In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Shotshell reloading - FOLLOW UP QUESTION
calrugerfan
Member Posts: 18,209 ✭
Just curious if standard air rifle bb's can be used as shot when reloading?
If they can, is it advised?
FOLLOW UP QUESTION: Here in California, hunting with lead shot is illegal (as far as I know, I've never hunted) so they have to use steel shot. Wouldn't that be the same as using bb's?
If they can, is it advised?
FOLLOW UP QUESTION: Here in California, hunting with lead shot is illegal (as far as I know, I've never hunted) so they have to use steel shot. Wouldn't that be the same as using bb's?
Comments
During my youth I reloaded copper BB's into shotguns many times, true it was for an open skeet choke, but there were no real issues or damage.
I'm quite sure I have done many things I should not have while reloading, but I'm interested in the explanation as to "why" this would be so bad.
Looking to learn.
See the answer that zimmden provided.
Steel shot is in the RC 10-12 range, air rifle BB's are in the RC 35-40 range (ball bearings are in the RC 60-65 range). Big difference, esp considering your barrel is in the RC 40-45 range.
But consider that a rifle bullet is normally coated with 15% cupronickel and is fired down a steel barrel with no damage, and the above load has the additional plastic wad that sits between the barrel and the shot until exit. So my logic from a "damage" of the barrel point of view should be correct and the hardness of the base coated metal should have little effect on barrel damage. RC of the base material is not a question, it's the material that "may" touch the barrel that's important.
I may be way off base here, but I've done it many times in the past with no damage and the logic of the RC hardness doesn't compute.
As stated by many, not recommended, but the question is of "if" it
would damage.
Further update: Look up Nickel plated shot that was used by many in the '60's in Italy. This is harder then BB's and copper plated shot of that era. This was used as the premier WW load when they had their plant in Italy.
Tailgunner: Maybe there is something I am missing, BUT, a BB is coated with Copper, and last time I looked, copper is softer then steel. I admit the compression could be an issue.
But consider that a rifle bullet is normally coated with 15% cupronickel and is fired down a steel barrel with no damage, and the above load has the additional plastic wad that sits between the barrel and the shot until exit. So my logic from a "damage" of the barrel point of view should be correct and the hardness of the base coated metal should have little effect on barrel damage. RC of the base material is not a question, it's the material that "may" touch the barrel that's important.
I may be way off base here, but I've done it many times in the past with no damage and the logic of the RC hardness doesn't compute.
As stated by many, not recommended, but the question is of "if" it
would damage.
Further update: Look up Nickel plated shot that was used by many in the '60's in Italy. This is harder then BB's and copper plated shot of that era. This was used as the premier WW load when they had their plant in Italy.
BB's are copper WASHED steel, IE to a thickness of maybe .0005 as a corrossion inhibitor. Copper plating is normaly about .005 thick and bullet jackets are .032 to .050 thick (over a lead core).
So yes, hardness of the base material does come into play, along with the thickness of the coating.
Bottom line is "don't use it". So our discussion doesn't matter. But thanks for the information, it's always good to learn something.
"Lead shot is still the best performer for the money, but environmental restrictions on the use of lead, especially with waterfowl, require steel, bismuth, or tungsten composites. Steel, being significantly less dense than lead, requires larger shot sizes, but is a good choice when cost is a consideration. Steel, however, cannot safely be used in some older shotguns without causing damage to either the bore or to the choke of the shotgun due to the hardness of steel shot. Since tungsten is a very hard metal, it must also be used with care in older guns. Tungsten shot is often alloyed with nickel and iron, softening the base metal".
Tungsten finish is about 63-67 on the Rockwell C scale. Most Nickel and Tungsten is harder then the steel BB's listed above, and they are loaded for shotguns. The FPS is not a consideration due to the fact that many BB/Pellet guns shoot 1100-1200 FPS and the wad acts as a cushion as it crushes. In addition, the harder the shot, the better the pattern since there is little deformation of the actual pellets.
Again, this is not to say "do it", just can't find a good reason not to as long as it's a modern gun that could use steel shot and you use a plastic wad. As stated by the shot Mfg'r, even steel is not recommended due to possible wear of the barrel ID, but I don't see where BB's would be any worse.
Maybe someone who has done this and had barrel damage can respond, but I have done this many times and never had any barrel damage (using fixed skeet chokes).