In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

44 Mag reloads

264fan264fan Member Posts: 81 ✭✭
Just getting back into using cast bullets. Used to load with Unique but looking for something that will take up more space in the case and burn slower. 1200 fps is where I would like to be. Any suggestions?

Comments

  • MIKE WISKEYMIKE WISKEY Member Posts: 10,036 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    h110, imr 4227, blue dot
  • dcs shootersdcs shooters Member Posts: 10,870 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I used a lot of IMR 2400.

    I used Winchester large pistol with 2400. Only used mag. with H-110.
  • 264fan264fan Member Posts: 81 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    dcs, do you use Mag or std primers with 2400?
  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 14,083 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dcs shooters
    I used a lot of IMR 2400.

    +1
  • grizzclawgrizzclaw Member Posts: 1,159 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I use 4227 with a large pistol primer.
  • SCorversSCorvers Member Posts: 2,063 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    2400 for plinkin/huntin loads and H-110 for full power loads. The H-110 doesn't perform as well in low power loads. I use LP primers (that's what I have ALOT of[:D]), but have used the magnum primers in the past with good success.
  • 44shotdoctor44shotdoctor Member Posts: 178 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well the main problem I see is using h110 with cast bullets unless you are using a gas check. With h110 with lead will move around 1400fps. Not such a good idea.
  • MobuckMobuck Member Posts: 14,088 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I was looking for a way to use s lot of shotgun powder I had and happened to try 800x in the 44 mag. Works well in moderate loadings but that doesn't address the low load density issue. Trail Boss is the answer to that but may not give you the velocity you want.
  • leadburnerleadburner Member Posts: 81 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    HS-6 is a good powder for that speed range too.12 grns. behind a 210 grn cast boolit gives about 1150-1200 fps with a standard lp primer.
  • Colonel PlinkColonel Plink Member Posts: 16,460
    edited November -1
    I've always been told that, to reduce leading, keep velocities below 1,000 fps. Are there any leading issues at 1,200?
  • partisanpartisan Member Posts: 6,414
    edited November -1
    Don't forget the gaschecks! I learned the hard way on my Mod.29.
  • 264fan264fan Member Posts: 81 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    don't need gas checks at 1200, when I do use them I use crimp ons.
  • 264fan264fan Member Posts: 81 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
    I've always been told that, to reduce leading, keep velocities below 1,000 fps. Are there any leading issues at 1,200?

    If the bullets are the correct hardness, sized properly, and a good lube 1200 is no problem. I always break a new bore in with at least 300 jacketed before using cast.
  • Colonel PlinkColonel Plink Member Posts: 16,460
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by 264fan
    quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
    I've always been told that, to reduce leading, keep velocities below 1,000 fps. Are there any leading issues at 1,200?

    If the bullets are the correct hardness, sized properly, and a good lube 1200 is no problem. I always break a new bore in with at least 300 jacketed before using cast.


    Thank you.
  • RCrosbyRCrosby Member Posts: 3,808 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    +1 264fan,
    As for the primer question; powders like the H110, yes , I'd use magnum primers. With 2400 I get great results with either. Velocity with 240 grain hard cast is basically identical with 21 grains and CCI 350's as it is with 22 grains and CCI 300's. Always bugs me that so many writers will quote favorite handgun load without specifying the primer used. If my memory serves me well I once read that Elmers well known load of 22 grains of 2400 with a 240 hard cast was with regular primers but that's rarely mentioned in articles citing that load.
  • 264fan264fan Member Posts: 81 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by RCrosby
    +1 264fan,
    As for the primer question; powders like the H110, yes , I'd use magnum primers. With 2400 I get great results with either. Velocity with 240 grain hard cast is basically identical with 21 grains and CCI 350's as it is with 22 grains and CCI 300's. Always bugs me that so many writers will quote favorite handgun load without specifying the primer used. If my memory serves me well I once read that Elmers well known load of 22 grains of 2400 with a 240 hard cast was with regular primers but that's rarely mentioned in articles citing that load.

    I could never get 22 grains without a super compressed load!
  • RCrosbyRCrosby Member Posts: 3,808 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I could never get 22 grains without a super compressed load!

    Interesting. My powder is more than a few years old. I wonder if the new lots are bulkier? What kind of brass do you use? I load a mixture of Rem., W-W and Federal and never felt near to capacity with my own favorite, which was the 21 grains.
    Getting older I guess. I've decided that I don't need that much oomph anymore and load to about 1,000 fps for my deer and general purpose loads. Self imposed maximum range of 50 yards with iron sights. The extra velocity was nice back in the day when I was knocking down steel rams at 200 meters.
  • rsnyder55rsnyder55 Member Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If you already reload shotguns, I found that some of the powders work well with high capacity pistol calibers such as the 44magnum.
  • RCrosbyRCrosby Member Posts: 3,808 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    And then there's "Lil-Gun" to consider. Higher velocity and lower pressure in the Hornet, and since 2400 works well in the little .22 as well as the .44 I wondered if L-G might work in the Magnum?
    Thought I saw some published loads but can't lay my hands on them at the moment. Anyone?
  • 264fan264fan Member Posts: 81 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by RCrosby



    I could never get 22 grains without a super compressed load!

    Interesting. My powder is more than a few years old. I wonder if the new lots are bulkier? What kind of brass do you use? I load a mixture of Rem., W-W and Federal and never felt near to capacity with my own favorite, which was the 21 grains.
    Getting older I guess. I've decided that I don't need that much oomph anymore and load to about 1,000 fps for my deer and general purpose loads. Self imposed maximum range of 50 yards with iron sights. The extra velocity was nice back in the day when I was knocking down steel rams at 200 meters.

    I shoot either a 245 or 255 SWC and there is a lot of bullet in the case.
  • RCrosbyRCrosby Member Posts: 3,808 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    264fan,
    You got my curiousity up, so I tried a little experiment.
    Grabbed 3 random .44 cases; a W-W, an R-P and a PMC.
    By weight they scaled out at 112.2, 114.2 and 114.7 respectively.
    I took the heaviest of the 3, the PMC and weighed out 22.1 grains of Alliant 2400. With a standard short funnel I filled the case. A jacket 240 grain bullet (Hornady XTP) or a hard cast 240 SWC (Carrolls) would seat in the case all the way to cannelure or crimping groove with NO compression. Not much if any air space, but no compression.
    Granted these were fired, not yet resized cases, which would reduce the internal capacity a bit, but IMHO not enough to result in anything more than slight compression.
    Just noted a couple of references to IMR 2400. Could this be the source of our discrepancies? I'm using Alliant or Hercules 2400. Not familiar with IMR 2400.
Sign In or Register to comment.