's readily available. I still recommend buying as many reloading manuals as you can afford. This is a case of more is better.
Best.
Thanks again.